Trunk-to-leg volume and appendicular lean mass from a commercial 3-dimensional optical body scanner for disease risk identification

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jonathan P. Bennett , Michael C. Wong , Yong En Liu , Brandon K. Quon , Nisa N. Kelly , Andrea K. Garber , Steven B. Heymsfield , John A. Shepherd
{"title":"Trunk-to-leg volume and appendicular lean mass from a commercial 3-dimensional optical body scanner for disease risk identification","authors":"Jonathan P. Bennett ,&nbsp;Michael C. Wong ,&nbsp;Yong En Liu ,&nbsp;Brandon K. Quon ,&nbsp;Nisa N. Kelly ,&nbsp;Andrea K. Garber ,&nbsp;Steven B. Heymsfield ,&nbsp;John A. Shepherd","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><p>Body shape expressed as the trunk-to-leg volume ratio is associated with diabetes and mortality due to the associations between higher adiposity and lower lean mass with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) risk. Reduced appendicular muscle mass is associated with malnutrition risk and age-related frailty, and is a risk factor for poor treatment outcomes related to MetS and other clinical conditions (e.g.; cancer). These measures are traditionally assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which can be difficult to access in clinical settings. The Shape Up! Adults trial (SUA) demonstrated the accuracy and precision of 3-dimensional optical imaging (3DO) for body composition as compared to DXA and other criterion measures. Here we assessed whether trunk-to-leg volume estimates derived from 3DO are associated with MetS risk in a similar way as when measured by DXA. We further explored if estimations of appendicular lean mass (ALM) could be made using 3DO to further improve the accessibility of measuring this important frailty and disease risk factor.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>SUA recruited participants across sex, age (18–40, 40–60, &gt;60 years), BMI (under, normal, overweight, obese), and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic [NH] Black, NH White, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) categories. Each participant had whole-body DXA and 3DO scans, and measures of cardiovascular health. The 3DO measures of trunk and leg volumes were calibrated to DXA to express equivalent trunk-to-leg volume ratios. We expressed each blood measure and overall MetS risk in quartile gradations of trunk-to-leg volume previously defined by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Finally, we utilized 3DO measures to estimate DXA ALM using ten-fold cross-validation of the entire dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were 502 (273 female) adults, mean age = 46.0 ± 16.5y, BMI = 27.6 ± 7.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and a mean DXA trunk-to-leg volume ratio of 1.47 ± 0.22 (females: 1.43 ± 0.23; males: 1.52 ± 0.20). After adjustments for age and sex, each standard deviation increase in trunk-to-leg volume by 3DO was associated with a 3.3 (95% odds ratio [OR] = 2.4–4.2) times greater risk of MetS, with individuals in the highest quartile of trunk-to-leg at 27.4 (95% CI: 9.0–53.1) times greater risk of MetS compared to the lowest quartile. Risks of elevated blood biomarkers as related to high 3DO trunk-to-leg volume ratios were similar to previously published comparisons using DXA trunk-to-leg volume ratios. Estimated ALM by 3DO was correlated to DXA (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.96, root mean square error = 1.5 kg) using ten-fold cross-validation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using thresholds of trunk-to-leg associated with MetS developed on a sample of US-representative adults, trunk-to-leg ratio by 3DO after adjustments for offsets showed significant associations to blood parameters and MetS risk. 3DO scans provide a precise and accurate estimation of ALM across the range of body sizes included in the study sample. The development of these additional measures improves the clinical utility of 3DO for the assessment of MetS risk as well as the identification of low muscle mass associated with poor cardiometabolic and functional health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"43 10","pages":"Pages 2430-2437"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026156142400339X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

Body shape expressed as the trunk-to-leg volume ratio is associated with diabetes and mortality due to the associations between higher adiposity and lower lean mass with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) risk. Reduced appendicular muscle mass is associated with malnutrition risk and age-related frailty, and is a risk factor for poor treatment outcomes related to MetS and other clinical conditions (e.g.; cancer). These measures are traditionally assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which can be difficult to access in clinical settings. The Shape Up! Adults trial (SUA) demonstrated the accuracy and precision of 3-dimensional optical imaging (3DO) for body composition as compared to DXA and other criterion measures. Here we assessed whether trunk-to-leg volume estimates derived from 3DO are associated with MetS risk in a similar way as when measured by DXA. We further explored if estimations of appendicular lean mass (ALM) could be made using 3DO to further improve the accessibility of measuring this important frailty and disease risk factor.

