Factors that influence vaccination communication during pregnancy: provider and patient perspectives using the theoretical domains framework.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrea M Patey,Mungunzul M Amarbayan,Kate Lee,Marcia Bruce,Julie A Bettinger,Wendy Pringle,Maoliosa Donald,Eliana Castillo
{"title":"Factors that influence vaccination communication during pregnancy: provider and patient perspectives using the theoretical domains framework.","authors":"Andrea M Patey,Mungunzul M Amarbayan,Kate Lee,Marcia Bruce,Julie A Bettinger,Wendy Pringle,Maoliosa Donald,Eliana Castillo","doi":"10.1097/xeb.0000000000000460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nVaccination during pregnancy is recommended but uptake is low and evidence on the topic is limited.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nThis study aimed to identify the drivers of current behavior and barriers to change for health care practitioners (HCPs) and pregnant patients in Canada.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study is an in-depth qualitative investigation of the factors influencing HCPs' vaccination communication during pregnancy, as well as factors influencing pregnant patients' vaccination uptake in Canada using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Three data sources were used: (1) perinatal HCP interviews before COVID-19; (2) perinatal HCP interviews regarding vaccine communication after COVID-19; and (3) survey of pregnant or lactating women after COVID-19.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nForty-seven interviews and 169 participant responses were included. Perinatal HCPs reported limited information on vaccine communication or difficulty keeping up-to-date (Environmental context and resources; Knowledge; Beliefs about capabilities). HCPs lacked confidence and struggled with lack of training to address vaccine hesitancy without alienating patients (Beliefs about capabilities; Skills). Pregnant or lactating women struggled with the amount of information they felt was imposed on them, had concerns about the perceived negative consequences of vaccination, and felt pressure to understand what was best for them and their babies (Knowledge; Beliefs about consequences; Social influences).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur study provides a theory-based approach to identify influencing factors that can be mapped to theory-based intervention components, improving the likelihood of intervention effectiveness. The study is the first step in adapting an existing intervention to improve vaccine communication during pregnancy, ultimately, increasing vaccination uptake.\r\n\r\nSPANISH ABSTRACT\r\nhttp://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A260.","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":"508 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Vaccination during pregnancy is recommended but uptake is low and evidence on the topic is limited. AIMS This study aimed to identify the drivers of current behavior and barriers to change for health care practitioners (HCPs) and pregnant patients in Canada. METHODS This study is an in-depth qualitative investigation of the factors influencing HCPs' vaccination communication during pregnancy, as well as factors influencing pregnant patients' vaccination uptake in Canada using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Three data sources were used: (1) perinatal HCP interviews before COVID-19; (2) perinatal HCP interviews regarding vaccine communication after COVID-19; and (3) survey of pregnant or lactating women after COVID-19. RESULTS Forty-seven interviews and 169 participant responses were included. Perinatal HCPs reported limited information on vaccine communication or difficulty keeping up-to-date (Environmental context and resources; Knowledge; Beliefs about capabilities). HCPs lacked confidence and struggled with lack of training to address vaccine hesitancy without alienating patients (Beliefs about capabilities; Skills). Pregnant or lactating women struggled with the amount of information they felt was imposed on them, had concerns about the perceived negative consequences of vaccination, and felt pressure to understand what was best for them and their babies (Knowledge; Beliefs about consequences; Social influences). CONCLUSIONS Our study provides a theory-based approach to identify influencing factors that can be mapped to theory-based intervention components, improving the likelihood of intervention effectiveness. The study is the first step in adapting an existing intervention to improve vaccine communication during pregnancy, ultimately, increasing vaccination uptake. SPANISH ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A260.
影响孕期疫苗接种沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架的提供者和患者观点。
本研究旨在确定加拿大医疗保健从业人员(HCPs)和孕妇患者当前行为的驱动因素和改变的障碍。本研究采用理论领域框架,对影响加拿大医疗保健从业人员孕期疫苗接种沟通的因素以及影响孕妇患者疫苗接种率的因素进行了深入的定性调查。研究使用了三种数据来源:(1) COVID-19 之前的围产期保健医生访谈;(2) COVID-19 之后围产期保健医生关于疫苗沟通的访谈;(3) COVID-19 之后对孕妇或哺乳期妇女的调查。围产期保健医生报告称,有关疫苗传播的信息有限或难以及时更新(环境背景和资源;知识;对能力的信念)。保健医生缺乏自信,并苦于缺乏在不疏远患者的情况下解决疫苗犹豫问题的培训(能力信念;技能)。孕妇或哺乳期妇女难以承受强加给她们的大量信息,担心接种疫苗会带来负面影响,并感到压力,必须了解什么对她们和婴儿最有利(知识;对后果的看法;社会影响)。结论我们的研究提供了一种基于理论的方法来确定影响因素,这些因素可以映射到基于理论的干预内容,从而提高干预效果的可能性。该研究是调整现有干预措施以改善孕期疫苗沟通的第一步,最终将提高疫苗接种率。西班牙文摘要http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A260。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信