Femoral anteversion angle is more advantageous than TT-TG distance in evaluating patellar dislocation: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Jiahui Chen,Xinlong Ma,Jianxiong Ma,Shixiong Zhang,Ying Wang,Haohao Bai,Bin Lu,Yanfei Wu,Jing Dai
{"title":"Femoral anteversion angle is more advantageous than TT-TG distance in evaluating patellar dislocation: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jiahui Chen,Xinlong Ma,Jianxiong Ma,Shixiong Zhang,Ying Wang,Haohao Bai,Bin Lu,Yanfei Wu,Jing Dai","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe purpose of this study is to report the parameter characteristics of the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance in patients with patellar instability compared to healthy individuals and to evaluate their reliability in predicting patellar dislocation, providing potential indications for osteotomy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA retrospective collection of consecutive patients with patellar instability constituted the study group, while individuals without patellofemoral disorder served as the control group. Measurement of the FAA and TT-TG distance were conducted by lower extremity computed tomography scans and knees with true patellar dislocation were recorded. The diagnostic capability of the FAA and TT-TG distance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC), determining the pathological values by sensitivity and specificity.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe FAA (21.6 ± 9.0°) and TT-TG distance (20.1 ± 4.8 mm) in the study group were significantly greater than the control group (10.6 ± 7.9° and 15.6 ± 4.6 mm, respectively) (p < 0.001). The AUCs for patellar dislocation were 0.869 for FAA and 0.712 for TT-TG distance, with pathological cut-off values of 18.2° and 18.2 mm, respectively. The odds ratios for FAA and TT-TG distance were 1.185 and 1.125, respectively (p < 0.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPatients with patellar instability exhibited significantly greater FAA and TT-TG distance compared to healthy individuals. The FAA demonstrated superior predictive capability for patellar dislocation compared to the TT-TG distance. The FAA (>18.2°) measured by surgical transepicondylar axis and TT-TG distance (>18.2 mm) were the potential pathological thresholds. Additionally, an increase of 1° in FAA and 1 mm in TT-TG distance was associated with a 18.5% and 12.5% increased risk of patellar dislocation, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of patellar dislocation associated with rotational malalignment.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nLevel III.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to report the parameter characteristics of the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance in patients with patellar instability compared to healthy individuals and to evaluate their reliability in predicting patellar dislocation, providing potential indications for osteotomy. METHODS A retrospective collection of consecutive patients with patellar instability constituted the study group, while individuals without patellofemoral disorder served as the control group. Measurement of the FAA and TT-TG distance were conducted by lower extremity computed tomography scans and knees with true patellar dislocation were recorded. The diagnostic capability of the FAA and TT-TG distance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC), determining the pathological values by sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS The FAA (21.6 ± 9.0°) and TT-TG distance (20.1 ± 4.8 mm) in the study group were significantly greater than the control group (10.6 ± 7.9° and 15.6 ± 4.6 mm, respectively) (p < 0.001). The AUCs for patellar dislocation were 0.869 for FAA and 0.712 for TT-TG distance, with pathological cut-off values of 18.2° and 18.2 mm, respectively. The odds ratios for FAA and TT-TG distance were 1.185 and 1.125, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with patellar instability exhibited significantly greater FAA and TT-TG distance compared to healthy individuals. The FAA demonstrated superior predictive capability for patellar dislocation compared to the TT-TG distance. The FAA (>18.2°) measured by surgical transepicondylar axis and TT-TG distance (>18.2 mm) were the potential pathological thresholds. Additionally, an increase of 1° in FAA and 1 mm in TT-TG distance was associated with a 18.5% and 12.5% increased risk of patellar dislocation, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of patellar dislocation associated with rotational malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
在评估髌骨脱位时,股骨内翻角比TT-TG距离更有优势:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的本研究旨在报告与健康人相比,髌骨不稳患者的股骨内翻角(FAA)和胫骨结节-胫骨沟(TT-TG)距离的参数特征,并评估其预测髌骨脱位的可靠性,为截骨术提供潜在的适应症。方法回顾性收集连续的髌骨不稳患者作为研究组,无髌股关节疾病者作为对照组。通过下肢计算机断层扫描测量 FAA 和 TT-TG 距离,并记录有真正髌骨脱位的膝关节。使用接收器操作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估 FAA 和 TT-TG 距离的诊断能力,通过敏感性和特异性确定病理值。研究组的 FAA(21.6 ± 9.0°)和 TT-TG 距离(20.1 ± 4.8 mm)明显大于对照组(分别为 10.6 ± 7.9°和 15.6 ± 4.6 mm)(P 18.2°)。此外,FAA和TT-TG距离每增加1°,髌骨脱位的风险分别增加18.5%和12.5%。外科医生应注意与旋转错位相关的髌骨脱位风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信