{"title":"The Role of Residential Segregation in Treatment and Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast","authors":"Oumarou Nabi, Ying Liu, James Struthers, Min Lian","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It remains unclear if residential segregation impacts on clinical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a nonobligate precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study included adult non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Black (NHB) women diagnosed with unilateral DCIS between January 1990 and December 2015, followed through December 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. County-level racialized economic segregation was measured using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes. Multilevel logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression accounting for county-level clustering were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of local treatment, and hazard ratios (HRs) of subsequent IBC and mortality. Results: Of 103,898 cases, mean age was 59.5 years, 12.5% were NHB, 87.5% were NHW, 97.5% underwent surgery, 64.5% received radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery, 7.1% developed IBC, and 18.6% died from all causes. Among women living in the least vs most privileged counties, we observed higher odds of receiving mastectomy (vs breast-conserving surgery) (OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.35-1.69; Ptrend<0.001) and radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51; Ptrend<0.01); the risk was higher in subsequent ipsilateral IBC (HR=1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32; Ptrend=0.04), not in breast cancer-specific mortality (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.23; Ptrend=0.56). Conclusions: The results provide evidence for disparities in clinical treatment for DCIS and prognostic outcomes among women in racially and economically segregated counties. Impact: Our findings may inform geographically targeted multilevel interventions to reduce breast cancer burden and improve breast cancer care and equity.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It remains unclear if residential segregation impacts on clinical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a nonobligate precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study included adult non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Black (NHB) women diagnosed with unilateral DCIS between January 1990 and December 2015, followed through December 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. County-level racialized economic segregation was measured using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes. Multilevel logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression accounting for county-level clustering were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of local treatment, and hazard ratios (HRs) of subsequent IBC and mortality. Results: Of 103,898 cases, mean age was 59.5 years, 12.5% were NHB, 87.5% were NHW, 97.5% underwent surgery, 64.5% received radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery, 7.1% developed IBC, and 18.6% died from all causes. Among women living in the least vs most privileged counties, we observed higher odds of receiving mastectomy (vs breast-conserving surgery) (OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.35-1.69; Ptrend<0.001) and radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51; Ptrend<0.01); the risk was higher in subsequent ipsilateral IBC (HR=1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32; Ptrend=0.04), not in breast cancer-specific mortality (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.23; Ptrend=0.56). Conclusions: The results provide evidence for disparities in clinical treatment for DCIS and prognostic outcomes among women in racially and economically segregated counties. Impact: Our findings may inform geographically targeted multilevel interventions to reduce breast cancer burden and improve breast cancer care and equity.
背景:乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)是侵袭性乳腺癌(IBC)的非潜在前体,目前尚不清楚居住地隔离是否会影响其临床治疗和预后。研究方法这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究纳入了1990年1月至2015年12月期间被诊断为单侧DCIS的非西班牙裔白人(NHW)和黑人(NHB)成年女性,随访至2016年12月,并从 "监测、流行病学和最终结果 "数据集中识别。县级种族化经济隔离采用极端集中指数(Index of Concentration at the Extremmes)进行测量。多层次逻辑回归和考克斯比例危害回归考虑了县级聚类,用于估计当地治疗的几率比(ORs)以及后续 IBC 和死亡率的危害比(HRs)。结果:在 103,898 个病例中,平均年龄为 59.5 岁,12.5% 为非华裔女性,87.5% 为非华裔女性,97.5% 接受了手术,64.5% 在保乳手术后接受了放疗,7.1% 发展为 IBC,18.6% 死于各种原因。在生活条件最差的县与生活条件最好的县的妇女中,我们观察到接受乳房切除术(与保乳手术相比)(OR=1.51,95% CI 1.35-1.69;Ptrend<0.001)和保乳手术后接受放射治疗(OR=1.27,95% CI 1.07-1.51;Ptrend<0.01);随后同侧 IBC 的风险更高(HR=1.16,95% CI 1.02-1.32;Ptrend=0.04),而乳腺癌特异性死亡率(HR=1.04,95% CI 0.88-1.23;Ptrend=0.56)则不高。结论研究结果证明,在种族和经济隔离县的妇女中,DCIS 的临床治疗和预后结果存在差异。影响:我们的研究结果可为有地域针对性的多层次干预措施提供信息,以减轻乳腺癌负担并改善乳腺癌护理和公平性。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.