Mapping the complexity of task demands during constant observation of patients with complex health behaviors.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julie Broski,Krista Eckels,Michael Blomquist,Naomi King,Matthew Lineberry
{"title":"Mapping the complexity of task demands during constant observation of patients with complex health behaviors.","authors":"Julie Broski,Krista Eckels,Michael Blomquist,Naomi King,Matthew Lineberry","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10366-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlicensed patient care assistants (PCAs) are often tasked with providing constant observation (CO) of patients with complex health behaviors. The unique demands of CO are poorly understood, making it challenging to design effective training. Four-component instructional design theory suggests the tasks associated with CO feature non-recurrent challenges, such that effective, simulation-based deliberate practice must reflect real-life variability. This study aimed to elucidate the variety of challenges PCAs encounter during CO of patients with complex health behaviors. We used a qualitative descriptive design and developed a preliminary framework to code interviews. The data collection framework was designed to support creating numerous realistic scenarios to support generalized and transferable learning. From our interviews with 16 participants, we identified 1,066 statements associated with variations in CO tasks. We grouped our findings by two domains, \"patient factors\" and \"environmental contexts.\" Our results revealed many recurring and non-recurring challenges inherent in CO, requiring a range of skills to maintain patient and staff safety. Instructional design elements may include scenarios incorporating environment and resource assessment, cognitive feedback for non-recurrent tasks, novel methods of self-harm initiated by the patient, and incorporating interdisciplinary staff in which the learner must navigate a complex conversation. This study clarifies the task demands of CO and is useful as a task analysis to guide scenario development for simulation-based experiences. A less systematic approach would risk underrepresenting the difficulties inherent in the task, reinforcing a limited set of behaviors that may not generalize well to the non-recurrent challenges in CO.","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10366-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlicensed patient care assistants (PCAs) are often tasked with providing constant observation (CO) of patients with complex health behaviors. The unique demands of CO are poorly understood, making it challenging to design effective training. Four-component instructional design theory suggests the tasks associated with CO feature non-recurrent challenges, such that effective, simulation-based deliberate practice must reflect real-life variability. This study aimed to elucidate the variety of challenges PCAs encounter during CO of patients with complex health behaviors. We used a qualitative descriptive design and developed a preliminary framework to code interviews. The data collection framework was designed to support creating numerous realistic scenarios to support generalized and transferable learning. From our interviews with 16 participants, we identified 1,066 statements associated with variations in CO tasks. We grouped our findings by two domains, "patient factors" and "environmental contexts." Our results revealed many recurring and non-recurring challenges inherent in CO, requiring a range of skills to maintain patient and staff safety. Instructional design elements may include scenarios incorporating environment and resource assessment, cognitive feedback for non-recurrent tasks, novel methods of self-harm initiated by the patient, and incorporating interdisciplinary staff in which the learner must navigate a complex conversation. This study clarifies the task demands of CO and is useful as a task analysis to guide scenario development for simulation-based experiences. A less systematic approach would risk underrepresenting the difficulties inherent in the task, reinforcing a limited set of behaviors that may not generalize well to the non-recurrent challenges in CO.
在对有复杂健康行为的病人进行持续观察期间,绘制任务需求的复杂性图谱。
无证病人护理助理(PCA)的任务通常是对有复杂健康行为的病人进行持续观察(CO)。人们对持续观察的独特要求知之甚少,因此设计有效的培训极具挑战性。四要素教学设计理论表明,与持续观察相关的任务具有非重复性挑战的特点,因此有效的、基于模拟的刻意练习必须反映现实生活中的可变性。本研究旨在阐明 PCAs 在对有复杂健康行为的患者进行 CO 时遇到的各种挑战。我们采用了定性描述设计,并制定了一个初步框架来对访谈进行编码。数据收集框架的设计旨在支持创建大量现实场景,以支持普遍化和可迁移的学习。通过对 16 名参与者的访谈,我们确定了与 CO 任务的变化相关的 1,066 项陈述。我们按 "患者因素 "和 "环境背景 "两个领域对调查结果进行了分组。我们的结果表明,在继续治疗过程中会遇到许多反复出现和非反复出现的挑战,这需要一系列技能来维护患者和医务人员的安全。教学设计要素可包括结合环境和资源评估的情景、非重复任务的认知反馈、由患者发起的自残新方法,以及学习者必须在复杂对话中与跨学科工作人员进行交流。这项研究明确了《胸腔穿刺术》的任务要求,可作为任务分析来指导模拟体验的情景开发。如果采用不那么系统的方法,则有可能无法充分反映任务中固有的困难,强化有限的行为集,而这些行为集可能无法很好地推广到 CO 中的非重复性挑战中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信