Direct tensile tests on steel fiber reinforced concrete with focus on wall effect and fiber orientation

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Sören Faustmann, Maximilian Kronau, Oliver Fischer
{"title":"Direct tensile tests on steel fiber reinforced concrete with focus on wall effect and fiber orientation","authors":"Sören Faustmann,&nbsp;Maximilian Kronau,&nbsp;Oliver Fischer","doi":"10.1617/s11527-024-02463-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adding steel fibers to concrete essentially improves its post-crack tensile properties. To determine this experimentally, indirect methods, such as flexural tensile tests, are generally used, which allow only indirect conclusions about the material´s tensile properties. In contrast, direct tensile tests provide the desired result immediately, but are difficult to realize. A key parameter affecting the performance of the SRFC is the orientation of the fibers, which is mainly influenced by the manufacturing process. Typically, when the concrete is cast, the steel fibers align with the edges of the formwork. This is commonly called the wall effect. We address these issues, presenting the setup and results of direct tensile tests on bone shaped specimens with three different steel fiber contents. For each content, a series of specimens with a three-sided formwork (i.e. three-sided wall effect and strong influence on the fiber orientation) and a series with cut-out bones (i.e. one-sided wall effect and less influence on fiber orientation) were fabricated and tested. After these tests, the fiber orientation was determined using an opto-analytical method to quantify the influence of the manufacturing methods on the fiber orientation. Comparing the stress-crack-opening relationships shows that the cut specimens at 0.5 mm crack openings have only about 80% of the tensile strength of three-sided formwork specimens. This effect decreases with larger crack openings and vanishes at about 3 mm crack opening. Finally, a new fiber reinforcement index is defined to correlate observed stress in direct tensile tests to fiber content and orientation in direct tensile tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"57 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-024-02463-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02463-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adding steel fibers to concrete essentially improves its post-crack tensile properties. To determine this experimentally, indirect methods, such as flexural tensile tests, are generally used, which allow only indirect conclusions about the material´s tensile properties. In contrast, direct tensile tests provide the desired result immediately, but are difficult to realize. A key parameter affecting the performance of the SRFC is the orientation of the fibers, which is mainly influenced by the manufacturing process. Typically, when the concrete is cast, the steel fibers align with the edges of the formwork. This is commonly called the wall effect. We address these issues, presenting the setup and results of direct tensile tests on bone shaped specimens with three different steel fiber contents. For each content, a series of specimens with a three-sided formwork (i.e. three-sided wall effect and strong influence on the fiber orientation) and a series with cut-out bones (i.e. one-sided wall effect and less influence on fiber orientation) were fabricated and tested. After these tests, the fiber orientation was determined using an opto-analytical method to quantify the influence of the manufacturing methods on the fiber orientation. Comparing the stress-crack-opening relationships shows that the cut specimens at 0.5 mm crack openings have only about 80% of the tensile strength of three-sided formwork specimens. This effect decreases with larger crack openings and vanishes at about 3 mm crack opening. Finally, a new fiber reinforcement index is defined to correlate observed stress in direct tensile tests to fiber content and orientation in direct tensile tests.

Abstract Image

钢纤维加固混凝土的直接拉伸试验,重点关注壁效应和纤维取向
在混凝土中加入钢纤维可从根本上改善其开裂后的拉伸性能。要在实验中确定这一点,通常采用间接方法,如弯曲拉伸试验,但这种方法只能对材料的拉伸性能得出间接结论。与此相反,直接拉伸试验可以立即得到所需的结果,但却难以实现。影响 SRFC 性能的一个关键参数是纤维的取向,这主要受制造工艺的影响。通常情况下,在浇注混凝土时,钢纤维会与模板边缘对齐。这通常被称为墙效应。我们针对这些问题,介绍了对三种不同钢纤维含量的骨形试样进行直接拉伸试验的设置和结果。针对每种纤维含量,我们制作并测试了一系列具有三面模板的试样(即三面墙效应,对纤维取向影响较大)和一系列具有切割骨的试样(即单面墙效应,对纤维取向影响较小)。测试结束后,使用光学分析方法确定纤维取向,以量化制造方法对纤维取向的影响。比较应力-裂缝-开口关系发现,0.5 毫米裂缝开口的切割试样的抗拉强度仅为三面模板试样的 80%左右。这种影响随着裂缝开口的增大而减小,在裂缝开口约为 3 毫米时消失。最后,定义了一种新的纤维加固指数,用于将直接拉伸试验中观察到的应力与直接拉伸试验中的纤维含量和取向相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信