Quality of birth care and risk factors of length of stay after birth: A machine learning approach

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Songul Cinaroglu, Busra Saylan
{"title":"Quality of birth care and risk factors of length of stay after birth: A machine learning approach","authors":"Songul Cinaroglu,&nbsp;Busra Saylan","doi":"10.1111/jog.16072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Length of stay (LOS) is an outcome measure and is assumed to be related to quality. The objective of this study is to examine the quality of birth care and risk factors associated with LOS after birth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationwide population-based Turkish Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) was used for the year 2018. A total of 1849 women ages 15–49 were included. Explanatory factor analysis and machine learning predictors such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Naïve Bayes were used to identify the quality of birth care and risk factors associated with LOS after birth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, factor structures of quality of birth care, antenatal check-ups and supplements, and risk factors associated with birth were obtained using the Categorical Component Analysis method. The type of delivery, place of delivery, age, and type of place, which are under the quality of birth care, and risk factors associated with birth factors were found to be the variables that had the highest impact on LOS estimation. Random forest (Accuracy = 0.5789), support vector machine (radial) (Accuracy = 0.5766), and neural network (Accuracy = 0.5750) models outperformed, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Type of delivery which is an indicator of quality of birth care is a strong predictor of LOS after birth according to the Random Forest model. We demonstrated that machine learning techniques offer precise LOS prediction after birth. Further studies assessing the effect of quality of birth care on predicting LOS at birth would be beneficial.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"50 10","pages":"1848-1856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Length of stay (LOS) is an outcome measure and is assumed to be related to quality. The objective of this study is to examine the quality of birth care and risk factors associated with LOS after birth.

Methods

A nationwide population-based Turkish Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) was used for the year 2018. A total of 1849 women ages 15–49 were included. Explanatory factor analysis and machine learning predictors such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Naïve Bayes were used to identify the quality of birth care and risk factors associated with LOS after birth.

Results

As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, factor structures of quality of birth care, antenatal check-ups and supplements, and risk factors associated with birth were obtained using the Categorical Component Analysis method. The type of delivery, place of delivery, age, and type of place, which are under the quality of birth care, and risk factors associated with birth factors were found to be the variables that had the highest impact on LOS estimation. Random forest (Accuracy = 0.5789), support vector machine (radial) (Accuracy = 0.5766), and neural network (Accuracy = 0.5750) models outperformed, respectively.

Conclusion

Type of delivery which is an indicator of quality of birth care is a strong predictor of LOS after birth according to the Random Forest model. We demonstrated that machine learning techniques offer precise LOS prediction after birth. Further studies assessing the effect of quality of birth care on predicting LOS at birth would be beneficial.

分娩护理质量和产后住院时间的风险因素:机器学习方法
目的 分娩住院时间(LOS)是一项结果测量指标,被认为与质量有关。本研究旨在考察分娩护理的质量以及与产后住院时间相关的风险因素。方法采用了 2018 年基于全国人口的土耳其人口与健康调查(TDHS)。共纳入了 1849 名 15-49 岁的女性。采用解释性因子分析和随机森林、支持向量机、神经网络、k-近邻和奈伊贝叶斯等机器学习预测方法来识别分娩护理质量和与产后 LOS 相关的风险因素。结果通过解释性因子分析,采用分类成分分析法得到了分娩护理质量、产前检查和补充剂以及与分娩相关的风险因素的因子结构。结果发现,分娩类型、分娩地点、年龄和地点类型(属于分娩护理质量和与分娩相关的风险因素)是对 LOS 估计影响最大的变量。随机森林(准确率 = 0.5789)、支持向量机(径向)(准确率 = 0.5766)和神经网络(准确率 = 0.5750)模型的表现分别优于随机森林模型。我们证明了机器学习技术能准确预测产后 LOS。进一步研究评估分娩护理质量对预测产后 LOS 的影响将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信