Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rida Mitha,Mark A Mahan,Rujvee P Patel,Jhair Alejandro Colan,Jannik Leyendecker,Mark M Zaki,Edward Samir Harake,Varun Kathawate,Osama Kashlan,Sanjay Konakondla,Meng Huang,Galal A Elsayed,Daniel M Hafez,Brenton Pennicooke,Nitin Agarwal,Christoff P Hofstetter,John O Ogunlade
{"title":"Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"Rida Mitha,Mark A Mahan,Rujvee P Patel,Jhair Alejandro Colan,Jannik Leyendecker,Mark M Zaki,Edward Samir Harake,Varun Kathawate,Osama Kashlan,Sanjay Konakondla,Meng Huang,Galal A Elsayed,Daniel M Hafez,Brenton Pennicooke,Nitin Agarwal,Christoff P Hofstetter,John O Ogunlade","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nDegenerative spondylolisthesis is an important cause of chronic low-back and radiculopathy in the adult US population. Open decompression with or without fusion is considered the standard for management, yet optimal treatment remains controversial. Full endoscopic spine surgery offers an alternative surgical approach with possible advantages. There is a paucity of data on the use of FESS in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Therefore, we present the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 73 patients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis with severe stenosis, who underwent lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPatients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent a lumbar endoscopic ULBD at six spine centers in North America were included in this study. Patients were followed up at 3, 9, and 12 months. Static and dynamic imaging was performed and evaluated routinely before surgery to identify the pathology and grade of spondylolisthesis. Patient reported outcomes were prospectively collected.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThis study included 73 patients from six spine centers. Sixty-two patients were diagnosed with grade 1 spondylolisthesis while 11 were diagnosed with grade 2 spondylolisthesis. Postoperatively 70 patients reported improved symptoms and pain resolution while three patients reported worse pain. Mean VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI scores showed a statistically significant improvement at 3, 9, and 12-months when compared to the preoperative period. Radiographically, no patient in our study had progression of grade of spondylolisthesis.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPatients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis causing severe stenosis can safely be treated with lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression. Head-to-head trial should be undertaken to provide higher level of clinical evidence.","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Degenerative spondylolisthesis is an important cause of chronic low-back and radiculopathy in the adult US population. Open decompression with or without fusion is considered the standard for management, yet optimal treatment remains controversial. Full endoscopic spine surgery offers an alternative surgical approach with possible advantages. There is a paucity of data on the use of FESS in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Therefore, we present the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 73 patients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis with severe stenosis, who underwent lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression. METHODS Patients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent a lumbar endoscopic ULBD at six spine centers in North America were included in this study. Patients were followed up at 3, 9, and 12 months. Static and dynamic imaging was performed and evaluated routinely before surgery to identify the pathology and grade of spondylolisthesis. Patient reported outcomes were prospectively collected. RESULTS This study included 73 patients from six spine centers. Sixty-two patients were diagnosed with grade 1 spondylolisthesis while 11 were diagnosed with grade 2 spondylolisthesis. Postoperatively 70 patients reported improved symptoms and pain resolution while three patients reported worse pain. Mean VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI scores showed a statistically significant improvement at 3, 9, and 12-months when compared to the preoperative period. Radiographically, no patient in our study had progression of grade of spondylolisthesis. CONCLUSION Patients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis causing severe stenosis can safely be treated with lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression. Head-to-head trial should be undertaken to provide higher level of clinical evidence.
腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切除术用于退行性脊椎滑脱症的双侧减压。
简介:退行性脊椎滑脱症是导致美国成年人慢性腰背痛和根性神经病的一个重要原因。开放性减压加或不加融合术被认为是治疗的标准,但最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。全内窥镜脊柱手术提供了另一种可能具有优势的手术方法。在退行性脊柱滑脱症中使用全内窥镜脊柱手术的数据很少。因此,我们报告了 73 例严重狭窄的低度退行性椎体滑脱患者的临床和影像学结果,这些患者接受了腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切除术进行双侧减压。对患者进行了 3 个月、9 个月和 12 个月的随访。手术前常规进行静态和动态成像评估,以确定脊柱滑脱症的病理和等级。该研究纳入了来自六个脊柱中心的 73 名患者。62名患者被诊断为1级脊柱滑脱症,11名患者被诊断为2级脊柱滑脱症。术后 70 名患者的症状和疼痛得到改善,3 名患者的疼痛加剧。与术前相比,3 个月、9 个月和 12 个月的平均 VAS 背部评分、VAS 腿部评分和 ODI 评分均有显著改善。结论低度退行性脊椎滑脱导致严重狭窄的患者可以安全地接受腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切除术进行双侧减压。应进行头对头试验,以提供更高水平的临床证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信