Melissa A Stockton,Howard W Francis,Jessica S West,Rachel D Stelmach,Elizabeth Troutman Adams,John D Kraemer,Khalida Saalim,Margaret I Wallhagen,Marco Nyarko,Gabriel Madson,Neal Boafo,Nana Akua V Owusu,Lawrence G Musa,Joni Alberg,Jenny Jae Won Chung,Adam Preston,Emma Gyamera,Shelly Chadha,Lisa P Davis,Suneela Garg,Catherine McMahon,Bolajoko O Olusanya,George A Tavartkiladze,Debara Tucci,Blake S Wilson,Sherri L Smith,Laura Nyblade
{"title":"Development of Measures for d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing Stigma: Introduction to the Special Supplement on Stigma Measurement Tools.","authors":"Melissa A Stockton,Howard W Francis,Jessica S West,Rachel D Stelmach,Elizabeth Troutman Adams,John D Kraemer,Khalida Saalim,Margaret I Wallhagen,Marco Nyarko,Gabriel Madson,Neal Boafo,Nana Akua V Owusu,Lawrence G Musa,Joni Alberg,Jenny Jae Won Chung,Adam Preston,Emma Gyamera,Shelly Chadha,Lisa P Davis,Suneela Garg,Catherine McMahon,Bolajoko O Olusanya,George A Tavartkiladze,Debara Tucci,Blake S Wilson,Sherri L Smith,Laura Nyblade","doi":"10.1097/aud.0000000000001543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/DHH) often experience stigma and discrimination in their daily lives. Qualitative research describing their lived experiences has provided useful, in-depth insights into the pervasiveness of stigma. Quantitative measures could facilitate further investigation of the scope of this phenomenon. Thus, under the auspices of the Lancet Commission on Hearing Loss, we developed and preliminarily validated survey measures of different types of stigma related to d/Deafness and hearing loss in the United States (a high-income country) and Ghana (a lower-middle income country). In this introductory article, we first present working definitions of the different types of stigma; an overview of what is known about stigma in the context of hearing loss; and the motivation underlying the development of measures that capture different types of stigma from the perspectives of different key groups. We then describe the mixed-methods exploratory sequential approach used to develop the stigma measures for several key groups: people who are d/DHH, parents of children who are d/DHH, care partners of people who are d/DHH, healthcare providers, and the general population. The subsequent manuscripts in this special supplement of Ear and Hearing describe the psychometric validation of the various stigma scales developed using these methods.","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/DHH) often experience stigma and discrimination in their daily lives. Qualitative research describing their lived experiences has provided useful, in-depth insights into the pervasiveness of stigma. Quantitative measures could facilitate further investigation of the scope of this phenomenon. Thus, under the auspices of the Lancet Commission on Hearing Loss, we developed and preliminarily validated survey measures of different types of stigma related to d/Deafness and hearing loss in the United States (a high-income country) and Ghana (a lower-middle income country). In this introductory article, we first present working definitions of the different types of stigma; an overview of what is known about stigma in the context of hearing loss; and the motivation underlying the development of measures that capture different types of stigma from the perspectives of different key groups. We then describe the mixed-methods exploratory sequential approach used to develop the stigma measures for several key groups: people who are d/DHH, parents of children who are d/DHH, care partners of people who are d/DHH, healthcare providers, and the general population. The subsequent manuscripts in this special supplement of Ear and Hearing describe the psychometric validation of the various stigma scales developed using these methods.
聋人/听力障碍者(d/DHH)在日常生活中经常会遭遇耻辱和歧视。描述他们生活经历的定性研究为深入了解成见的普遍性提供了有益的启示。定量测量有助于进一步调查这一现象的范围。因此,在柳叶刀听力损失委员会(Lancet Commission on Hearing Loss)的支持下,我们在美国(高收入国家)和加纳(中低收入国家)开发并初步验证了与耳聋和听力损失相关的不同类型成见的调查测量方法。在这篇介绍性文章中,我们首先介绍了不同类型成见的工作定义;概述了有关听力损失成见的已知情况;以及从不同关键群体的视角出发,制定反映不同类型成见的测量方法的动机。然后,我们介绍了采用混合方法探索性顺序法为以下几个关键群体制定污名化测量方法的情况:听力损失患者、听力损失儿童的父母、听力损失患者的护理伙伴、医疗服务提供者和普通人群。本期《耳与听》特别增刊中的后续手稿介绍了使用这些方法开发的各种成见量表的心理测量验证。
期刊介绍:
From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.