Developing a Maturity Rating System for Project Management Offices

IF 2.3 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.3390/systems12090367
Abdullah M. Alshabragi, Abdulmohsen S. Almohsen, Abdulrahman A. Bin Mahmoud
{"title":"Developing a Maturity Rating System for Project Management Offices","authors":"Abdullah M. Alshabragi, Abdulmohsen S. Almohsen, Abdulrahman A. Bin Mahmoud","doi":"10.3390/systems12090367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective project management is crucial for organizations to achieve strategic objectives and maintain competitiveness in today’s market. The project management office (PMO) has emerged as a key enabler in enhancing project management effectiveness through centralized oversight, support, and standardization. However, evaluating the effectiveness of PMOs and identifying areas for improvement remain challenging. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of project management effectiveness and the role of PMOs in achieving organizational success by establishing a maturity rating system. The research objectives include identifying critical success factors relevant to sustainable PMO effectiveness, reviewing existing literature on project management maturity models, analyzing data through literature review and questionnaires, developing a rating system based on identified success factors, and contributing to the existing literature on PMOs. The literature review and thematic analysis identified five critical themes—organizational culture, governance, competence, project controls, and engagement—each with corresponding success factors. Questionnaires were used to assess the maturity levels and relative importance of these factors, where the AHP analysis determined the weighted importance of each success factor and category. The results highlight the critical success factors for PMOs: collaboration, effective leadership, alignment with organizational goals, knowledge management, project planning, risk management, stakeholder satisfaction, and communication. By establishing a standardized and objective approach to evaluating sustainable PMO effectiveness, organizations can enhance their sustainable project management practices, improve project success rates, and address the challenges associated with evaluating PMO performance. Ultimately, adopting a systems approach enables PMOs to align strategies with organizational goals and foster a culture of continuous improvement.","PeriodicalId":36394,"journal":{"name":"Systems","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective project management is crucial for organizations to achieve strategic objectives and maintain competitiveness in today’s market. The project management office (PMO) has emerged as a key enabler in enhancing project management effectiveness through centralized oversight, support, and standardization. However, evaluating the effectiveness of PMOs and identifying areas for improvement remain challenging. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of project management effectiveness and the role of PMOs in achieving organizational success by establishing a maturity rating system. The research objectives include identifying critical success factors relevant to sustainable PMO effectiveness, reviewing existing literature on project management maturity models, analyzing data through literature review and questionnaires, developing a rating system based on identified success factors, and contributing to the existing literature on PMOs. The literature review and thematic analysis identified five critical themes—organizational culture, governance, competence, project controls, and engagement—each with corresponding success factors. Questionnaires were used to assess the maturity levels and relative importance of these factors, where the AHP analysis determined the weighted importance of each success factor and category. The results highlight the critical success factors for PMOs: collaboration, effective leadership, alignment with organizational goals, knowledge management, project planning, risk management, stakeholder satisfaction, and communication. By establishing a standardized and objective approach to evaluating sustainable PMO effectiveness, organizations can enhance their sustainable project management practices, improve project success rates, and address the challenges associated with evaluating PMO performance. Ultimately, adopting a systems approach enables PMOs to align strategies with organizational goals and foster a culture of continuous improvement.
开发项目管理办公室成熟度评级系统
有效的项目管理对于企业实现战略目标和保持当今市场竞争力至关重要。项目管理办公室(PMO)通过集中监督、支持和标准化,已成为提高项目管理效率的关键因素。然而,评估项目管理办公室的有效性和确定需要改进的领域仍然具有挑战性。本文旨在通过建立成熟度评级系统,全面概述项目管理的有效性和项目管理办公室在实现组织成功中的作用。研究目标包括确定与可持续项目管理办公室有效性相关的关键成功因素,回顾有关项目管理成熟度模型的现有文献,通过文献回顾和问卷调查分析数据,根据确定的成功因素制定评级系统,并为有关项目管理办公室的现有文献做出贡献。文献综述和主题分析确定了五个关键主题--组织文化、治理、能力、项目控制和参与--每个主题都有相应的成功因素。调查问卷用于评估这些因素的成熟度和相对重要性,AHP 分析确定了每个成功因素和类别的加权重要性。结果强调了项目管理办公室的关键成功因素:协作、有效领导、与组织目标保持一致、知识管理、项目规划、风险管理、利益相关者满意度和沟通。通过建立标准化的客观方法来评估可持续项目管理办公室的有效性,组织可以加强其可持续项目管理实践,提高项目成功率,并应对与评估项目管理办公室绩效相关的挑战。最终,采用系统方法可使项目管理办公室的战略与组织目标保持一致,并培养一种持续改进的文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systems
Systems Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信