An intersectional feminist analysis of compulsory income management in Australia

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Zoe Staines, Greg Marston, Michelle Peterie, Shelley Bielefeld, Philip Mendes, Steven Roche
{"title":"An intersectional feminist analysis of compulsory income management in Australia","authors":"Zoe Staines, Greg Marston, Michelle Peterie, Shelley Bielefeld, Philip Mendes, Steven Roche","doi":"10.1017/s0047279424000205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, women experience poverty at disproportionate rates to men, with the situation being worse for Indigenous women and women of colour. Social security systems are one avenue for income redistribution that can alleviate poverty. However, such systems are themselves embedded within and produced by unequal social relations, meaning they can also serve to perpetuate and exacerbate social inequalities. This is exemplified under neoliberal welfare reforms, which have disproportionate negative impacts for women across the world (e.g. increased poverty and stigma, reduced health/wellbeing, and more). Again, this is particularly the case for Indigenous women and women of colour. In this article, we offer an intersectional feminist analysis of an intensive form of neoliberal welfare conditionality, Australia’s ‘compulsory income management’ program (CIM). CIM quarantines social security incomes onto cashless bank cards to restrict expenditure to ‘approved’ items. Drawing on interviews and surveys with 170 individuals who have personally experienced CIM, we show that it has myriad negative impacts that are especially borne by (Indigenous) women. These are not, we argue, <jats:italic>unintended</jats:italic> policy impacts, but are instead symptomatic of the gendered and racialised violence that is woven into patriarchal capitalism more broadly. Thus, the experience of CIM holds lessons for welfare states internationally.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279424000205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, women experience poverty at disproportionate rates to men, with the situation being worse for Indigenous women and women of colour. Social security systems are one avenue for income redistribution that can alleviate poverty. However, such systems are themselves embedded within and produced by unequal social relations, meaning they can also serve to perpetuate and exacerbate social inequalities. This is exemplified under neoliberal welfare reforms, which have disproportionate negative impacts for women across the world (e.g. increased poverty and stigma, reduced health/wellbeing, and more). Again, this is particularly the case for Indigenous women and women of colour. In this article, we offer an intersectional feminist analysis of an intensive form of neoliberal welfare conditionality, Australia’s ‘compulsory income management’ program (CIM). CIM quarantines social security incomes onto cashless bank cards to restrict expenditure to ‘approved’ items. Drawing on interviews and surveys with 170 individuals who have personally experienced CIM, we show that it has myriad negative impacts that are especially borne by (Indigenous) women. These are not, we argue, unintended policy impacts, but are instead symptomatic of the gendered and racialised violence that is woven into patriarchal capitalism more broadly. Thus, the experience of CIM holds lessons for welfare states internationally.
对澳大利亚强制收入管理的跨部门女权主义分析
在全球范围内,妇女的贫困率与男性不成比例,土著妇女和有色人种妇女的情况更为严重。社会保障制度是收入再分配的一种途径,可以减轻贫困。然而,这种制度本身也嵌入了不平等的社会关系之中,并由不平等的社会关系所产生,这意味着它们也可能使社会不平等永久化并加剧。这一点在新自由主义的福利改革中得到了很好的体现,这种改革对世界各地的妇女产生了不成比例的负面影响(如贫困和耻辱感加剧、健康/福祉下降等)。土著妇女和有色人种妇女的情况尤其如此。在本文中,我们将对新自由主义福利条件性的一种强化形式--澳大利亚的 "强制收入管理 "计划(CIM)--进行跨部门的女权主义分析。强制收入管理计划将社会保障收入隔离到无现金银行卡中,将支出限制在 "经批准 "的项目上。通过对 170 名亲身经历过 CIM 的人进行访谈和调查,我们发现 CIM 带来了无数负面影响,尤其是(土著)妇女。我们认为,这些并非政策无意造成的影响,而是更广泛地交织在父权资本主义中的性别和种族暴力的表征。因此,CIM 的经验值得国际福利国家借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Policy carries high quality articles on all aspects of social policy in an international context. It places particular emphasis upon articles which seek to contribute to debates on the future direction of social policy, to present new empirical data, to advance theories, or to analyse issues in the making and implementation of social policies. The Journal of Social Policy is part of the "Social Policy Package", which also includes Social Policy and Society and the Social Policy Digest. An online resource, the Social Policy Digest, was launched in 2003. The Digest provides a regularly up-dated, fully searchable, summary of policy developments and research findings across the whole range of social policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信