Comparison of two surgical approaches in treating children with thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis: a multicenter study

Abstract

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis to compare the clinical outcomes and complications associated with the posterior-anterior and posterior-only approaches in treating Thoracolumbar Junction (TLJ) Tuberculosis (TB) in children aged 3–10 years. Herein, 52 TLJ TB patients (age range = 3–10 years; mean age = 6.8 ± 2.2 years; females = 22; males = 30) treated with debridement, fusion, and instrumentation were recruited from two hospitals in China between May 2008 and February 2022, and their clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 24 group A patients and 28 group B patients underwent the posterior-anterior and posterior-only approaches, respectively. The two groups were assessed for surgical time, blood loss, hospitalization duration, operative complications, inflammatory indicators, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, kyphosis angles, and neurologic functions. Results or differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The average follow-up period was 37.5 ± 23.3 months. Compared to group A patients, group B patients exhibited significantly lower surgical time, blood loss amount, time it took to stand, and hospitalization duration, as well as fewer complications. Notably, the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) values of patients in both groups returned to normal one year post-surgery. Furthermore, compared to the preoperative values, patients’ VAS and ODI scores, as well as neurological functions and kyphosis angles, were significantly improved postoperatively and at the final follow-up, but with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Moreover, there was no internal fixation failure or TB recurrence, and all patients exhibited solid bone fusion at the last follow-up. For pediatric TLJ TB involving no or at most two segments, both posterior-anterior and posterior-only approaches could effectively remove lesions and decompress the spinal cord, restore spinal stability, correct kyphosis, and prevent deformity deterioration. Nonetheless, the posterior-only approach can more effectively shorten the surgical time, reduce related trauma and complications, and promote rapid recovery, making it a safer and highly preferable minimally invasive approach.