Methods

SUA recruited participants across sex, age (18–40, 40–60, >60 years), BMI (under, normal, overweight, obese), and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic [NH] Black, NH White, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) categories. Each participant had whole-body DXA and 3DO scans, and measures of cardiovascular health. The 3DO measures of trunk and leg volumes were calibrated to DXA to express equivalent trunk-to-leg volume ratios. We expressed each blood measure and overall MetS risk in quartile gradations of trunk-to-leg volume previously defined by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Finally, we utilized 3DO measures to estimate DXA ALM using ten-fold cross-validation of the entire dataset.

Results

Participants were 502 (273 female) adults, mean age = 46.0 ± 16.5y, BMI = 27.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 and a mean DXA trunk-to-leg volume ratio of 1.47 ± 0.22 (females: 1.43 ± 0.23; males: 1.52 ± 0.20). After adjustments for age and sex, each standard deviation increase in trunk-to-leg volume by 3DO was associated with a 3.3 (95% odds ratio [OR] = 2.4–4.2) times greater risk of MetS, with individuals in the highest quartile of trunk-to-leg at 27.4 (95% CI: 9.0–53.1) times greater risk of MetS compared to the lowest quartile. Risks of elevated blood biomarkers as related to high 3DO trunk-to-leg volume ratios were similar to previously published comparisons using DXA trunk-to-leg volume ratios. Estimated ALM by 3DO was correlated to DXA (r2 = 0.96, root mean square error = 1.5 kg) using ten-fold cross-validation.

Conclusion

Using thresholds of trunk-to-leg associated with MetS developed on a sample of US-representative adults, trunk-to-leg ratio by 3DO after adjustments for offsets showed significant associations to blood parameters and MetS risk. 3DO scans provide a precise and accurate estimation of ALM across the range of body sizes included in the study sample. The development of these additional measures improves the clinical utility of 3DO for the assessment of MetS risk as well as the identification of low muscle mass associated with poor cardiometabolic and functional health.

从商用三维光学人体扫描仪获得的用于疾病风险识别的躯干到腿的体积和附肢瘦肉质量
背景与ampamp;目的以躯干与腿部体积比表示的体形与糖尿病和死亡率有关,这是因为较高的脂肪含量和较低的瘦体重与代谢综合征(MetS)风险有关。阑尾肌肉质量降低与营养不良风险和年龄相关虚弱有关,也是代谢综合征和其他临床疾病(如癌症)治疗效果不佳的风险因素。这些指标传统上通过双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)进行评估,但在临床环境中很难获得。塑身!Adults 试验(SUA)表明,与 DXA 和其他标准测量方法相比,三维光学成像(3DO)对身体成分测量的准确性和精确度更高。在此,我们评估了 3DO 得出的躯干到腿的体积估计值是否与 DXA 测量的 MetS 风险有类似的关联。我们还进一步探讨了是否可以使用 3DO 估算附肢瘦体重 (ALM),以进一步提高测量这一重要的虚弱和疾病风险因素的便利性。方法SUA 招募了不同性别、年龄(18-40 岁、40-60 岁、60 岁)、体重指数(低于、正常、超重、肥胖)和种族/民族(非西班牙裔 [NH] 黑人、西班牙裔白人、亚裔、夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民)类别的参与者。每位参与者都进行了全身 DXA 和 3DO 扫描,并测量了心血管健康状况。3DO测量的躯干和腿部体积与DXA进行了校准,以表示等效的躯干与腿部体积比。我们用美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)之前定义的躯干与腿部体积的四分位等级来表示每种血液指标和总体 MetS 风险。最后,我们利用 3DO 测量方法,通过对整个数据集进行十倍交叉验证来估算 DXA ALM。结果参与者为 502 名(273 名女性)成年人,平均年龄 = 46.0 ± 16.5 岁,体重指数 = 27.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2,平均 DXA 躯干与腿部体积比为 1.47 ± 0.22(女性:1.43 ± 0.23;男性:1.52 ± 0.20)。在对年龄和性别进行调整后,3DO显示的躯干与腿的体积每增加一个标准差,患MetS的风险就会增加3.3倍(95%几率比[OR] = 2.4-4.2),与最低四分位数相比,躯干与腿的体积最高四分位数的人患MetS的风险增加27.4倍(95% CI:9.0-53.1)。血液生物标志物升高的风险与高3DO躯干与腿部体积比有关,与之前发表的使用DXA躯干与腿部体积比进行的比较结果相似。通过十倍交叉验证,3DO 估计的 ALM 与 DXA 相关(r2 = 0.96,均方根误差 = 1.5 千克)。3DO 扫描可对研究样本中各种体型的 ALM 进行精确和准确的估计。这些附加测量指标的开发提高了 3DO 在评估 MetS 风险以及识别与不良心脏代谢和功能健康相关的低肌肉质量方面的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信