Assessment of Management Practices for Improving Productivity, Profitability, and Energy-Carbon-Water Use Efficiency of Intensive Rice-toria-Sweet Corn System in Eastern India

IF 3.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Stuti Debapriya Behera, Lalita Mohan Garnayak, Biswaranjan Behera, Basudev Behera, Sukanta Kumar Sarangi, Jagadish Jena, Swosti D. Behera, Sanat K. Dwibedi
{"title":"Assessment of Management Practices for Improving Productivity, Profitability, and Energy-Carbon-Water Use Efficiency of Intensive Rice-toria-Sweet Corn System in Eastern India","authors":"Stuti Debapriya Behera, Lalita Mohan Garnayak, Biswaranjan Behera, Basudev Behera, Sukanta Kumar Sarangi, Jagadish Jena, Swosti D. Behera, Sanat K. Dwibedi","doi":"10.1007/s42729-024-01993-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the primary factors contributing to the low productivity of the rice-based cropping systems in Eastern India is the imbalanced use of fertilizers and the improper timing of post-rice crops within the cropping window. Smart practices that boost system productivity and profitability and reduce energy-carbon-water footprints are crucial in changing climate. Therefore, the present study was carried out to identify the most energy-carbon-water efficient production practices having higher productivity and profitability for a rice-based cropping system in Eastern India. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four replications. In the main plots, six treatments comprising different nitrogen (N) management options (100% soil test-based N, 75% soil test-based N + green manuring and 50% soil test-based N + green manuring) and two rice cultivars (<i>manaswini</i> and <i>hasanta</i>) were allocated. The sub-plots consisted of three different crop establishment strategies (zero tillage, conventional tillage and furrow-irrigated raised bed) for the post-rice crops. The 75% soil test-based N with green manuring, among the N management options, provided the highest system yield and profitability, registering 12.9 and 24.1% increases over 100% soil test-based N, respectively. Among crop establishment methods, zero tillage (ZT) and furrow-irrigated raised bed (FIRB) gave similar system yields and net returns. In comparison to conventional tillage (CT), ZT produced 10.7 and 24.9% greater system productivity and profitability, respectively, while FIRB produced 13.2 and 24.8% higher yields and net returns. Both ZT and FIRB had higher energy use efficiency (18.1 and 19.5%, respectively) and carbon efficiency (9.7 and 9.1%, respectively) than the CT. The FIRB led to a 5.7% saving in system water requirements and 20.2% higher system water productivity as compared to the CT. The study concluded that 75% soil test-based N with green manuring and ZT or FIRB in post-rice crops could be the best suitable practices for the rice-<i>toria</i>-sweet corn system for higher system yield and net returns with low energy-carbon-water footprints under changing climate in the long run.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":17042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":"48 17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01993-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the primary factors contributing to the low productivity of the rice-based cropping systems in Eastern India is the imbalanced use of fertilizers and the improper timing of post-rice crops within the cropping window. Smart practices that boost system productivity and profitability and reduce energy-carbon-water footprints are crucial in changing climate. Therefore, the present study was carried out to identify the most energy-carbon-water efficient production practices having higher productivity and profitability for a rice-based cropping system in Eastern India. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four replications. In the main plots, six treatments comprising different nitrogen (N) management options (100% soil test-based N, 75% soil test-based N + green manuring and 50% soil test-based N + green manuring) and two rice cultivars (manaswini and hasanta) were allocated. The sub-plots consisted of three different crop establishment strategies (zero tillage, conventional tillage and furrow-irrigated raised bed) for the post-rice crops. The 75% soil test-based N with green manuring, among the N management options, provided the highest system yield and profitability, registering 12.9 and 24.1% increases over 100% soil test-based N, respectively. Among crop establishment methods, zero tillage (ZT) and furrow-irrigated raised bed (FIRB) gave similar system yields and net returns. In comparison to conventional tillage (CT), ZT produced 10.7 and 24.9% greater system productivity and profitability, respectively, while FIRB produced 13.2 and 24.8% higher yields and net returns. Both ZT and FIRB had higher energy use efficiency (18.1 and 19.5%, respectively) and carbon efficiency (9.7 and 9.1%, respectively) than the CT. The FIRB led to a 5.7% saving in system water requirements and 20.2% higher system water productivity as compared to the CT. The study concluded that 75% soil test-based N with green manuring and ZT or FIRB in post-rice crops could be the best suitable practices for the rice-toria-sweet corn system for higher system yield and net returns with low energy-carbon-water footprints under changing climate in the long run.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

对印度东部提高集约化水稻-托里亚-甜玉米系统的生产率、盈利能力和能源-碳-水利用效率的管理方法进行评估
造成印度东部以水稻为基础的种植系统生产率低下的主要因素之一是肥料使用不平衡以及种植窗口期内水稻后茬作物的时间安排不当。在气候不断变化的情况下,提高系统生产率和盈利能力并减少能源-碳-水足迹的明智做法至关重要。因此,本研究旨在为印度东部以水稻为基础的种植系统确定能效最高、碳水效益最高、生产率和收益率更高的生产方式。实验采用四次重复的分小区设计。在主小区中,分配了六个处理,包括不同的氮肥管理方案(100% 土壤测试氮肥、75% 土壤测试氮肥 + 绿肥和 50% 土壤测试氮肥 + 绿肥)和两个水稻栽培品种(manaswini 和 hasanta)。子地块包括三种不同的稻后作物种植策略(零耕作、传统耕作和沟渠灌溉高床)。在各种氮肥管理方案中,以 75% 的土壤测试氮肥和绿肥为基础的氮肥管理方案的系统产量和收益率最高,分别比以 100% 的土壤测试氮肥管理方案提高了 12.9% 和 24.1%。在作物种植方法中,零耕作(ZT)和沟灌高床(FIRB)的系统产量和净收益相似。与传统耕作(CT)相比,零耕法的系统产量和收益率分别提高了 10.7% 和 24.9%,而沟灌高床法的产量和净收益分别提高了 13.2% 和 24.8%。与 CT 相比,ZT 和 FIRB 的能源利用效率(分别为 18.1% 和 19.5%)和碳效率(分别为 9.7% 和 9.1%)都更高。与 CT 相比,FIRB 使系统需水量节省了 5.7%,系统水分生产率提高了 20.2%。研究得出结论,在气候变化的长期条件下,基于土壤测试的 75% 氮肥与绿肥以及稻后作物的 ZT 或 FIRB 是水稻-三叶草-甜玉米系统的最佳适宜实践,可提高系统产量和净收益,同时降低能源-碳-水足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
331
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition is an international, peer reviewed journal devoted to publishing original research findings in the areas of soil science, plant nutrition, agriculture and environmental science. Soil sciences submissions may cover physics, chemistry, biology, microbiology, mineralogy, ecology, pedology, soil classification and amelioration. Plant nutrition and agriculture submissions may include plant production, physiology and metabolism of plants, plant ecology, diversity and sustainability of agricultural systems, organic and inorganic fertilization in relation to their impact on yields, quality of plants and ecological systems, and agroecosystems studies. Submissions covering soil degradation, environmental pollution, nature conservation, and environmental protection are also welcome. The journal considers for publication original research articles, technical notes, short communication, and reviews (both voluntary and by invitation), and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信