Phylogenomic Analysis Supports the Reclassification of Caldicoprobacter faecalis (Winter et al. 1988) Bouanane-Darenfed et al. (2015) as a Later Heterotypic Synonym of Caldicoprobacter oshimai Yokoyama et al. (2010)
Khaoula Bouznada, Rafika Saker, Hadj Ahmed Belaouni, Atika Meklat
{"title":"Phylogenomic Analysis Supports the Reclassification of Caldicoprobacter faecalis (Winter et al. 1988) Bouanane-Darenfed et al. (2015) as a Later Heterotypic Synonym of Caldicoprobacter oshimai Yokoyama et al. (2010)","authors":"Khaoula Bouznada, Rafika Saker, Hadj Ahmed Belaouni, Atika Meklat","doi":"10.1007/s00284-024-03878-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study employs genome-based methodologies to explore the taxonomic relationship between <i>Caldicoprobacter faecalis</i> DSM 20678<sup>T</sup> and <i>Caldicoprobacter oshimai</i> DSM 21659<sup>T</sup>. The genome-based similarity indices calculations consisting of digital DNA–DNA Hybridization (dDDH), Average Amino Aid Identity (AAI), and Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) between the genomes of these two type strains yielded percentages of 91.2%, 98.9%, and 99.1%, respectively. These values were above the recommended thresholds of 70% (dDDH) and 95–96% (ANI and AAI) for bacterial species delineation, indicating a shared taxonomic position for <i>C. faecalis</i> and <i>C. oshimai</i>. Furthermore, analysis utilizing the 'Bacterial Pan Genome Analysis' (BPGA) pipeline and constructing a Maximum Likelihood core-genes tree using FastTree2 consistently demonstrated the close relationship between <i>C</i>. <i>faecalis</i> DSM 20678<sup>T</sup> and <i>C</i>. <i>oshimai</i> DSM 21659<sup>T</sup>, evident from their clustering in the core-genes phylogenomic tree. Based on these comprehensive findings, we propose the reclassification of <i>C</i>. <i>faecalis</i> as a later heterotypic synonym of <i>C</i>. <i>oshimai</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-03878-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study employs genome-based methodologies to explore the taxonomic relationship between Caldicoprobacter faecalis DSM 20678T and Caldicoprobacter oshimai DSM 21659T. The genome-based similarity indices calculations consisting of digital DNA–DNA Hybridization (dDDH), Average Amino Aid Identity (AAI), and Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) between the genomes of these two type strains yielded percentages of 91.2%, 98.9%, and 99.1%, respectively. These values were above the recommended thresholds of 70% (dDDH) and 95–96% (ANI and AAI) for bacterial species delineation, indicating a shared taxonomic position for C. faecalis and C. oshimai. Furthermore, analysis utilizing the 'Bacterial Pan Genome Analysis' (BPGA) pipeline and constructing a Maximum Likelihood core-genes tree using FastTree2 consistently demonstrated the close relationship between C. faecalis DSM 20678T and C. oshimai DSM 21659T, evident from their clustering in the core-genes phylogenomic tree. Based on these comprehensive findings, we propose the reclassification of C. faecalis as a later heterotypic synonym of C. oshimai.