Ambient pressure carbonation curing of cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregate using coal-fired flue gas for properties enhancement and CO2 sequestration
Xiaoyan Yao , Bing Song , Qun Huan , Yue Hu , Min Song
{"title":"Ambient pressure carbonation curing of cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregate using coal-fired flue gas for properties enhancement and CO2 sequestration","authors":"Xiaoyan Yao , Bing Song , Qun Huan , Yue Hu , Min Song","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2024.114208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the current CO<sub>2</sub> curing process, pure CO<sub>2</sub> gas with a concentration exceeding 99 % is primarily used. However, flue gas, which typically contains 10–30 % CO<sub>2</sub>, can also be utilized for carbonization. This study sought to explore the viability of employing flue gas for carbonation and assessed the impact of impurity gases such as SO<sub>2</sub>. Two typical industrial solid wastes (fly ash and coal gangue) were used to substitute a portion of the cement to prepare light aggregates, which were carbonized under varying concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>. The porosity and water absorption of the samples decreased after carbonation. A higher degree of carbonation was observed at increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Aggregates carbonated with 15 % CO<sub>2</sub> improved the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption by 48 %. The actual CO<sub>2</sub> uptake reached up to 58.3 % of the theoretical value. The presence of SO<sub>2</sub> has been found to impact the uptake of CO<sub>2</sub>. The CO<sub>2</sub> uptake initially declined and then increased as the SO<sub>2</sub> concentration increased. The existence of SO<sub>2</sub> led to varied increases in the leaching concentrations of the aggregates following the process of carbonation, and some even exceed standard limits. In the presence of both CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> reacted with the aggregates, resulting in the creation of calcium sulfate. This reaction disrupted the structure of the aggregate, facilitating the diffusion of CO<sub>2</sub> into the samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 6","pages":"Article 114208"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221334372402339X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the current CO2 curing process, pure CO2 gas with a concentration exceeding 99 % is primarily used. However, flue gas, which typically contains 10–30 % CO2, can also be utilized for carbonization. This study sought to explore the viability of employing flue gas for carbonation and assessed the impact of impurity gases such as SO2. Two typical industrial solid wastes (fly ash and coal gangue) were used to substitute a portion of the cement to prepare light aggregates, which were carbonized under varying concentrations of CO2 and SO2. The porosity and water absorption of the samples decreased after carbonation. A higher degree of carbonation was observed at increasing CO2 concentration. Aggregates carbonated with 15 % CO2 improved the CO2 absorption by 48 %. The actual CO2 uptake reached up to 58.3 % of the theoretical value. The presence of SO2 has been found to impact the uptake of CO2. The CO2 uptake initially declined and then increased as the SO2 concentration increased. The existence of SO2 led to varied increases in the leaching concentrations of the aggregates following the process of carbonation, and some even exceed standard limits. In the presence of both CO2 and SO2, SO2 reacted with the aggregates, resulting in the creation of calcium sulfate. This reaction disrupted the structure of the aggregate, facilitating the diffusion of CO2 into the samples.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.