Standard physical designs of land management technologies and determinants of household adoption intentions in Goyrie watershed, southern Ethiopia

Q2 Environmental Science
{"title":"Standard physical designs of land management technologies and determinants of household adoption intentions in Goyrie watershed, southern Ethiopia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2024.101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adoption of land management technology (LMT) is crucial for minimizing soil erosion and increasing agricultural productivity, both of which are essential components of sustainable development. Therefore, different LMTs have been adopted in the Goyrie Watershed of southern Ethiopia. However, the technical designs of the adopted technologies have not yet been assessed. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the technical designs of adopted LMTs in relation to standards as well as to identify the factors that influence households' intentions to adopt LMT dimensions in the suggested standards. Data were collected through field measurements, observations, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and 291 randomly selected heads of household. Data were analyzed using frequency, mean, standard deviation, and structural equation modeling (SEM). This study found that 30 % of the technical aspects of the adopted LMTs on private farmlands and 12 % on communal lands met the recommended national standards. However, field measurements found that 70 % of private farmlands and 88 % of communal lands in the adopted LMT technical designs failed to fulfill the required national standards. This problem was more pronounced on communal land. The SEM estimation revealed that households’ assumptions about development agents and households’ perceptions of the benefits of LMTs were found to significantly and positively influence the probability of households’ intentions to adopt LMTs in line with the referenced standards. Whereas households trust village memberships, the nature of soil types and training opportunities significantly but negatively predicted the probability of households’ intention to adopt LMTs in relation to standards. The study suggests that national and regional governments provide adequate training opportunities for farmers on how to design and implement LMT dimensions in accordance with recommended standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001793/pdfft?md5=4ffffa7a136bc20b87b2b71c1fcd54f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2667010024001793-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of land management technology (LMT) is crucial for minimizing soil erosion and increasing agricultural productivity, both of which are essential components of sustainable development. Therefore, different LMTs have been adopted in the Goyrie Watershed of southern Ethiopia. However, the technical designs of the adopted technologies have not yet been assessed. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the technical designs of adopted LMTs in relation to standards as well as to identify the factors that influence households' intentions to adopt LMT dimensions in the suggested standards. Data were collected through field measurements, observations, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and 291 randomly selected heads of household. Data were analyzed using frequency, mean, standard deviation, and structural equation modeling (SEM). This study found that 30 % of the technical aspects of the adopted LMTs on private farmlands and 12 % on communal lands met the recommended national standards. However, field measurements found that 70 % of private farmlands and 88 % of communal lands in the adopted LMT technical designs failed to fulfill the required national standards. This problem was more pronounced on communal land. The SEM estimation revealed that households’ assumptions about development agents and households’ perceptions of the benefits of LMTs were found to significantly and positively influence the probability of households’ intentions to adopt LMTs in line with the referenced standards. Whereas households trust village memberships, the nature of soil types and training opportunities significantly but negatively predicted the probability of households’ intention to adopt LMTs in relation to standards. The study suggests that national and regional governments provide adequate training opportunities for farmers on how to design and implement LMT dimensions in accordance with recommended standards.

埃塞俄比亚南部戈伊里流域土地管理技术的标准物理设计和家庭采用意愿的决定因素
采用土地管理技术(LMT)对于最大限度地减少土壤侵蚀和提高农业生产率至关重要,而这两者都是可持续发展的重要组成部分。因此,埃塞俄比亚南部的 Goyrie 流域采用了不同的土地管理技术。然而,尚未对所采用技术的技术设计进行评估。因此,本研究的目的是评估已采用的 LMT 的技术设计与标准的关系,并确定影响家庭采用建议标准中 LMT 方面的意图的因素。通过实地测量、观察、焦点小组讨论、关键信息提供者访谈和随机抽取的 291 位户主收集数据。数据采用频率、平均值、标准差和结构方程模型(SEM)进行分析。研究发现,在私人农田和公有土地上分别有 30% 和 12% 采用的土地管理技术符合推荐的国家标准。然而,实地测量发现,在所采用的 LMT 技术设计中,70% 的私人农田和 88% 的公有土地未能达到所要求的国家标准。这一问题在公有土地上更为突出。SEM 估计表明,住户对开发人员的假设和住户对土地管理模式收益的看法对住户按照参考标准采用土地管理模式的意向概率有显著的正向影响。而住户对村里成员的信任、土壤类型的性质和培训机会则对住户根据标准采用土地管理技术的意向概率有显著但消极的预测作用。研究建议国家和地区政府为农民提供充分的培训机会,使其了解如何根据推荐标准设计和实施土地管理制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信