Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for Analgesia During Heel Prick in Newborn Infants – A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Rajendra Prasad Anne, Nalina Amuji, Jayaraman Thinesh, Vardhelli Venkateshwarlu, Vadije Praveen Rao, Nasreen Banu Shaik, Abdul Kareem Pullattayil, Bharathi Balachander, Sindhu Sivanandhan, Jogender Kumar, Neeraj Gupta, Deepak Chawla, Praveen Kumar, Suman Rao
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for Analgesia During Heel Prick in Newborn Infants – A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Rajendra Prasad Anne, Nalina Amuji, Jayaraman Thinesh, Vardhelli Venkateshwarlu, Vadije Praveen Rao, Nasreen Banu Shaik, Abdul Kareem Pullattayil, Bharathi Balachander, Sindhu Sivanandhan, Jogender Kumar, Neeraj Gupta, Deepak Chawla, Praveen Kumar, Suman Rao","doi":"10.1007/s13312-024-3279-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>Heel prick is one among the common painful procedures in neonates. We performed a systematic review and network metaanalysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of different interventions for analgesia during heel prick in neonates.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Evidence acquisition</h3><p>Medline, Cochrane, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until February 2023. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials that evaluated different pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for analgesia during heel prick for neonates were included. Data from the included trials were extracted in duplicate. A NMA with a frequentist random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. We adhered to the PRISMA-NMA guidelines.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>One-hundred-and-three trials comparing 51 different analgesic measures were included. Among the 38 interventions, for pain “during” heel prick, non-nutritive suckling (NNS) plus sucrose [SMD Ȓ3.15 (Ȓ2.62, Ȓ3.69)], followed by breastfeeding, glucose, expressed breast milk (EBM), sucrose, NNS and touch massage, had a high certainty of evidence (CoE) to reduce pain scores when compared to no intervention. Among the 23 interventions for pain at 30 seconds after heel-prick, moderate CoE was noted for facilitated tucking plus NNS plus music, glucose, NNS plus sucrose, sucrose plus swaddling, mother holding, EBM, sucrose and NNS.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Oral sucrose 2 minutes before combined with NNS during the procedure, was the best intervention for reducing pain during heel prick. It also effectively reduced pain scores 30 seconds and 1 minute after the procedure. Other interventions with moderate to high CoE for a significant reduction in pain during and at 30 seconds after heel prick are oral sucrose, oral glucose, EBM and NNS. All these are low-cost and feasible interventions for most of the settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-024-3279-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Heel prick is one among the common painful procedures in neonates. We performed a systematic review and network metaanalysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of different interventions for analgesia during heel prick in neonates.

Evidence acquisition

Medline, Cochrane, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until February 2023. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials that evaluated different pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for analgesia during heel prick for neonates were included. Data from the included trials were extracted in duplicate. A NMA with a frequentist random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. We adhered to the PRISMA-NMA guidelines.

Results

One-hundred-and-three trials comparing 51 different analgesic measures were included. Among the 38 interventions, for pain “during” heel prick, non-nutritive suckling (NNS) plus sucrose [SMD Ȓ3.15 (Ȓ2.62, Ȓ3.69)], followed by breastfeeding, glucose, expressed breast milk (EBM), sucrose, NNS and touch massage, had a high certainty of evidence (CoE) to reduce pain scores when compared to no intervention. Among the 23 interventions for pain at 30 seconds after heel-prick, moderate CoE was noted for facilitated tucking plus NNS plus music, glucose, NNS plus sucrose, sucrose plus swaddling, mother holding, EBM, sucrose and NNS.

Conclusions

Oral sucrose 2 minutes before combined with NNS during the procedure, was the best intervention for reducing pain during heel prick. It also effectively reduced pain scores 30 seconds and 1 minute after the procedure. Other interventions with moderate to high CoE for a significant reduction in pain during and at 30 seconds after heel prick are oral sucrose, oral glucose, EBM and NNS. All these are low-cost and feasible interventions for most of the settings.

新生儿足跟刺穿时镇痛干预措施的疗效比较 - 系统综述和网络 Meta 分析
背景刺足跟是新生儿常见的疼痛治疗方法之一。我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以比较新生儿足跟刺伤时不同镇痛干预措施的疗效。证据采集检索了Medline、Cochrane、Embase和CINAHL数据库,检索时间从开始到2023年2月。纳入的随机和准随机试验评估了新生儿足跟刺穿时不同的药物和非药物镇痛干预措施。从纳入的试验中提取的数据一式两份。数据综合采用了频数随机效应模型(NMA)。证据的确定性(CoE)采用 GRADE 进行评估。我们遵循了 PRISMA-NMA 指南。结果 纳入了 113 项比较 51 种不同镇痛措施的试验。在38项干预措施中,对于 "足跟刺痛",非营养性吸吮(NNS)加蔗糖[SMDȒ3.15 (Ȓ2.62, Ȓ3.69)],其次是母乳喂养、葡萄糖、母乳喂养(EBM)、蔗糖、NNS和抚触按摩,与无干预措施相比,这些措施在降低疼痛评分方面具有较高的证据确定性(CoE)。在针对刺扎足跟后 30 秒钟疼痛的 23 种干预措施中,促进性盖被加 NNS 加音乐、葡萄糖、NNS 加蔗糖、蔗糖加襁褓、母亲抱、EBM、蔗糖和 NNS 的 CoE 值为中等。它还能有效降低手术后 30 秒和 1 分钟的疼痛评分。其他能显著减少足跟刺中和刺后 30 秒疼痛的中高 CoE 干预措施包括口服蔗糖、口服葡萄糖、EBM 和 NNS。所有这些干预措施成本低,在大多数情况下都是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian pediatrics
Indian pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
344
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are: -To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health. -To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research. -To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics. -To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信