The Cannibal’s Antidote for Resentment: Diffracting Ressentiment through Decolonial Thought

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Pedro Brea
{"title":"The Cannibal’s Antidote for Resentment: Diffracting Ressentiment through Decolonial Thought","authors":"Pedro Brea","doi":"10.1163/15691640-12341553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay is split into two thought experiments. The first will be to diffract <i>ressentiment</i> through the works of Gloria Anzaldúa and Édouard Glissant. I will create a bridge with decolonial thought by interpreting Anzaldúa’s concept of the <i>nopal de castilla</i> and <i>mestiza</i> consciousness through the interpretive lens of <i>ressentiment</i> to show the affinity that exists between the work of Anzaldúa and Nietzsche. I then look at <i>ressentiment</i> through some of the concepts Glissant offers in the <i>Poetics of Relation</i>. I argue that <i>ressentiment</i> resists the creolization of identity and culture, and that Glissant’s demand for the right to opacity for all signals the overcoming of <i>ressentiment</i>. The second experiment diffracts <i>ressentiment</i> through Eduardo Viveiros de Castro’s <i>Cannibal Metaphysics</i>, beginning with an analysis of the most relevant points of that text for our discussion, then putting our diffracted <i>ressentiment</i> in conversation with the Brazilian anthropologist’s post-structural interpretation of Amerindian perspectivism.</p>","PeriodicalId":44158,"journal":{"name":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay is split into two thought experiments. The first will be to diffract ressentiment through the works of Gloria Anzaldúa and Édouard Glissant. I will create a bridge with decolonial thought by interpreting Anzaldúa’s concept of the nopal de castilla and mestiza consciousness through the interpretive lens of ressentiment to show the affinity that exists between the work of Anzaldúa and Nietzsche. I then look at ressentiment through some of the concepts Glissant offers in the Poetics of Relation. I argue that ressentiment resists the creolization of identity and culture, and that Glissant’s demand for the right to opacity for all signals the overcoming of ressentiment. The second experiment diffracts ressentiment through Eduardo Viveiros de Castro’s Cannibal Metaphysics, beginning with an analysis of the most relevant points of that text for our discussion, then putting our diffracted ressentiment in conversation with the Brazilian anthropologist’s post-structural interpretation of Amerindian perspectivism.

食人族的怨恨解药:通过非殖民化思想分散怨恨情绪
本文分为两个思想实验。首先是通过格洛丽亚-安萨尔杜亚和爱德华-格里桑的作品来衍射 "情绪"。我将架起一座与非殖民化思想沟通的桥梁,通过 "残余感 "的解释视角来解读安萨尔杜亚的 "nopal de castilla "概念和 "混血儿意识",从而展示安萨尔杜亚的作品与尼采之间存在的亲和力。然后,我通过格利桑在《关系诗学》中提出的一些概念来审视再感性。我认为,怨恨抵制身份和文化的克里奥尔化,而格利桑对所有人享有不透明权利的要求标志着对怨恨的克服。第二项实验通过爱德华多-维维罗斯-德-卡斯特罗(Eduardo Viveiros de Castro)的《食人形而上学》(Cannibal Metaphysics)对移情进行衍射,首先分析该文本中与我们的讨论最相关的观点,然后将我们衍射的移情与这位巴西人类学家对美洲印第安人视角主义的后结构阐释进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Research in Phenomenology deals with phenomenological philosophy in a broad sense, including original phenomenological research, critical and interpretative studies of major phenomenological thinkers, studies relating phenomenological philosophy to other disciplines, and historical studies of special relevance to phenomenological philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信