Associations of Partnership Types and Quality on Cognitive Performance Among Midlife and Older Sexual Minority Men With or Without HIV

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Moka Yoo-Jeong, Andrea M. Weinstein, Deanna Ware, Mark Brennan-Ing, Steven Shoptaw, Linda A. Teplin, Sabina A. Haberlen, M. Reuel Friedman, Michael W. Plankey
{"title":"Associations of Partnership Types and Quality on Cognitive Performance Among Midlife and Older Sexual Minority Men With or Without HIV","authors":"Moka Yoo-Jeong, Andrea M. Weinstein, Deanna Ware, Mark Brennan-Ing, Steven Shoptaw, Linda A. Teplin, Sabina A. Haberlen, M. Reuel Friedman, Michael W. Plankey","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04501-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Partnership status among sexual minority men (SMM) is a potentially important yet underexplored predictor of cognitive functioning. Using data from the understanding patterns of healthy aging among men who have sex with men substudy of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, we assessed the associations of partnership status and quality with cognitive performance in middle-aged and older SMM, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Partnership status was classified into four types: “only a primary partnership,” “only a secondary partnership,” “both a primary and secondary relationship,” and “neither a primary nor secondary relationship.” Partnership quality was assessed based on perceived support or strain from partners. Cognitive performance was evaluated using the <i>z</i>-scores on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Trail Making Test Parts A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B), and a composite <i>Z</i>-score that summed the SDMT, TMT-A, and TMT-B <i>z</i>-scores. Among 1067 participants (median age 60, 85.7% college educated), having a primary partner was associated with better cognitive performance (<i>Z</i>-score composite <span>\\(\\widehat{\\upbeta }\\)</span>= 0.41 [95% CI 0.12–0.70]), TMT-A (<span>\\(\\widehat{\\upbeta }\\)</span>= 0.16 [95% CI 0.02–0.30]), and TMT-B (<span>\\(\\widehat{\\upbeta }\\)</span>= 0.19 [95% CI 0.06–0.33]). Support from secondary partners was also linked to better cognition. Additionally, there was a significant interaction between partnership and HIV status, indicating that SMM with HIV and both primary and secondary partners showed better cognitive outcomes than unpartnered SMM with HIV. These findings suggest that having a primary partner and receiving support from secondary partners may contribute to better cognitive health among middle-aged and older SMM, especially those with HIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04501-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partnership status among sexual minority men (SMM) is a potentially important yet underexplored predictor of cognitive functioning. Using data from the understanding patterns of healthy aging among men who have sex with men substudy of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, we assessed the associations of partnership status and quality with cognitive performance in middle-aged and older SMM, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Partnership status was classified into four types: “only a primary partnership,” “only a secondary partnership,” “both a primary and secondary relationship,” and “neither a primary nor secondary relationship.” Partnership quality was assessed based on perceived support or strain from partners. Cognitive performance was evaluated using the z-scores on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Trail Making Test Parts A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B), and a composite Z-score that summed the SDMT, TMT-A, and TMT-B z-scores. Among 1067 participants (median age 60, 85.7% college educated), having a primary partner was associated with better cognitive performance (Z-score composite \(\widehat{\upbeta }\)= 0.41 [95% CI 0.12–0.70]), TMT-A (\(\widehat{\upbeta }\)= 0.16 [95% CI 0.02–0.30]), and TMT-B (\(\widehat{\upbeta }\)= 0.19 [95% CI 0.06–0.33]). Support from secondary partners was also linked to better cognition. Additionally, there was a significant interaction between partnership and HIV status, indicating that SMM with HIV and both primary and secondary partners showed better cognitive outcomes than unpartnered SMM with HIV. These findings suggest that having a primary partner and receiving support from secondary partners may contribute to better cognitive health among middle-aged and older SMM, especially those with HIV.

Abstract Image

伴侣关系类型和质量对感染或未感染艾滋病毒的中老年少数性倾向男性认知能力的影响
性少数群体男性(SMM)的伴侣关系状况可能是预测认知功能的一个重要因素,但这一因素尚未得到充分探索。我们利用 "多中心艾滋病队列研究"(Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study)男男性行为者健康老龄化理解模式子研究的数据,评估了伴侣关系状态和质量与中老年 SMM 认知能力的关系,并对社会人口学和临床协变量进行了调整。伴侣关系状态分为四种类型:"只有主要伙伴关系"、"只有次要伙伴关系"、"既有主要关系又有次要关系 "和 "既没有主要关系也没有次要关系"。伙伴关系的质量是根据感知到的来自伙伴的支持或压力来评估的。认知能力的评估采用符号数字模型测试(SDMT)、路径制作测试 A 部分(TMT-A)和 B 部分(TMT-B)的 Z 分数,以及将 SDMT、TMT-A 和 TMT-B Z 分数相加的综合 Z 分数。在 1067 名参与者(中位数年龄为 60 岁,85.7% 接受过大学教育)中,有一个主要伴侣与更好的认知表现相关(Z-score composite \(\widehat{\upbeta }\)= 0.41 [95% CI 0.12-0.70]), TMT-A (\(\widehat{\upbeta }\)= 0.16 [95% CI 0.02-0.30]), and TMT-B (\(\widehat{\upbeta }\)= 0.19 [95% CI 0.06-0.33]).来自第二伙伴的支持也与更好的认知有关。此外,伴侣关系与艾滋病病毒感染状况之间存在显著的交互作用,这表明与无伴侣的艾滋病病毒感染者相比,艾滋病病毒感染者的主要伴侣和次要伴侣都显示出更好的认知结果。这些研究结果表明,在中老年SMM中,尤其是那些感染了艾滋病毒的SMM中,拥有主要伴侣并得到次要伴侣的支持可能有助于改善他们的认知健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信