Experimental Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams with Circular Openings Strengthened by GFRP and Steel Bars

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
M. Mirzaie Aliabadi, P. Homami, A. Massumi
{"title":"Experimental Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams with Circular Openings Strengthened by GFRP and Steel Bars","authors":"M. Mirzaie Aliabadi, P. Homami, A. Massumi","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-09541-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the behavior of deep beams with openings that have been reinforced with GFRP and steel bars. A total of 14 reinforced concrete deep beams having a rectangular cross-section of 150 × 500 mm and a total length of 1600 mm were constructed with or without openings and tested up to failure under a four-point bending test. The parameters studied were the opening diameter (140 and 240 mm), number and location of the openings and the shear span-to-depth ratio (<i>a/d</i>). These beams were divided into Group I (<i>a/d</i> = 0.9) and Group II (<i>a/d</i> = 0.5). In each group, one beam had no opening to serve as the control beam. Two beams had one opening in the shear area, two had one at the mid-span of the beam and two had two openings, one on each side of the beam. Finite element modeling with strong correlation with the laboratory results was performed. The results showed that an increase in <i>a/d</i> caused a decrease in the final strength of the beam. The number of openings and their locations on the load transfer path were factors that significantly reduced the ultimate load borne by the beam. Comparison of the test results with the relations provided in design regulations indicated that the ultimate strengths of the beams were higher than the values obtained from the regulations. On average, the values calculated based on ACI 318–19 and Canadian S806-2012 were 86.95 and 55.55% lower than the test results, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":8109,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09541-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the behavior of deep beams with openings that have been reinforced with GFRP and steel bars. A total of 14 reinforced concrete deep beams having a rectangular cross-section of 150 × 500 mm and a total length of 1600 mm were constructed with or without openings and tested up to failure under a four-point bending test. The parameters studied were the opening diameter (140 and 240 mm), number and location of the openings and the shear span-to-depth ratio (a/d). These beams were divided into Group I (a/d = 0.9) and Group II (a/d = 0.5). In each group, one beam had no opening to serve as the control beam. Two beams had one opening in the shear area, two had one at the mid-span of the beam and two had two openings, one on each side of the beam. Finite element modeling with strong correlation with the laboratory results was performed. The results showed that an increase in a/d caused a decrease in the final strength of the beam. The number of openings and their locations on the load transfer path were factors that significantly reduced the ultimate load borne by the beam. Comparison of the test results with the relations provided in design regulations indicated that the ultimate strengths of the beams were higher than the values obtained from the regulations. On average, the values calculated based on ACI 318–19 and Canadian S806-2012 were 86.95 and 55.55% lower than the test results, respectively.

Abstract Image

用 GFRP 和钢筋加固带圆形开口的钢筋混凝土深梁的实验分析
本研究调查了用 GFRP 和钢筋加固的带开口深梁的行为。共建造了 14 根横截面为 150 × 500 毫米矩形、总长度为 1600 毫米的钢筋混凝土深梁,这些深梁有的带开口,有的不带开口,并在四点弯曲试验中进行了直至破坏的测试。研究参数包括开口直径(140 毫米和 240 毫米)、开口数量和位置以及剪切跨度与深度比 (a/d)。这些梁被分为第一组(a/d = 0.9)和第二组(a/d = 0.5)。每组中,有一根梁没有开口,作为对照梁。两根梁在剪切区有一个开口,两根在梁的中跨有一个开口,还有两根在梁的两侧各有一个开口。进行了与实验室结果密切相关的有限元建模。结果表明,a/d 的增加会导致梁的最终强度降低。开口数量及其在荷载传递路径上的位置是显著降低梁所承受极限荷载的因素。将测试结果与设计规定中的关系进行比较后发现,梁的极限强度高于设计规定中的值。平均而言,根据 ACI 318-19 和 Canadian S806-2012 计算得出的数值分别比测试结果低 86.95% 和 55.55%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信