Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Extracellular Matrix Soft Tissue Bioscaffolds.

Tarek Kollmetz,Fernanda Castillo-Alcala,Robert W F Veale,Navid Taghavi,Vonne M van Heeswijk,Maarten Persenaire,Barnaby C H May,Sandi Grainne Dempsey
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Extracellular Matrix Soft Tissue Bioscaffolds.","authors":"Tarek Kollmetz,Fernanda Castillo-Alcala,Robert W F Veale,Navid Taghavi,Vonne M van Heeswijk,Maarten Persenaire,Barnaby C H May,Sandi Grainne Dempsey","doi":"10.1089/ten.tea.2024.0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) products are widely established for soft tissue repair, reconstruction and reinforcement. These regenerative biomaterials mimic native tissue ECM with respect to structure and biology and are produced from a range of tissue sources and species. Optimal source tissue processing requires a balance between removal of cellular material and the preservation of structural and biological properties of tissue ECM. Despite the wide-spread clinical use of dECM products there is a lack of comparative information on these products Structurally, some dECM products showed a well-preserved collagen architecture with a broad porosity distribution, while others showed a significantly altered structure compared with native tissue. Decellularization varied across the products. Some materials surveyed (OFMm, PPN, PPC, OFMo, UBM, SISz, ADM, PADM and BADM) were essentially devoid of nuclear bodies (mean count of <5 cells per high powered field (HPF)), whereas others (SISu and SISb) demonstrated an abundance of nuclear bodies (>50 cells per HPF). Pathology assessment of the products demonstrated that OFMm, OFMo and PADM had the highest qualitative assessment score for collagen fiber orientation and arrangement, matrix porosity, decellularization efficiency, and residual vascular channels scoring 10.5±0.8, 12.8±1.0, and 9.7±0.7 out of a maximum total score of 16, respectively This analysis of commercially available dECM products in terms of their structure and cellularity includes 12 different commercial materials The findings highlight the variability of the products in terms of matrix structure and the efficacy of decellularization.","PeriodicalId":23133,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering Part A","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2024.0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) products are widely established for soft tissue repair, reconstruction and reinforcement. These regenerative biomaterials mimic native tissue ECM with respect to structure and biology and are produced from a range of tissue sources and species. Optimal source tissue processing requires a balance between removal of cellular material and the preservation of structural and biological properties of tissue ECM. Despite the wide-spread clinical use of dECM products there is a lack of comparative information on these products Structurally, some dECM products showed a well-preserved collagen architecture with a broad porosity distribution, while others showed a significantly altered structure compared with native tissue. Decellularization varied across the products. Some materials surveyed (OFMm, PPN, PPC, OFMo, UBM, SISz, ADM, PADM and BADM) were essentially devoid of nuclear bodies (mean count of <5 cells per high powered field (HPF)), whereas others (SISu and SISb) demonstrated an abundance of nuclear bodies (>50 cells per HPF). Pathology assessment of the products demonstrated that OFMm, OFMo and PADM had the highest qualitative assessment score for collagen fiber orientation and arrangement, matrix porosity, decellularization efficiency, and residual vascular channels scoring 10.5±0.8, 12.8±1.0, and 9.7±0.7 out of a maximum total score of 16, respectively This analysis of commercially available dECM products in terms of their structure and cellularity includes 12 different commercial materials The findings highlight the variability of the products in terms of matrix structure and the efficacy of decellularization.
市售细胞外基质软组织生物支架的比较分析
脱细胞细胞外基质(dECM)产品已广泛用于软组织修复、重建和加固。这些再生生物材料在结构和生物特性方面模仿原生组织的 ECM,可从各种组织来源和物种中生产。最佳的源组织处理要求在去除细胞物质与保留组织 ECM 的结构和生物特性之间取得平衡。尽管 dECM 产品已广泛应用于临床,但仍缺乏有关这些产品的比较信息。 从结构上看,一些 dECM 产品显示出保存完好的胶原结构和广泛的孔隙分布,而另一些产品则显示出与原生组织相比明显改变的结构。不同产品的脱细胞效果各不相同。调查的一些材料(OFMm、PPN、PPC、OFMo、UBM、SISz、ADM、PADM 和 BADM)基本上没有核体(平均每 HPF 50 个细胞)。产品的病理学评估表明,OFMm、OFMo 和 PADM 在胶原纤维取向和排列、基质孔隙度、脱细胞效率和残留血管通道方面的定性评估得分最高,分别为 10.5±0.8、12.8±1.0 和 9.7±0.7(总分最高)。这项对市售 dECM 产品结构和细胞性的分析包括 12 种不同的商用材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering Part A
Tissue Engineering Part A CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信