Potential use of phosphorus saturation degree as combined indicator for crop yield and leaching risks at regional scale

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yu Gu , Gerard H. Ros , Qichao Zhu , Maarten van Doorn , Jianbo Shen , Zejiang Cai , Minggang Xu , Wim de Vries
{"title":"Potential use of phosphorus saturation degree as combined indicator for crop yield and leaching risks at regional scale","authors":"Yu Gu ,&nbsp;Gerard H. Ros ,&nbsp;Qichao Zhu ,&nbsp;Maarten van Doorn ,&nbsp;Jianbo Shen ,&nbsp;Zejiang Cai ,&nbsp;Minggang Xu ,&nbsp;Wim de Vries","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To ensure the sustainable use of phosphorus (P) fertilizers it is necessary to develop P management strategies that maximize crop yield while minimizing P leaching. Current P management practices, based on single agronomic soil P tests such as Olsen P (P<sub>OLSEN</sub>), do not consider the P sorption capacity allowing one to predict soil P dynamics in response to long-term P inputs and related impacts on crop yield, P uptake and P loss. The oxalate extraction method, measuring contents of P, aluminium (Al) and iron (Fe), has been identified as a high-potential agri-environmental P test as it measures the reversibly sorbed P pool. This test gives insights in the plant-available P pool, the P sorption capacity and the degree of P Saturation (PSD). In this study, we evaluated the performance of P<sub>OLSEN</sub> and PSD in explaining crop yield and P leaching risks, using long-term field experiments from China (n = 1) and Europe (n = 11), and we applied these insights to an inventory dataset (grid-sampling based) of Qiyang county in China. The variations in crop yield and P leaching risk were better explained by PSD (R<sup>2</sup>=0.5–0.95 for crop yield and 0.84–0.95 for P leaching risk) than by P<sub>OLSEN</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.68–0.93 for crop yield and &lt; 0.73 for P leaching risk). The PSD target level to achieve 90 % of the potential yield was higher than the critical level to avoid enhanced P leaching for the Chinese but not for the European experiments. When applied on regional scale, we showed that the use of P<sub>OLSEN</sub> might underestimate P demand for crop production and overestimate the potential leaching risk. Considering the theoretical advantages of PSD as a combined agri-environmental soil P test, we discussed the implications of its use for regional P management and showed that the α value, which is used to estimate PSD from oxalate extractable Al and Fe, needs to be adjusted for regional pedogenic and related climate factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 127347"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124002685","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To ensure the sustainable use of phosphorus (P) fertilizers it is necessary to develop P management strategies that maximize crop yield while minimizing P leaching. Current P management practices, based on single agronomic soil P tests such as Olsen P (POLSEN), do not consider the P sorption capacity allowing one to predict soil P dynamics in response to long-term P inputs and related impacts on crop yield, P uptake and P loss. The oxalate extraction method, measuring contents of P, aluminium (Al) and iron (Fe), has been identified as a high-potential agri-environmental P test as it measures the reversibly sorbed P pool. This test gives insights in the plant-available P pool, the P sorption capacity and the degree of P Saturation (PSD). In this study, we evaluated the performance of POLSEN and PSD in explaining crop yield and P leaching risks, using long-term field experiments from China (n = 1) and Europe (n = 11), and we applied these insights to an inventory dataset (grid-sampling based) of Qiyang county in China. The variations in crop yield and P leaching risk were better explained by PSD (R2=0.5–0.95 for crop yield and 0.84–0.95 for P leaching risk) than by POLSEN (R2=0.68–0.93 for crop yield and < 0.73 for P leaching risk). The PSD target level to achieve 90 % of the potential yield was higher than the critical level to avoid enhanced P leaching for the Chinese but not for the European experiments. When applied on regional scale, we showed that the use of POLSEN might underestimate P demand for crop production and overestimate the potential leaching risk. Considering the theoretical advantages of PSD as a combined agri-environmental soil P test, we discussed the implications of its use for regional P management and showed that the α value, which is used to estimate PSD from oxalate extractable Al and Fe, needs to be adjusted for regional pedogenic and related climate factors.

将磷饱和度作为区域范围内作物产量和沥滤风险综合指标的潜力
为确保磷(P)肥料的可持续使用,有必要制定磷管理策略,在最大限度地提高作物产量的同时,最大限度地减少磷沥滤。目前的磷管理方法以单一的农艺土壤磷测试(如奥尔森磷测试(POLSEN))为基础,没有考虑磷的吸附能力,因此无法预测长期磷投入对土壤磷的动态影响,以及对作物产量、磷吸收和磷流失的相关影响。草酸盐萃取法测量钾、铝(Al)和铁(Fe)的含量,被认为是一种极具潜力的农业环境钾测试方法,因为它测量的是可逆吸附的钾库。该测试可深入了解植物可利用的磷库、磷吸附能力和磷饱和度(PSD)。在本研究中,我们利用中国(n = 1)和欧洲(n = 11)的长期田间试验,评估了 POLSEN 和 PSD 在解释作物产量和钾浸出风险方面的性能,并将这些见解应用于中国祁阳县的库存数据集(基于网格采样)。与 POLSEN(R2=0.68-0.93(作物产量)和 0.73(P 浸出风险))相比,PSD(R2=0.5-0.95(作物产量)和 0.84-0.95(P 浸出风险))能更好地解释作物产量和 P 浸出风险的变化。在中国的实验中,实现 90% 潜在产量的 PSD 目标水平高于避免增加 P 浸出的临界水平,而在欧洲的实验中则不然。在区域范围内应用时,我们发现使用 POLSEN 可能会低估作物生产对磷的需求,并高估潜在的沥滤风险。考虑到 PSD 作为农业-环境土壤钾综合测试的理论优势,我们讨论了使用 PSD 进行区域钾管理的意义,并表明需要根据区域成土因素和相关气候因素对用于估算 PSD 的草酸盐可提取铝和铁的α 值进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信