Is a cork a legal shortcut? - A comparison of the measured and assumed amount of rotation in freestyle tricks.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Christian Merz,Falk Naundorf,Axel Schüler,Steven Pickardt,Tom Gorges,Matej Supej,Uwe G Kersting
{"title":"Is a cork a legal shortcut? - A comparison of the measured and assumed amount of rotation in freestyle tricks.","authors":"Christian Merz,Falk Naundorf,Axel Schüler,Steven Pickardt,Tom Gorges,Matej Supej,Uwe G Kersting","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2024.2399255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In snowboard freestyle disciplines, the amount of rotation is commonly determined as the sum of rotations around all board axes and is the most important indicator of the trick difficulty across all snowboard freestyle disciplines. Based on the type of rotation, tricks can be classified as flatspins, corks and flips. It is not yet known whether the type of rotation of a trick can influence the actual amount of rotation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the amount of deviation, defined as difference between measured and assumed amount of rotation as a function of trick classification, using kinematic motion analysis. The amount of deviation was positive for flatspins (median: 21°; min: -4°; max: 49°) and negative for corks (median: -25°; min: -89°; max: 12°) and flips (median: -28°; min: -94°; max: 13°). Our results demonstrate that there are ways of execution where riders perform corks and flips with a shortcut and flatspins with a detour. This should be taken into account by judges, coaches and riders. Further research is needed to investigate how the shortcut can be influenced.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2024.2399255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In snowboard freestyle disciplines, the amount of rotation is commonly determined as the sum of rotations around all board axes and is the most important indicator of the trick difficulty across all snowboard freestyle disciplines. Based on the type of rotation, tricks can be classified as flatspins, corks and flips. It is not yet known whether the type of rotation of a trick can influence the actual amount of rotation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the amount of deviation, defined as difference between measured and assumed amount of rotation as a function of trick classification, using kinematic motion analysis. The amount of deviation was positive for flatspins (median: 21°; min: -4°; max: 49°) and negative for corks (median: -25°; min: -89°; max: 12°) and flips (median: -28°; min: -94°; max: 13°). Our results demonstrate that there are ways of execution where riders perform corks and flips with a shortcut and flatspins with a detour. This should be taken into account by judges, coaches and riders. Further research is needed to investigate how the shortcut can be influenced.
软木塞是合法的捷径吗?- 自由式技巧中测量到的旋转量与假定旋转量的比较。
在单板自由式滑雪项目中,旋转量通常是指围绕所有板轴的旋转总和,也是衡量所有单板自由式滑雪项目中技巧难度的最重要指标。根据旋转的类型,技巧可分为平旋、开伞和空翻。目前还不清楚技巧的旋转类型是否会影响实际的旋转量。因此,本研究的目的是利用运动学分析来确定偏差量,即作为花式分类函数的测量旋转量与假定旋转量之间的差异。平旋的偏差量为正值(中位数:21°;最小值:-4°;最大值:49°),而瓶塞(中位数:-25°;最小值:-89°;最大值:12°)和空翻(中位数:-28°;最小值:-94°;最大值:13°)的偏差量为负值。我们的结果表明,车手在执行开叉和空翻动作时会走捷径,而在执行平抛动作时会绕道。裁判、教练和骑手都应考虑到这一点。需要进一步研究如何影响捷径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信