The Use of Nitinol Continuous Compression Implants in Orthopaedic Trauma

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Dylan Mistry, Usama Rahman, Chetan Khatri, William Carlos, Alastair Stephens, Bryan Riemer, Jayne Ward
{"title":"The Use of Nitinol Continuous Compression Implants in Orthopaedic Trauma","authors":"Dylan Mistry, Usama Rahman, Chetan Khatri, William Carlos, Alastair Stephens, Bryan Riemer, Jayne Ward","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01253-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Continuous compression implants (CCIs) can provide continuous compression across a fracture site. They are mainly used in foot/ankle surgery, with very limited descriptions in the literature of their potential for trauma. The aim of this study was to describe the use and associated outcomes of CCIs in modern day trauma practice.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a single-centred case series with a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of any patients who were treated with a CCI across 4 years. The primary outcome was to determine the mode of the CCIs and secondary outcomes were unplanned returns to theatre.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>60 patients were eligible with a mean age of 44.2 and 122 CCIs were used. 51 patients were treated for acute fractures, 9 were treated for non-unions, and 27 patients had open injuries. 42 of the 122 CCIs were used as definitive fixation (midfoot dislocations, an iliac wing fixation and isolated medial malleolus fixation), and the rest as adjuncts for fixation; of this remainder, 39 were used in reduction mode, 38 for fixation of key fragments, and 3 for compression. Ten patients returned to theatre, two for metalwork failure, two for infection and 6 for non-unions—three were acute fractures and three originally non-unions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This paper demonstrates a novel technique for the use of CCIs in UK trauma practice as either definitive fixations or in three different modes as adjuncts to fixation. They do not replace tradition implants but do have equivalent rates of complications. They may be a useful tool in the arsenal for trauma surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01253-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Continuous compression implants (CCIs) can provide continuous compression across a fracture site. They are mainly used in foot/ankle surgery, with very limited descriptions in the literature of their potential for trauma. The aim of this study was to describe the use and associated outcomes of CCIs in modern day trauma practice.

Methods

This was a single-centred case series with a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of any patients who were treated with a CCI across 4 years. The primary outcome was to determine the mode of the CCIs and secondary outcomes were unplanned returns to theatre.

Results

60 patients were eligible with a mean age of 44.2 and 122 CCIs were used. 51 patients were treated for acute fractures, 9 were treated for non-unions, and 27 patients had open injuries. 42 of the 122 CCIs were used as definitive fixation (midfoot dislocations, an iliac wing fixation and isolated medial malleolus fixation), and the rest as adjuncts for fixation; of this remainder, 39 were used in reduction mode, 38 for fixation of key fragments, and 3 for compression. Ten patients returned to theatre, two for metalwork failure, two for infection and 6 for non-unions—three were acute fractures and three originally non-unions.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates a novel technique for the use of CCIs in UK trauma practice as either definitive fixations or in three different modes as adjuncts to fixation. They do not replace tradition implants but do have equivalent rates of complications. They may be a useful tool in the arsenal for trauma surgeons.

Abstract Image

镍钛诺连续加压植入物在创伤骨科中的应用
背景连续加压植入物(CCIs)可对骨折部位进行连续加压。它们主要用于足部/踝部手术,有关其创伤应用潜力的文献描述非常有限。本研究旨在描述CCIs在现代创伤实践中的使用情况和相关结果。方法这是一项单中心病例系列研究,通过对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,该数据库收录了4年内接受过CCI治疗的所有患者。结果60名患者符合条件,平均年龄为44.2岁,共使用了122次CCI。51名患者接受了急性骨折治疗,9名患者接受了非骨折治疗,27名患者为开放性损伤。122枚CCI中有42枚用于最终固定(足中部脱位、髂骨翼固定和孤立的内侧踝骨固定),其余的用于辅助固定;在其余的CCI中,39枚用于还原模式,38枚用于固定关键碎片,3枚用于加压。10 名患者返回手术室,其中 2 人因金属制品失效,2 人因感染,6 人因不愈合--3 人是急性骨折,3 人最初是不愈合。 结论 本文展示了在英国创伤实践中使用 CCIs 作为最终固定物或以三种不同模式作为辅助固定物的新技术。它们不能取代传统的植入物,但并发症发生率相当。它们可能是创伤外科医生的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信