Systematic Evaluation of Affinity Enrichment Methods for O-GlcNAc Proteomics

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Chunyan Hou, Ci Wu, Zichun Wu, Yifan Cheng, Weiyu Li, Hui Sun, Junfeng Ma
{"title":"Systematic Evaluation of Affinity Enrichment Methods for O-GlcNAc Proteomics","authors":"Chunyan Hou, Ci Wu, Zichun Wu, Yifan Cheng, Weiyu Li, Hui Sun, Junfeng Ma","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O-Linked β-<i>N</i>-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification (i.e., O-GlcNAcylation) on proteins plays critical roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. However, protein O-GlcNAcylation analysis, especially at a large scale, has been a challenge. So far, a number of enrichment materials and methods have been developed for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics in different biological settings. Despite the presence of multiple methods, their performance for the O-GlcNAc proteomics is largely unclear. In this work, by using the lysates of PANC-1 cells (a pancreatic cancer cell line), we provided a head-to-head comparison of three affinity enrichment methods and materials (i.e., antibody, lectin AANL6, and an OGA mutant) for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics. The enriched peptides were analyzed by HCD product-dependent EThcD (i.e., HCD-pd-EThcD) mass spectrometry. The resulting data files were processed by three different data analysis packages (i.e., Sequest HT, Byonic, and FragPipe). Our data suggest that each method captures a subpopulation of the O-GlcNAc proteins. Besides the enrichment methods, we also observe complementarity between the different data analysis tools. Thus, combining different approaches holds promise for enhanced coverage of O-GlcNAc proteomics.","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

O-Linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification (i.e., O-GlcNAcylation) on proteins plays critical roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. However, protein O-GlcNAcylation analysis, especially at a large scale, has been a challenge. So far, a number of enrichment materials and methods have been developed for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics in different biological settings. Despite the presence of multiple methods, their performance for the O-GlcNAc proteomics is largely unclear. In this work, by using the lysates of PANC-1 cells (a pancreatic cancer cell line), we provided a head-to-head comparison of three affinity enrichment methods and materials (i.e., antibody, lectin AANL6, and an OGA mutant) for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics. The enriched peptides were analyzed by HCD product-dependent EThcD (i.e., HCD-pd-EThcD) mass spectrometry. The resulting data files were processed by three different data analysis packages (i.e., Sequest HT, Byonic, and FragPipe). Our data suggest that each method captures a subpopulation of the O-GlcNAc proteins. Besides the enrichment methods, we also observe complementarity between the different data analysis tools. Thus, combining different approaches holds promise for enhanced coverage of O-GlcNAc proteomics.

Abstract Image

系统评估用于 O-谷氨酰核糖蛋白质组学的亲和富集方法
蛋白质上的 O-连接β-N-乙酰葡糖胺(O-GlcNAc)修饰(即 O-GlcNAcylation)在调控多种生物过程中发挥着关键作用。然而,蛋白质的 O-GlcNAcylation 分析,尤其是大规模分析,一直是个难题。迄今为止,已经开发出了许多富集材料和方法,用于在不同的生物环境中进行特定位点的 O-GlcNAc 蛋白组学研究。尽管存在多种方法,但它们在 O-GlcNAc 蛋白组学方面的性能还很不清楚。在这项工作中,我们利用 PANC-1 细胞(一种胰腺癌细胞系)的裂解液,对三种亲和富集方法和材料(即抗体、凝集素 AANL6 和 OGA 突变体)进行了正面比较,以进行特异性 O-GlcNAc 蛋白组学研究。富集的肽段通过 HCD 产物依赖性 EThcD(即 HCD-pd-EThcD)质谱进行分析。得到的数据文件由三种不同的数据分析软件包(即 Sequest HT、Byonic 和 FragPipe)处理。我们的数据表明,每种方法都能捕捉到 O-GlcNAc 蛋白的一个亚群。除了富集方法,我们还观察到不同数据分析工具之间的互补性。因此,结合不同的方法有望提高 O-GlcNAc 蛋白组学的覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信