Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1002/bin.2057

Cody Morris, Elise A. Zarcaro, Jesse Perrin, Megan E. Ellsworth

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Involving clients in therapeutic decisions is a crucial component of effective and ethical behavior‐analytic practice. However, discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness are possible in the course of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to advance the discussion of discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness by (a) reviewing relevant considerations for adapted strategies to involve clients with limited prerequisite skills in therapeutic decisions, (b) presenting clinical data that exemplifies discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness, (c) describing nuanced considerations for navigating discrepancies, and (d) providing suggestions for future research on this topic.

查看原文本刊更多论文

治疗偏好与疗效之间的差异

让客户参与治疗决策是有效和符合道德规范的行为分析实践的重要组成部分。然而，在治疗过程中，求助者对治疗方案的偏好与治疗效果之间可能存在差异。本文旨在通过（a）回顾让先决条件技能有限的客户参与治疗决策的调整策略的相关注意事项，（b）展示客户对治疗方案的偏好与治疗效果之间存在差异的临床数据，（c）描述驾驭差异的细微注意事项，以及（d）为该主题的未来研究提供建议，从而推动对客户对治疗方案的偏好与治疗效果之间存在差异的讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.