{"title":"Evaluation of Early Accommodation Outcomes Following Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.","authors":"Zhirong Xu,Songguo Dong,Sejie Yu,Yuxiao Wu,Hongwei Deng,Jun Zhao","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2403439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe aim of this study is to assess the changes and differences in early postoperative binocular accommodative function following femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this retrospective study, 120 patients (240 eyes) diagnosed with low-to-moderate and high myopia, who underwent either FS-LASIK or SMILE procedures were included. The assessment encompassed measurements of accommodative facility, accommodation time, relaxation time, and accommodation-to-relaxation ratio using a smart flipper. Measurements were taken preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. Additionally, the visual fatigue scale score was assessed and compared at the 1 month mark post-surgery. Changes in parameters were quantified by calculating the difference between preoperative values and those recorded at each postoperative time point.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAt 1 month post-surgery, both FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures demonstrated potential for recovery or even improvement in accommodative facility, accommodation time, relaxation time, and accommodation-to-relaxation ratio compared to preoperative levels. The FS-LASIK group exhibited a greater magnitude of change in accommodative facility postoperatively compared to the SMILE group. In the low-to-moderate myopia subgroup, the FS-LASIK group exhibited lower changes in accommodation time and visual fatigue scale score at 1 month post-surgery compared to the SMILE group, with all associated p-values <0.05.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nEarly postoperative recovery of accommodation function was slower following SMILE compared to FS-LASIK. Additionally, the severity of visual fatigue at 1 month post-surgery was greater in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group. This difference in visual fatigue levels may be attributed to the delayed recovery observed in postoperative SMILE procedures.","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2403439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to assess the changes and differences in early postoperative binocular accommodative function following femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS
In this retrospective study, 120 patients (240 eyes) diagnosed with low-to-moderate and high myopia, who underwent either FS-LASIK or SMILE procedures were included. The assessment encompassed measurements of accommodative facility, accommodation time, relaxation time, and accommodation-to-relaxation ratio using a smart flipper. Measurements were taken preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. Additionally, the visual fatigue scale score was assessed and compared at the 1 month mark post-surgery. Changes in parameters were quantified by calculating the difference between preoperative values and those recorded at each postoperative time point.
RESULTS
At 1 month post-surgery, both FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures demonstrated potential for recovery or even improvement in accommodative facility, accommodation time, relaxation time, and accommodation-to-relaxation ratio compared to preoperative levels. The FS-LASIK group exhibited a greater magnitude of change in accommodative facility postoperatively compared to the SMILE group. In the low-to-moderate myopia subgroup, the FS-LASIK group exhibited lower changes in accommodation time and visual fatigue scale score at 1 month post-surgery compared to the SMILE group, with all associated p-values <0.05.
CONCLUSIONS
Early postoperative recovery of accommodation function was slower following SMILE compared to FS-LASIK. Additionally, the severity of visual fatigue at 1 month post-surgery was greater in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group. This difference in visual fatigue levels may be attributed to the delayed recovery observed in postoperative SMILE procedures.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.