Imaging findings of gastric glomus tumors

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, Amar Shah, Cole Thompson, Longwen Chen, Alvin Silva
{"title":"Imaging findings of gastric glomus tumors","authors":"Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, Amar Shah, Cole Thompson, Longwen Chen, Alvin Silva","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04549-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sparse literature describes the imaging findings of gastric glomus tumors (GGT), focusing on benign tumors. We are not aware of prior radiology reports on malignant GGT. The aim of the study was to determine whether it is possible to differentiate between benign and malignant GGT on CT or MR. Institutional radiology and pathology databases were queried for the diagnosis of GGT between January 2010 to December 2023. Of 22 identified subjects, five were excluded due to non-availability of preoperative CT or MR images and three due to lack of pathological confirmation in our institution. The study cohort comprised of 14 patients (males = 6) with median age of 65 years (range 31 to 79 years). Two abdominal radiologists in consensus reviewed all relevant CT and MR images. There were 10 benign and 4 malignant GGT. Benign tumors were smaller than malignant GGT (median size of 2.0 cm vs. 5.3 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.03), more likely to exhibit homogeneous hyperenhancement (9/10 vs. 0/4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and demonstrated intramural rather than exophytic growth. There was no substantial difference in T2 signal or diffusion restriction between benign and malignant GGT. On follow up, benign GGT were essentially stable in size, while malignant GGT grew. A biopsy proven GGT larger than 5 cm or showing necrosis is likely to be malignant. This is important since preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration may be indeterminate for malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04549-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sparse literature describes the imaging findings of gastric glomus tumors (GGT), focusing on benign tumors. We are not aware of prior radiology reports on malignant GGT. The aim of the study was to determine whether it is possible to differentiate between benign and malignant GGT on CT or MR. Institutional radiology and pathology databases were queried for the diagnosis of GGT between January 2010 to December 2023. Of 22 identified subjects, five were excluded due to non-availability of preoperative CT or MR images and three due to lack of pathological confirmation in our institution. The study cohort comprised of 14 patients (males = 6) with median age of 65 years (range 31 to 79 years). Two abdominal radiologists in consensus reviewed all relevant CT and MR images. There were 10 benign and 4 malignant GGT. Benign tumors were smaller than malignant GGT (median size of 2.0 cm vs. 5.3 cm, p = 0.03), more likely to exhibit homogeneous hyperenhancement (9/10 vs. 0/4, p < 0.01), and demonstrated intramural rather than exophytic growth. There was no substantial difference in T2 signal or diffusion restriction between benign and malignant GGT. On follow up, benign GGT were essentially stable in size, while malignant GGT grew. A biopsy proven GGT larger than 5 cm or showing necrosis is likely to be malignant. This is important since preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration may be indeterminate for malignancy.

Abstract Image

胃粘膜瘤的影像学检查结果
描述胃胶膜瘤 (GGT) 影像学发现的文献很少,主要集中在良性肿瘤方面。我们尚未发现有关恶性 GGT 的放射学报告。本研究旨在确定是否可以通过 CT 或 MR 来区分良性和恶性 GGT。我们在机构放射学和病理学数据库中查询了 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间的 GGT 诊断。在确定的 22 例受试者中,有 5 例因无法获得术前 CT 或 MR 图像而被排除,3 例因本院缺乏病理证实而被排除。研究队列包括 14 名患者(男性 = 6),中位年龄为 65 岁(31 至 79 岁)。两名腹部放射科医生在协商一致的基础上审查了所有相关的 CT 和 MR 图像。其中良性 GGT 10 例,恶性 4 例。良性肿瘤比恶性 GGT 小(中位尺寸为 2.0 厘米 vs. 5.3 厘米,p = 0.03),更有可能表现出均质高增强(9/10 vs. 0/4,p <0.01),并且表现为瘤内生长而非瘤外生长。良性 GGT 和恶性 GGT 在 T2 信号或弥散受限方面没有本质区别。在随访中,良性 GGT 的大小基本稳定,而恶性 GGT 则有所增大。活组织检查证实大于 5 厘米或出现坏死的 GGT 很可能是恶性的。这一点很重要,因为术前内镜超声引导下的细针穿刺可能无法确定是否为恶性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信