Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prediction of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Pituitary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prediction of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Pituitary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo,Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani,Amir Koohfar,Ehsan Goudarzi,Mandana Dehghan,Seyed Hesam Hojjat,Rana Hashemi,Salem M Tos,Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand,Mohammad Amin Habibi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPostoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is the leading adverse event in transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Intraoperative CSF (ioCSF) leakage is one of the most important predictive factors for postoperative CSF leakage. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting ioCSF.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nLiterature records were retrieved on June 13th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOur results demonstrate that the AI models achieved a pooled sensitivity of 93.4% (95% CI: 74.8%- 98.6%) and specificity of 91.7% (95% CI: 75%- 97.6%). The subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivities in ML and DL were 86.2% (95% CI: 83%- 88.8%) and 99% (95% CI: 93%- 99%), respectively (P<0.01). The subgroup analysis demonstrated a pooled specificity of 92.1% (95% CI: 63.1%- 98.7%) for ML and 90.6% (95% CI: 78.2%- 96.3%) for DL models (P= 0.87). The DOR meta-analysis revealed an odds ratio (OR) 114.6 (95% CI: 17.6- 750.9). The SROC curve demonstrated that the overall AUC of the studies was 0.955, which is a considerable performance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAI models have demonstrated promising performance for predicting the ioCSF leakage in pituitary surgery and can optimize the treatment strategy.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is the leading adverse event in transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Intraoperative CSF (ioCSF) leakage is one of the most important predictive factors for postoperative CSF leakage. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting ioCSF.
METHODS
Literature records were retrieved on June 13th, 2024, using the relevant key terms without filters in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.
RESULTS
Our results demonstrate that the AI models achieved a pooled sensitivity of 93.4% (95% CI: 74.8%- 98.6%) and specificity of 91.7% (95% CI: 75%- 97.6%). The subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivities in ML and DL were 86.2% (95% CI: 83%- 88.8%) and 99% (95% CI: 93%- 99%), respectively (P<0.01). The subgroup analysis demonstrated a pooled specificity of 92.1% (95% CI: 63.1%- 98.7%) for ML and 90.6% (95% CI: 78.2%- 96.3%) for DL models (P= 0.87). The DOR meta-analysis revealed an odds ratio (OR) 114.6 (95% CI: 17.6- 750.9). The SROC curve demonstrated that the overall AUC of the studies was 0.955, which is a considerable performance.
CONCLUSION
AI models have demonstrated promising performance for predicting the ioCSF leakage in pituitary surgery and can optimize the treatment strategy.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.