Preoperative frailty and postoperative complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ángel Becerra-Bolaños, Yanira Hernández-Aguiar, Aurelio Rodríguez-Pérez
{"title":"Preoperative frailty and postoperative complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review","authors":"Ángel Becerra-Bolaños, Yanira Hernández-Aguiar, Aurelio Rodríguez-Pérez","doi":"10.1177/03000605241274553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveMany tools have been used to assess frailty in the perioperative setting. However, no single scale has been shown to be the most effective in predicting postoperative complications. We evaluated the relationship between several frailty scales and the occurrence of complications following different non-cardiac surgeries.MethodsThis systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023473401). The search strategy included PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase, covering manuscripts published from January 2000 to July 2023. We included prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated frailty using specific scales and tracked patients postoperatively. Studies on cardiac, neurosurgical, and thoracic surgery were excluded because of the impact of underlying diseases on patients’ functional status. Narrative reviews, conference abstracts, and articles lacking a comprehensive definition of frailty were excluded.ResultsOf the 2204 articles identified, 145 were included in the review: 7 on non-cardiac surgery, 36 on general and digestive surgery, 19 on urology, 22 on vascular surgery, 36 on spinal surgery, and 25 on orthopedic/trauma surgery. The reviewed manuscripts confirmed that various frailty scales had been used to predict postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay across these surgical disciplines.ConclusionDespite differences among surgical populations, preoperative frailty assessment consistently predicts postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgeries.","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241274553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveMany tools have been used to assess frailty in the perioperative setting. However, no single scale has been shown to be the most effective in predicting postoperative complications. We evaluated the relationship between several frailty scales and the occurrence of complications following different non-cardiac surgeries.MethodsThis systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023473401). The search strategy included PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase, covering manuscripts published from January 2000 to July 2023. We included prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated frailty using specific scales and tracked patients postoperatively. Studies on cardiac, neurosurgical, and thoracic surgery were excluded because of the impact of underlying diseases on patients’ functional status. Narrative reviews, conference abstracts, and articles lacking a comprehensive definition of frailty were excluded.ResultsOf the 2204 articles identified, 145 were included in the review: 7 on non-cardiac surgery, 36 on general and digestive surgery, 19 on urology, 22 on vascular surgery, 36 on spinal surgery, and 25 on orthopedic/trauma surgery. The reviewed manuscripts confirmed that various frailty scales had been used to predict postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay across these surgical disciplines.ConclusionDespite differences among surgical populations, preoperative frailty assessment consistently predicts postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgeries.
术前虚弱与非心脏手术后并发症:系统性综述
目标许多工具都被用于评估围手术期的虚弱程度。然而,没有一种量表能最有效地预测术后并发症。我们评估了几种虚弱量表与不同非心脏手术后并发症发生率之间的关系。方法本系统性综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023473401)上注册。检索策略包括 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Embase,涵盖 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间发表的手稿。我们纳入了使用特定量表评估虚弱程度并追踪患者术后情况的前瞻性和回顾性研究。由于潜在疾病对患者功能状态的影响,有关心脏、神经外科和胸外科手术的研究被排除在外。此外,还排除了叙述性综述、会议摘要以及缺乏对虚弱的全面定义的文章:其中 7 篇涉及非心脏外科手术,36 篇涉及普通和消化外科手术,19 篇涉及泌尿外科手术,22 篇涉及血管外科手术,36 篇涉及脊柱外科手术,25 篇涉及骨科/创伤外科手术。经审查的手稿证实,在这些外科领域中,各种虚弱量表已被用于预测术后并发症、死亡率和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信