Comparison of urine and serum IgG detection ELISA for tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis and prognosis

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Comparison of urine and serum IgG detection ELISA for tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis and prognosis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.imbio.2024.152853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laboratorial diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) is hampered by variable sensitivity and/or specificity of the tests, which are still hampered by blood́ invasive collection. In this context, in the present study, we develop a serum- and urine-based ELISA to TL diagnoses. A recombinant protein (rLiHyA), which was previously showed to be antigenic for the disease, as well as a B-cell epitope produced as synthetic peptide and a <em>Leishmania</em> antigenic extract (SLA), were used as antigens. A total of paired 205 urine and serum samples were used, which were comprised by samples from cutaneous (n = 30) and mucosal (n = 30) leishmaniasis patients, as well as from healthy individuals living in endemic region of disease (n = 45), of patients with Chagas disease (n = 30), leprosy (n = 35), malaria (n = 15) or HIV-infected (n = 20). Results showed that serum-based ELISA presented sensitivity of 24.0 %, 100 % and 41.0 %, when SLA, rLiHyA and synthetic peptide were used as antigens, and specificity of 98.4 %, 98.4 % and 98.4 %, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and results were 0.74, 1.0, and 0.71, respectively, when SLA, rLiHyA and synthetic peptide were used as antigens. Performing an urine-based ELISA, sensitivity was 28.0 %, 100 % and 75.0 %, respectively, when SLA, rLiHyA, and synthetic peptide were used, while specificity values were of 98.4 %, 98.4 % and 98.4 %, respectively. In addition, the AUC values were 0.82, 1.0, and 0.94, respectively. A significant drop in specific antibodies levels in both patientś serum and urine samples was found six months after treatment, suggesting a prognostic role of rLiHyA for TL. In conclusion, preliminary data suggest the potential of use patient urine to TL diagnoses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13270,"journal":{"name":"Immunobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0171298524000718/pdfft?md5=c74d279d2152e029a1c8ed1b4745a0fc&pid=1-s2.0-S0171298524000718-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0171298524000718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laboratorial diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) is hampered by variable sensitivity and/or specificity of the tests, which are still hampered by blood́ invasive collection. In this context, in the present study, we develop a serum- and urine-based ELISA to TL diagnoses. A recombinant protein (rLiHyA), which was previously showed to be antigenic for the disease, as well as a B-cell epitope produced as synthetic peptide and a Leishmania antigenic extract (SLA), were used as antigens. A total of paired 205 urine and serum samples were used, which were comprised by samples from cutaneous (n = 30) and mucosal (n = 30) leishmaniasis patients, as well as from healthy individuals living in endemic region of disease (n = 45), of patients with Chagas disease (n = 30), leprosy (n = 35), malaria (n = 15) or HIV-infected (n = 20). Results showed that serum-based ELISA presented sensitivity of 24.0 %, 100 % and 41.0 %, when SLA, rLiHyA and synthetic peptide were used as antigens, and specificity of 98.4 %, 98.4 % and 98.4 %, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and results were 0.74, 1.0, and 0.71, respectively, when SLA, rLiHyA and synthetic peptide were used as antigens. Performing an urine-based ELISA, sensitivity was 28.0 %, 100 % and 75.0 %, respectively, when SLA, rLiHyA, and synthetic peptide were used, while specificity values were of 98.4 %, 98.4 % and 98.4 %, respectively. In addition, the AUC values were 0.82, 1.0, and 0.94, respectively. A significant drop in specific antibodies levels in both patientś serum and urine samples was found six months after treatment, suggesting a prognostic role of rLiHyA for TL. In conclusion, preliminary data suggest the potential of use patient urine to TL diagnoses.

Abstract Image

尿液和血清 IgG 检测 ELISA 在利什曼病诊断和预后方面的比较
皮损利什曼病(TL)的实验室诊断因检测灵敏度和/或特异性的不同而受到阻碍,而血液的侵入性采集仍阻碍着实验室诊断。在这种情况下,我们在本研究中开发了一种基于血清和尿液的酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)来诊断利什曼病。我们使用了一种重组蛋白(rLiHyA)作为抗原,该蛋白之前已被证明对该疾病具有抗原性,同时还使用了一种以合成肽形式产生的 B 细胞表位和一种利什曼病抗原提取物(SLA)作为抗原。共使用了 205 份成对的尿液和血清样本,其中包括皮肤利什曼病患者(30 份)和粘膜利什曼病患者(30 份)的样本,以及生活在疾病流行区的健康人(45 份)、南美锥虫病患者(30 份)、麻风病患者(35 份)、疟疾患者(15 份)或 HIV 感染者(20 份)的样本。结果显示,当使用 SLA、rLiHyA 和合成肽作为抗原时,基于血清的 ELISA 的灵敏度分别为 24.0%、100% 和 41.0%,特异性分别为 98.4%、98.4% 和 98.4%。当使用 SLA、rLiHyA 和合成肽作为抗原时,曲线下面积(AUC)的计算结果分别为 0.74、1.0 和 0.71。在尿液酶联免疫吸附试验中,使用 SLA、rLiHyA 和合成肽时,灵敏度分别为 28.0%、100% 和 75.0%,特异性分别为 98.4%、98.4% 和 98.4%。此外,AUC 值分别为 0.82、1.0 和 0.94。治疗 6 个月后,患者血清和尿液样本中的特异性抗体水平明显下降,这表明 rLiHyA 对 TL 有预后作用。总之,初步数据表明,患者尿液具有诊断 TL 的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunobiology
Immunobiology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Immunobiology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes highly innovative research approaches for a wide range of immunological subjects, including • Innate Immunity, • Adaptive Immunity, • Complement Biology, • Macrophage and Dendritic Cell Biology, • Parasite Immunology, • Tumour Immunology, • Clinical Immunology, • Immunogenetics, • Immunotherapy and • Immunopathology of infectious, allergic and autoimmune disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信