Associations of Racial Equity Training, Policies, and Practices With Routine Supervision Strategies in Community Corrections

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Craig S. J. Schwalbe, Kevonyah Edwards, Charles H. Lea, Deborah Koetzle
{"title":"Associations of Racial Equity Training, Policies, and Practices With Routine Supervision Strategies in Community Corrections","authors":"Craig S. J. Schwalbe, Kevonyah Edwards, Charles H. Lea, Deborah Koetzle","doi":"10.1177/00938548241276517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community corrections agencies across the United States are adopting racial equity as a priority in their polices, practices, and staff training, though how racial equity can be translated into the routine practices of probation and parole officers has not been widely discussed. This study examines the associations of perceived racial equity priorities on the supervision strategies reported by probation and parole officers in an online survey ( N = 1054). Approximately one-third of officers reported that their agencies prioritized racial equity. Racial equity scores were stronger in juvenile agencies and in agencies that prioritized evidence-informed practices. Racial equity was associated with reduced accountability-oriented case management practices. Results of this study suggest that racial equity policies and practices may impact client outcomes through changes in general supervision strategies. More research is needed to identify race-conscious strategies that community corrections officers can employ to meet the needs of people involved in the legal system.","PeriodicalId":48287,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241276517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community corrections agencies across the United States are adopting racial equity as a priority in their polices, practices, and staff training, though how racial equity can be translated into the routine practices of probation and parole officers has not been widely discussed. This study examines the associations of perceived racial equity priorities on the supervision strategies reported by probation and parole officers in an online survey ( N = 1054). Approximately one-third of officers reported that their agencies prioritized racial equity. Racial equity scores were stronger in juvenile agencies and in agencies that prioritized evidence-informed practices. Racial equity was associated with reduced accountability-oriented case management practices. Results of this study suggest that racial equity policies and practices may impact client outcomes through changes in general supervision strategies. More research is needed to identify race-conscious strategies that community corrections officers can employ to meet the needs of people involved in the legal system.
种族平等培训、政策和实践与社区矫正中的常规监管策略的关联
美国各地的社区管教机构都将种族公平作为其政策、实践和员工培训的优先事项,但如何将种族公平转化为缓刑和假释官员的日常实践还没有得到广泛讨论。本研究考察了缓刑和假释官员在网上调查(N = 1054)中报告的种族公平优先事项与监管策略之间的关联。约有三分之一的官员表示,他们的机构将种族公平放在首位。在青少年机构和优先考虑循证实践的机构中,种族公平得分更高。种族公平与以问责为导向的案件管理实践减少有关。这项研究的结果表明,种族公平政策和实践可能会通过改变一般监督策略来影响服务对象的结果。需要进行更多的研究,以确定社区管教人员可以采用的具有种族意识的策略,从而满足法律系统所涉人员的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice and Behavior publishes articles examining psychological and behavioral aspects of the juvenile and criminal justice systems. The concepts "criminal justice" and "behavior" should be interpreted broadly to include analyses of etiology of delinquent or criminal behavior, the process of law violation, victimology, offender classification and treatment, deterrence, and incapacitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信