PrEP Stigma as a Minority Stressor among Black Sexual Minority Men: A Mixed-Methods Study

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rodman Turpin, Aaron D. Camp, C. J. Mandell, Julia Mandeville, Rochelle R. Davidson Mhonde, Jamil Smith, Hongjie Liu, Typhanye Dyer, Kenneth H. Mayer, Bradley Boekeloo
{"title":"PrEP Stigma as a Minority Stressor among Black Sexual Minority Men: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Rodman Turpin, Aaron D. Camp, C. J. Mandell, Julia Mandeville, Rochelle R. Davidson Mhonde, Jamil Smith, Hongjie Liu, Typhanye Dyer, Kenneth H. Mayer, Bradley Boekeloo","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04481-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Black sexual minority men (BSMM) remain disproportionately affected by HIV, yet Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake in this population remains relatively low. Informed by minority stress theory, PrEP stigma may manifest in and exacerbate societal marginalization based on sexuality and race. We used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach to determine if PrEP-specific stigma was associated with reduced PrEP uptake among BSMM, and qualitatively explored how PrEP use is stigmatized among BSMM. We analyzed cross-sectional data from a pilot sample of BSMM (<i>n</i> = 151) collected in late 2020 in the United States, testing for associations between PrEP stigma and PrEP use using modified Poisson regression. Subsequently, we selected participants (<i>n</i> = 23) from this sample for qualitative interviews starting in 2022. Responses to questions related to PrEP stigma were analyzed using thematic analysis. PrEP stigma was associated less than half the PrEP use (aPR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.24, 0.75) among BSMM after adjustment. Qualitatively, we identified three major themes in how PrEP use is stigmatized among BSMM: PrEP-specific sexual stigma, intersections between PrEP and HIV stigma, and PrEP misinformation and disinformation. Aligned with minority stress theory, each theme was based in part in stigma related to sexuality or race. We found strong relationships between PrEP stigma and PrEP use independent of several sociobehavioral factors. Each of our themes were based in part in minority stressors, and underscore the importance of culturally competent PrEP promotion efforts towards BSMM. Addressing stigma is a core component of health equity efforts towards ending the HIV epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04481-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black sexual minority men (BSMM) remain disproportionately affected by HIV, yet Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake in this population remains relatively low. Informed by minority stress theory, PrEP stigma may manifest in and exacerbate societal marginalization based on sexuality and race. We used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach to determine if PrEP-specific stigma was associated with reduced PrEP uptake among BSMM, and qualitatively explored how PrEP use is stigmatized among BSMM. We analyzed cross-sectional data from a pilot sample of BSMM (n = 151) collected in late 2020 in the United States, testing for associations between PrEP stigma and PrEP use using modified Poisson regression. Subsequently, we selected participants (n = 23) from this sample for qualitative interviews starting in 2022. Responses to questions related to PrEP stigma were analyzed using thematic analysis. PrEP stigma was associated less than half the PrEP use (aPR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.24, 0.75) among BSMM after adjustment. Qualitatively, we identified three major themes in how PrEP use is stigmatized among BSMM: PrEP-specific sexual stigma, intersections between PrEP and HIV stigma, and PrEP misinformation and disinformation. Aligned with minority stress theory, each theme was based in part in stigma related to sexuality or race. We found strong relationships between PrEP stigma and PrEP use independent of several sociobehavioral factors. Each of our themes were based in part in minority stressors, and underscore the importance of culturally competent PrEP promotion efforts towards BSMM. Addressing stigma is a core component of health equity efforts towards ending the HIV epidemic.

PrEP 耻辱是黑人性少数群体男性中的少数群体压力:混合方法研究
黑人性少数群体男性(BSMM)受艾滋病毒影响的比例仍然过高,但这一人群对暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)的接受程度仍然相对较低。根据少数群体压力理论,PrEP 的污名化可能表现为并加剧基于性行为和种族的社会边缘化。我们采用了一种探索性的顺序混合方法来确定 PrEP 的特定污名是否与 BSMM 中 PrEP 使用率的降低有关,并从定性角度探讨了 PrEP 的使用在 BSMM 中是如何被污名化的。我们分析了 2020 年末在美国收集的 BSMM 试点样本(n = 151)的横截面数据,使用修正泊松回归法检验了 PrEP 耻辱感与 PrEP 使用之间的关联。随后,我们从该样本中挑选出参与者(n = 23),从 2022 年开始进行定性访谈。我们采用主题分析法对 PrEP 耻辱感相关问题的回答进行了分析。经调整后,PrEP 耻辱感与 BSMM 使用 PrEP 的相关性不到一半(aPR = 0.43,95% CI = 0.24,0.75)。从定性的角度来看,我们发现了在黑人和女性同性恋者中使用 PrEP 如何被污名化的三大主题:针对 PrEP 的性污名化、PrEP 与 HIV 污名化之间的交叉,以及 PrEP 的误导和虚假信息。根据少数群体压力理论,每个主题都部分基于与性或种族有关的污名化。我们发现,PrEP 耻辱感与 PrEP 的使用之间存在着密切的关系,且与若干社会行为因素无关。我们的每个主题都部分基于少数群体的压力因素,并强调了针对黑人、亚裔和少数族裔开展符合其文化背景的 PrEP 推广工作的重要性。解决污名化问题是为终结艾滋病疫情而开展的健康公平工作的核心组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信