Bridging the Cybersecurity Skills Gap: Knowledge Framework Comparative Study

IF 2.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zaina Dkaidek, Awais Rashid
{"title":"Bridging the Cybersecurity Skills Gap: Knowledge Framework Comparative Study","authors":"Zaina Dkaidek, Awais Rashid","doi":"10.1109/msec.2024.3428892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations worldwide face challenges in recruiting personnel with the necessary cybersecurity knowledge due to a global skills shortage. This article analyzes four knowledge frameworks—CyBOK, CSEC2017, NICE, and CST to guide educators, curriculum designers, professionals, and students in selecting the best framework for their needs.","PeriodicalId":13152,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Security & Privacy","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Security & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/msec.2024.3428892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations worldwide face challenges in recruiting personnel with the necessary cybersecurity knowledge due to a global skills shortage. This article analyzes four knowledge frameworks—CyBOK, CSEC2017, NICE, and CST to guide educators, curriculum designers, professionals, and students in selecting the best framework for their needs.
缩小网络安全技能差距:知识框架比较研究
由于全球技能短缺,世界各地的组织在招聘具备必要网络安全知识的人员方面面临挑战。本文分析了四种知识框架--CyBOK、CSEC2017、NICE 和 CST,以指导教育工作者、课程设计者、专业人员和学生选择最适合其需求的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Security & Privacy
IEEE Security & Privacy 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Security & Privacy’s primary objective is to stimulate and track advances in security, privacy, and dependability and present these advances in a form that can be useful to a broad cross-section of the professional community—ranging from academic researchers to industry practitioners. It provides articles with both a practical and research bent by the top thinkers in the field of security and privacy, along with case studies, surveys, tutorials, columns, and in-depth interviews and podcasts for the information security industry. Through special issues, the magazine explores other timely aspects of privacy in areas such as usable security, the Internet of Things, cloud computing, cryptography, and big data. Other popular topics include software, hardware, network, and systems security, privacy-enhancing technologies, data analytics for security and privacy, wireless/mobile and embedded security, security foundations, security economics, privacy policies, integrated design methods, sociotechnical aspects, and critical infrastructure. In addition, the magazine accepts peer-reviewed articles of wide interest under a general call, and also features regular columns on hot topics and interviews with luminaries in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信