Influence of time to ablation on outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation with pre-existing heart failure

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Adi Lador MD , Sonia Maccioni MPH , Rahul Khanna PhD , Dongyu Zhang PhD, MD
{"title":"Influence of time to ablation on outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation with pre-existing heart failure","authors":"Adi Lador MD ,&nbsp;Sonia Maccioni MPH ,&nbsp;Rahul Khanna PhD ,&nbsp;Dongyu Zhang PhD, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are cardiac disorders that often coexist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate how time to ablation could influence the outcomes of AF patients with pre-existing HF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the 2013 to 2022 Optum Clinformatics database, AF patients with pre-existing HF were classified into 2 groups: early ablation (ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis) and late ablation (ablation in the 6- to 24-month period after AF diagnosis). Outcomes including AF-related hospitalization, electrical cardioversion, repeat ablation, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use, and AF recurrence (a composite outcome of the aforementioned events) were assessed in the postblanking 24-month period. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Poisson regression estimated risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 601 patients were identified (early ablation: 347; late ablation: 254). In 24 months, the weighted data suggested that patients in the early ablation cohort had significantly lower rate of composite outcome (49.32% vs 61.39%, <em>P =</em> .01), repeat ablation (8.56% vs 17.35%, <em>P &lt;</em> .01), and AAD use (35.95% vs 47.92%, <em>P =</em> .01). Early ablation was associated with a 20%, 51%, and 25% lower risk of composite outcome (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.94), repeat ablation (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31–0.79), and AAD use (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.92), respectively. No significant difference in AF-related hospitalization and electrical cardioversion were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AF patients with pre-existing HF undergoing ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis have a lower risk of AF recurrence than those undergoing late ablation, which was evidenced by a lower rate of repeat ablation and AAD use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 9","pages":"Pages 606-613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002563/pdfft?md5=1eea12f675a47690735a3f0607acfa3c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002563-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are cardiac disorders that often coexist.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate how time to ablation could influence the outcomes of AF patients with pre-existing HF.

Methods

Using the 2013 to 2022 Optum Clinformatics database, AF patients with pre-existing HF were classified into 2 groups: early ablation (ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis) and late ablation (ablation in the 6- to 24-month period after AF diagnosis). Outcomes including AF-related hospitalization, electrical cardioversion, repeat ablation, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use, and AF recurrence (a composite outcome of the aforementioned events) were assessed in the postblanking 24-month period. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Poisson regression estimated risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome.

Results

Overall, 601 patients were identified (early ablation: 347; late ablation: 254). In 24 months, the weighted data suggested that patients in the early ablation cohort had significantly lower rate of composite outcome (49.32% vs 61.39%, P = .01), repeat ablation (8.56% vs 17.35%, P < .01), and AAD use (35.95% vs 47.92%, P = .01). Early ablation was associated with a 20%, 51%, and 25% lower risk of composite outcome (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.94), repeat ablation (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31–0.79), and AAD use (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.92), respectively. No significant difference in AF-related hospitalization and electrical cardioversion were observed.

Conclusion

AF patients with pre-existing HF undergoing ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis have a lower risk of AF recurrence than those undergoing late ablation, which was evidenced by a lower rate of repeat ablation and AAD use.

Abstract Image

消融时间对原有心力衰竭的心房颤动患者预后的影响
背景心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)是经常并存的心脏疾病。方法利用 2013 年至 2022 年 Optum Clinformatics 数据库,将原有 HF 的心房颤动患者分为两组:早期消融(心房颤动诊断后 6 个月内消融)和晚期消融(心房颤动诊断后 6 至 24 个月内消融)。结果包括房颤相关住院、心脏电复律、重复消融、抗心律失常药物 (AAD) 使用和房颤复发(上述事件的综合结果),在空白对照后 24 个月期间进行评估。治疗加权泊松回归的逆概率估计了每种结果的风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。结果总计确定了 601 例患者(早期消融:347 例;晚期消融:254 例)。在 24 个月内,加权数据显示,早期消融组患者的综合结果率(49.32% vs 61.39%,P = .01)、重复消融率(8.56% vs 17.35%,P <.01)和 AAD 使用率(35.95% vs 47.92%,P = .01)显著较低。早期消融与复合结局风险降低 20%、51% 和 25%(RR 0.80,95% CI 0.69-0.94)、重复消融风险降低 0.49(RR 0.49,95% CI 0.31-0.79)和使用 AAD 风险降低 0.75(RR 0.61-0.92)相关。结论 在确诊房颤后 6 个月内接受消融术的原有心房颤动患者的房颤复发风险低于晚期消融术患者,这体现在重复消融术和使用 AAD 的比例较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信