A hybrid approach combining physics-based model with extreme value analysis for temporal probability of rainfall-triggered landslide

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Ho-Hong-Duy Nguyen, Ananta Man Singh Pradhan, Chang-Ho Song, Ji-Sung Lee, Yun-Tae Kim
{"title":"A hybrid approach combining physics-based model with extreme value analysis for temporal probability of rainfall-triggered landslide","authors":"Ho-Hong-Duy Nguyen, Ananta Man Singh Pradhan, Chang-Ho Song, Ji-Sung Lee, Yun-Tae Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10346-024-02366-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interplay between climate change–induced extreme rainfall and slope failure mechanisms presents a significant challenge. To address this, a new temporal modeling of landslides that integrates dynamic rainfall patterns with slope failure mechanisms is proposed. The approach features three steps: (1) analysis of the critical continuous rainfall (CCR) level using a physics-based model with Monte Carlo simulation; (2) calculation of the cumulative distribution function of the generalized extreme value distribution; and (3) estimation of the temporal probability map. Then, combined with the landslide spatial probability obtained from one-dimensional convolution neural network (1D-CNN), the landslide hazard probability was estimated for future periods of 5, 10, 20, and 50 years. The CCR and spatial probability maps were validated using the 2018 landslide event in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The CCR map achieves an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 74.8%. Cohesion and friction angle are the most sensitive in the hybrid model. The proportions of temporal probabilities &gt; 0.5 yielded by the non-stationary model (10, 19, 28, and 38%) were greater than those of the stationary model (6, 10, 16, and 24%) for periods of 5, 10, 20, and 50 years, respectively. The 1D-CNN model (AUC = 84.1%) outperformed logistic regression (AUC = 80.1%) and naïve Bayes (AUC = 80.1%) models. The landslide hazard probability obtained from the non-stationary model is more susceptible than that of the stationary model. These results indicate that the proposed approach is a valuable tool for future landslide risk assessment and may be applicable even in areas without a landslide inventory.</p>","PeriodicalId":17938,"journal":{"name":"Landslides","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landslides","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02366-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interplay between climate change–induced extreme rainfall and slope failure mechanisms presents a significant challenge. To address this, a new temporal modeling of landslides that integrates dynamic rainfall patterns with slope failure mechanisms is proposed. The approach features three steps: (1) analysis of the critical continuous rainfall (CCR) level using a physics-based model with Monte Carlo simulation; (2) calculation of the cumulative distribution function of the generalized extreme value distribution; and (3) estimation of the temporal probability map. Then, combined with the landslide spatial probability obtained from one-dimensional convolution neural network (1D-CNN), the landslide hazard probability was estimated for future periods of 5, 10, 20, and 50 years. The CCR and spatial probability maps were validated using the 2018 landslide event in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The CCR map achieves an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 74.8%. Cohesion and friction angle are the most sensitive in the hybrid model. The proportions of temporal probabilities > 0.5 yielded by the non-stationary model (10, 19, 28, and 38%) were greater than those of the stationary model (6, 10, 16, and 24%) for periods of 5, 10, 20, and 50 years, respectively. The 1D-CNN model (AUC = 84.1%) outperformed logistic regression (AUC = 80.1%) and naïve Bayes (AUC = 80.1%) models. The landslide hazard probability obtained from the non-stationary model is more susceptible than that of the stationary model. These results indicate that the proposed approach is a valuable tool for future landslide risk assessment and may be applicable even in areas without a landslide inventory.

Abstract Image

基于物理模型和极值分析的混合方法,用于分析降雨引发山体滑坡的时间概率
气候变化引起的极端降雨与边坡崩塌机制之间的相互作用是一项重大挑战。为解决这一问题,我们提出了一种新的山体滑坡时间模型,将动态降雨模式与边坡崩塌机制结合起来。该方法包括三个步骤:(1) 利用基于物理的蒙特卡罗模拟模型分析临界连续降雨量(CCR)水平;(2) 计算广义极值分布的累积分布函数;(3) 估计时间概率图。然后,结合一维卷积神经网络(1D-CNN)获得的滑坡空间概率,估算出未来 5 年、10 年、20 年和 50 年的滑坡危害概率。利用日本广岛县 2018 年的滑坡事件对 CCR 和空间概率图进行了验证。CCR地图的接收器工作曲线下面积(AUC)达到74.8%。在混合模型中,内聚力和摩擦角最为敏感。在 5 年、10 年、20 年和 50 年期间,非稳态模型得出的时间概率 > 0.5 的比例(10%、19%、28% 和 38%)分别高于稳态模型(6%、10%、16% 和 24%)。1D-CNN 模型(AUC = 84.1%)优于逻辑回归模型(AUC = 80.1%)和天真贝叶斯模型(AUC = 80.1%)。与静态模型相比,非静态模型得到的滑坡危险概率更易受影响。这些结果表明,所提出的方法是未来滑坡风险评估的重要工具,即使在没有滑坡清单的地区也可能适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landslides
Landslides 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
14.90%
发文量
191
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Landslides are gravitational mass movements of rock, debris or earth. They may occur in conjunction with other major natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Expanding urbanization and changing land-use practices have increased the incidence of landslide disasters. Landslides as catastrophic events include human injury, loss of life and economic devastation and are studied as part of the fields of earth, water and engineering sciences. The aim of the journal Landslides is to be the common platform for the publication of integrated research on landslide processes, hazards, risk analysis, mitigation, and the protection of our cultural heritage and the environment. The journal publishes research papers, news of recent landslide events and information on the activities of the International Consortium on Landslides. - Landslide dynamics, mechanisms and processes - Landslide risk evaluation: hazard assessment, hazard mapping, and vulnerability assessment - Geological, Geotechnical, Hydrological and Geophysical modeling - Effects of meteorological, hydrological and global climatic change factors - Monitoring including remote sensing and other non-invasive systems - New technology, expert and intelligent systems - Application of GIS techniques - Rock slides, rock falls, debris flows, earth flows, and lateral spreads - Large-scale landslides, lahars and pyroclastic flows in volcanic zones - Marine and reservoir related landslides - Landslide related tsunamis and seiches - Landslide disasters in urban areas and along critical infrastructure - Landslides and natural resources - Land development and land-use practices - Landslide remedial measures / prevention works - Temporal and spatial prediction of landslides - Early warning and evacuation - Global landslide database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信