Sleep-related measurements to assess sleep disturbances among people living with dementia in nursing homes: a systematic review

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jonas Dörner, Kathrin Wehner, Margareta Halek, Martin N. Dichter
{"title":"Sleep-related measurements to assess sleep disturbances among people living with dementia in nursing homes: a systematic review","authors":"Jonas Dörner, Kathrin Wehner, Margareta Halek, Martin N. Dichter","doi":"10.1017/s104161022400070x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background:</span><p>There is a high prevalence of sleep disturbances among people living with dementia (PLWD) in nursing homes. Reliable and valid measurements are needed to assess these disturbances. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, analyze and synthesize studies of sleep-related measurements to assess sleep disturbances in PLWD.</p><span>Methods:</span><p>The databases PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were systematically searched in 2019; the search was updated in March 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: participants with dementia or probable dementia in any care setting; and studies that reported at least one of the following aspects: (I) theoretical and conceptual frameworks, (II) user or patient involvement by type of users in measurement development, (III) feasibility and practicability of measurements, and (IV) results of psychometric analyses. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria and the quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) tool.</p><span>Results:</span><p>A total of 5169 studies were identified; ultimately, 15 studies describing three self-administered measurements, three proxy-administered measurements and two technological measurements were included. No sleep-related measurement showed acceptable psychometric properties in any of the COSMIN domains.</p><span>Conclusions:</span><p>No measurement without adaptation can be recommended for PLWD in nursing homes. If existing measurements are used in clinical practice, the self-perspective of PLWD should be taken into account. If this is no longer fully possible, proxy-rating perspectives in combination could be an option. Future research on sleep-related measurements should be strictly based on international consensus-based psychometric quality criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s104161022400070x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

There is a high prevalence of sleep disturbances among people living with dementia (PLWD) in nursing homes. Reliable and valid measurements are needed to assess these disturbances. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, analyze and synthesize studies of sleep-related measurements to assess sleep disturbances in PLWD.

Methods:

The databases PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were systematically searched in 2019; the search was updated in March 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: participants with dementia or probable dementia in any care setting; and studies that reported at least one of the following aspects: (I) theoretical and conceptual frameworks, (II) user or patient involvement by type of users in measurement development, (III) feasibility and practicability of measurements, and (IV) results of psychometric analyses. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria and the quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) tool.

Results:

A total of 5169 studies were identified; ultimately, 15 studies describing three self-administered measurements, three proxy-administered measurements and two technological measurements were included. No sleep-related measurement showed acceptable psychometric properties in any of the COSMIN domains.

Conclusions:

No measurement without adaptation can be recommended for PLWD in nursing homes. If existing measurements are used in clinical practice, the self-perspective of PLWD should be taken into account. If this is no longer fully possible, proxy-rating perspectives in combination could be an option. Future research on sleep-related measurements should be strictly based on international consensus-based psychometric quality criteria.

评估疗养院痴呆症患者睡眠障碍的睡眠相关测量方法:系统综述
背景:养老院中的痴呆症患者(PLWD)普遍存在睡眠障碍。需要可靠有效的测量方法来评估这些障碍。本系统性综述旨在识别、分析和综合与睡眠相关的测量方法研究,以评估痴呆症患者的睡眠障碍。方法:2019年系统检索了PubMed、CINAHL和PsycINFO数据库;2024年3月更新了检索。纳入标准如下:任何护理环境中患有痴呆症或可能患有痴呆症的参与者;至少报告了以下一个方面的研究:(I) 理论和概念框架,(II) 按用户类型划分的用户或患者参与测量开发,(III) 测量的可行性和实用性,(IV) 心理测量学分析结果。采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)和诊断可靠性研究质量评估工具(QAREL)对纳入研究的质量进行了评估。结果:共确定了 5169 项研究,最终纳入了 15 项研究,其中包括 3 项自我管理测量、3 项代理管理测量和 2 项技术测量。结论:对于疗养院中的 PLWD,不建议使用未经调整的测量方法。如果在临床实践中使用现有的测量方法,则应考虑到 PLWD 的自我视角。如果已无法完全做到这一点,则可将代理评分视角结合起来。未来有关睡眠相关测量的研究应严格遵守基于国际共识的心理测量质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信