Lin Li MD , Anna Busija MD, PhD , Han Feng PhD , Amitabh C. Pandey MD , Thierry Le Jemtel MD , Bassam G. Wanna MD
{"title":"Effective and safe mechanical transvenous lead extraction in a low-volume center","authors":"Lin Li MD , Anna Busija MD, PhD , Han Feng PhD , Amitabh C. Pandey MD , Thierry Le Jemtel MD , Bassam G. Wanna MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices was once deemed highly risky by high-volume centers. However, advancements in technology have significantly reduced the risk, making TLE a safer procedure in electrophysiology.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs in a low-volume center with a single operator.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively accessed electronic medical records from the Tulane University School of Medicine system in New Orleans, Louisiana, and included patients who received mechanical TLE from 2016 to 2023. We analyzed the indications for TLE, patient characteristics, lead characteristics, success rate, and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 149 consecutive mechanical TLEs with an average implant duration of 105 months. A total of 53.7% (80) of TLEs were indicated for infectious reasons, and 37.6% (56) were high-voltage leads. Clinical success and complete procedural success rates were both 94.6% with no procedure-related mortality or major complications. The periprocedural mortality rate was 1.25% (1). Minor complications included a left chest pocket hematoma, a left groin hematoma, and urinary retention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs performed in a low-volume center are comparable with those in high-volume centers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 9","pages":"Pages 639-643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002551/pdfft?md5=57482ff4bec85f7213cb9c46be6e46c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002551-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices was once deemed highly risky by high-volume centers. However, advancements in technology have significantly reduced the risk, making TLE a safer procedure in electrophysiology.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs in a low-volume center with a single operator.
Methods
This study retrospectively accessed electronic medical records from the Tulane University School of Medicine system in New Orleans, Louisiana, and included patients who received mechanical TLE from 2016 to 2023. We analyzed the indications for TLE, patient characteristics, lead characteristics, success rate, and complications.
Results
We included 149 consecutive mechanical TLEs with an average implant duration of 105 months. A total of 53.7% (80) of TLEs were indicated for infectious reasons, and 37.6% (56) were high-voltage leads. Clinical success and complete procedural success rates were both 94.6% with no procedure-related mortality or major complications. The periprocedural mortality rate was 1.25% (1). Minor complications included a left chest pocket hematoma, a left groin hematoma, and urinary retention.
Conclusion
The efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs performed in a low-volume center are comparable with those in high-volume centers.
背景心脏植入式电子设备的经静脉导联取出术(TLE)曾一度被高容量中心视为高风险手术。然而,技术的进步大大降低了风险,使 TLE 成为电生理学中更安全的手术。本研究的目的是在一个低容量中心,由一名操作者进行机械 TLE 的有效性和安全性。我们分析了TLE的适应症、患者特征、导联特征、成功率和并发症。结果我们纳入了149例连续的机械TLE,平均植入时间为105个月。53.7%(80 例)的 TLE 是由于感染原因,37.6%(56 例)是高压导联。临床成功率和完全手术成功率均为 94.6%,无手术相关死亡率或重大并发症。围手术期死亡率为 1.25% (1)。轻微并发症包括左胸袋血肿、左腹股沟血肿和尿潴留。