The effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric tube-related pressure injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
{"title":"The effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric tube-related pressure injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Maide Yeşilyurt,Serpil Yüksel,Alper Yosunkaya","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThe aim of this study is to determine the effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric (NG) tube-related pressure injuries (PIs).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nThis study was a three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04682925).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe study was conducted with 102 patients who underwent NG tube insertion immediately after admission to the anesthesiology and reanimation intensive care unit of a university hospital in Turkey. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: a control arm (n = 34), a hydrocolloid dressing arm (n = 34), and a skin care arm (n = 34). Patients in the hydrocolloid dressing arm received daily application of hydrocolloid dressing to the nasal mucosa and alae nasi where the NG tube was inserted. Patients in the skin care arm received skin care interventions in preventing PIs twice daily. No interventions were administered to the control group.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNo NG tube-related PIs occurred in any patients in the hydrocolloid dressing arm. However, PIs occurred in 97.1 % of patients in the control arm and 94.1 % of patients in the skin care arm. According to the results of regression analysis, failure to apply hydrocolloid dressing increased the risk of NG tube-related PIs by 20.3 times [OR = 20.301, 95 % CI = 6.335-65.053, p < 0.001]. Additionally, a one-unit increase in the duration of ventilation days reduced the risk of NG tube-related PIs by 17.7 % (1-0.823) [OR = 0.823 (95 % CI = 0.684-0.989), p = 0.038].\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nResults revealed that hydrocolloid dressing is effective in preventing of NG tube-related PIs, whereas skin care did not demonstrate the same effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.09.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric (NG) tube-related pressure injuries (PIs).
DESIGN
This study was a three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04682925).
METHODS
The study was conducted with 102 patients who underwent NG tube insertion immediately after admission to the anesthesiology and reanimation intensive care unit of a university hospital in Turkey. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: a control arm (n = 34), a hydrocolloid dressing arm (n = 34), and a skin care arm (n = 34). Patients in the hydrocolloid dressing arm received daily application of hydrocolloid dressing to the nasal mucosa and alae nasi where the NG tube was inserted. Patients in the skin care arm received skin care interventions in preventing PIs twice daily. No interventions were administered to the control group.
RESULTS
No NG tube-related PIs occurred in any patients in the hydrocolloid dressing arm. However, PIs occurred in 97.1 % of patients in the control arm and 94.1 % of patients in the skin care arm. According to the results of regression analysis, failure to apply hydrocolloid dressing increased the risk of NG tube-related PIs by 20.3 times [OR = 20.301, 95 % CI = 6.335-65.053, p < 0.001]. Additionally, a one-unit increase in the duration of ventilation days reduced the risk of NG tube-related PIs by 17.7 % (1-0.823) [OR = 0.823 (95 % CI = 0.684-0.989), p = 0.038].
CONCLUSION
Results revealed that hydrocolloid dressing is effective in preventing of NG tube-related PIs, whereas skin care did not demonstrate the same effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management.
The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.