Optimisation of the diagnosis of Central Nervous System infections in Vietnamese hospitals: Results from a retrospective multicentre study

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Do Van Dong, Sébastien Boutin, Vu Viet Sang, Nguyen Dang Manh, Nghiem Xuan Hoan, Hoang Xuan Quang, Tran Thi Lien, Van Dinh Trang, Nguyen Trong The, Le Thi Kieu Linh, Kristina Schmauder, Viola Ueltzhöffer, Nourhane Hafza, Susanne Hauswaldt, Jan Rupp, Peter G Kremsner, Le Huu Song, Dennis Nurjadi, Silke Peter, Thirumalaisamy P Velavan
{"title":"Optimisation of the diagnosis of Central Nervous System infections in Vietnamese hospitals: Results from a retrospective multicentre study","authors":"Do Van Dong, Sébastien Boutin, Vu Viet Sang, Nguyen Dang Manh, Nghiem Xuan Hoan, Hoang Xuan Quang, Tran Thi Lien, Van Dinh Trang, Nguyen Trong The, Le Thi Kieu Linh, Kristina Schmauder, Viola Ueltzhöffer, Nourhane Hafza, Susanne Hauswaldt, Jan Rupp, Peter G Kremsner, Le Huu Song, Dennis Nurjadi, Silke Peter, Thirumalaisamy P Velavan","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Central nervous system (CNS) infections pose significant health challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment to prevent adverse outcomes. Traditional culture-based diagnostics are often slow and lack specificity. This study evaluates the BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (FAME) Panel against standard diagnostics in Vietnam to assess its clinical impact and suitability for local epidemiology. Methods We conducted a prospective study involving 330 patients with suspected CNS infections at four hospitals in northern Vietnam from July 2022 to April 2023. CSF samples were analysed using routine culture methods and FAME. We compared pathogen detection rates and assessed the potential clinical impact of FAME results on patient management. Results Of the 330 CSF specimens, 64 (19%) were positive by either conventional diagnostics (n=48) and/or FAME (n=33). The agreement between FAME and conventional diagnostics was 87%. Key pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n=7), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=5), Streptococcus suis (n=5), Epstein-Barr virus (n=3), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=1), and Trichosporon asahii (n=1) were not detected by FAME. Classical meningitis parameters-clinical symptoms, altered glucose, protein, and pleocytosis- were good predictors of FAME positivity, indicating their utility in optimizing local diagnostic algorithms. Conclusion FAME complements traditional diagnostics by offering rapid and broad pathogen detection, crucial for timely and appropriate therapy. However, its effectiveness varies with local epidemiology, and it should not replace conventional methods entirely. Tailoring diagnostic panels to regional pathogen prevalence is recommended to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Central nervous system (CNS) infections pose significant health challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment to prevent adverse outcomes. Traditional culture-based diagnostics are often slow and lack specificity. This study evaluates the BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (FAME) Panel against standard diagnostics in Vietnam to assess its clinical impact and suitability for local epidemiology. Methods We conducted a prospective study involving 330 patients with suspected CNS infections at four hospitals in northern Vietnam from July 2022 to April 2023. CSF samples were analysed using routine culture methods and FAME. We compared pathogen detection rates and assessed the potential clinical impact of FAME results on patient management. Results Of the 330 CSF specimens, 64 (19%) were positive by either conventional diagnostics (n=48) and/or FAME (n=33). The agreement between FAME and conventional diagnostics was 87%. Key pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n=7), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=5), Streptococcus suis (n=5), Epstein-Barr virus (n=3), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=1), and Trichosporon asahii (n=1) were not detected by FAME. Classical meningitis parameters-clinical symptoms, altered glucose, protein, and pleocytosis- were good predictors of FAME positivity, indicating their utility in optimizing local diagnostic algorithms. Conclusion FAME complements traditional diagnostics by offering rapid and broad pathogen detection, crucial for timely and appropriate therapy. However, its effectiveness varies with local epidemiology, and it should not replace conventional methods entirely. Tailoring diagnostic panels to regional pathogen prevalence is recommended to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes in LMICs.
越南医院中枢神经系统感染诊断的优化:一项回顾性多中心研究的结果
导言 中枢神经系统(CNS)感染因其发病率和死亡率高而对健康构成重大挑战,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。快速准确的诊断对于有效治疗以避免不良后果至关重要。传统的基于培养基的诊断通常速度较慢且缺乏特异性。本研究评估了 BioFire® FilmArray® 脑膜炎/脑炎(FAME)检测板与越南标准诊断方法的比较,以评估其临床影响和对当地流行病学的适用性。方法 我们开展了一项前瞻性研究,从 2022 年 7 月到 2023 年 4 月,越南北部四家医院共收治了 330 名疑似中枢神经系统感染患者。采用常规培养方法和 FAME 分析 CSF 样本。我们比较了病原体检出率,并评估了 FAME 结果对患者管理的潜在临床影响。结果 在 330 份 CSF 标本中,64 份(19%)在常规诊断(48 份)和/或 FAME(33 份)中呈阳性。FAME 与常规诊断的一致性为 87%。主要病原体结核分枝杆菌(7 例)、肺炎克雷伯菌(5 例)、猪链球菌(5 例)、Epstein-Barr 病毒(3 例)、鲍曼不动杆菌(1 例)和旭三代单胞菌(1 例)均未被 FAME 检测到。经典的脑膜炎参数--临床症状、葡萄糖、蛋白质和多形性细胞的改变--是预测 FAME 阳性的良好指标,表明它们在优化本地诊断算法中的作用。结论 FAME 是对传统诊断方法的补充,能快速、广泛地检测病原体,对及时、适当的治疗至关重要。然而,它的效果因当地流行病学而异,不应完全取代传统方法。建议根据地区病原体流行情况定制诊断面板,以提高诊断准确性,改善低收入和中等收入国家的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信