Bisexual minority stress as a risk factor for sexual violence‐related posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among bisexual+ women: A multilevel analysis

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Selime R. Salim, Kelly L. Harper, Nicholas A. Livingston, Brian A. Feinstein, Terri L. Messman
{"title":"Bisexual minority stress as a risk factor for sexual violence‐related posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among bisexual+ women: A multilevel analysis","authors":"Selime R. Salim, Kelly L. Harper, Nicholas A. Livingston, Brian A. Feinstein, Terri L. Messman","doi":"10.1002/jts.23102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bisexual+ (e.g., bisexual, pansexual, queer) women experience higher rates of sexual violence (SV) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than heterosexual and lesbian women, as well as unique identity‐related minority stress. We examined between‐ and within‐person associations between bisexual minority stress and PTSD symptoms related to SV in a sample of young bisexual+ women (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 133) who reported adult SV (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic><jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 22.0 years, range: 18–25 years; 85.0% White; 99.3% cisgender). We analyzed data from four waves of data collection (baseline to 3‐month follow‐up) using multilevel models. Controlling for SV severity, there was a significant within‐person effect of antibisexual stigma from lesbian/gay people on PTSD, β = .17, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .010, suggesting that at waves when women experienced more stigma, they also reported higher PTSD symptom levels. At the between‐person level, women who reported higher levels of antibisexual stigma from heterosexual people, β = .26, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .043, and anticipated binegativity, β = .29, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .005, on average across study waves also reported higher average levels of PTSD. Additionally, anticipated binegativity explained the association between average antibisexual stigma and PTSD, β = .15, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .014, 95% CI [0.45, 4.61]. Bisexual minority stress may be associated with higher PTSD symptom severity following SV among young bisexual+ women, and the anticipation of binegativity may be a target mechanism in this association. Study findings highlight the importance of examining the joint contributions of SV and minority stress to identify novel targets for future research and practice to address PTSD symptoms.","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bisexual+ (e.g., bisexual, pansexual, queer) women experience higher rates of sexual violence (SV) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than heterosexual and lesbian women, as well as unique identity‐related minority stress. We examined between‐ and within‐person associations between bisexual minority stress and PTSD symptoms related to SV in a sample of young bisexual+ women (N = 133) who reported adult SV (Mage = 22.0 years, range: 18–25 years; 85.0% White; 99.3% cisgender). We analyzed data from four waves of data collection (baseline to 3‐month follow‐up) using multilevel models. Controlling for SV severity, there was a significant within‐person effect of antibisexual stigma from lesbian/gay people on PTSD, β = .17, p = .010, suggesting that at waves when women experienced more stigma, they also reported higher PTSD symptom levels. At the between‐person level, women who reported higher levels of antibisexual stigma from heterosexual people, β = .26, p = .043, and anticipated binegativity, β = .29, p = .005, on average across study waves also reported higher average levels of PTSD. Additionally, anticipated binegativity explained the association between average antibisexual stigma and PTSD, β = .15, p = .014, 95% CI [0.45, 4.61]. Bisexual minority stress may be associated with higher PTSD symptom severity following SV among young bisexual+ women, and the anticipation of binegativity may be a target mechanism in this association. Study findings highlight the importance of examining the joint contributions of SV and minority stress to identify novel targets for future research and practice to address PTSD symptoms.
双性恋少数群体压力是双性恋以上女性出现性暴力相关创伤后应激障碍症状的风险因素:多层次分析
与异性恋和女同性恋女性相比,双性恋+(如双性恋、泛性恋、同性恋)女性遭受性暴力(SV)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的比例更高,她们还承受着独特的与身份相关的少数群体压力。我们研究了双性恋少数群体压力与与 SV 相关的创伤后应激障碍症状之间的人际关系和人内关系,研究对象是报告了成年 SV 的年轻双性恋+女性样本(N = 133)(年龄 = 22.0 岁,范围:18-25 岁;85.0% 白人;99.3% 顺性别)。我们使用多层次模型分析了四波数据收集(基线至 3 个月随访)中的数据。在控制 SV 严重程度的情况下,来自女同性恋/男同性恋的反性污名对创伤后应激障碍有显著的人内效应,β = .17,p = .010,这表明在女性经历更多污名的波次中,她们也报告了更高的创伤后应激障碍症状水平。在人与人之间的水平上,在不同的研究波次中,平均受到异性恋者较高程度的反性污名(β = .26,p = .043)和预期二元性(β = .29,p = .005)的女性也报告了较高的创伤后应激障碍平均水平。此外,预期的二元性可以解释平均反双性恋污名与创伤后应激障碍之间的关系,β = .15,p = .014,95% CI [0.45,4.61]。双性恋少数群体的压力可能与年轻的双性恋+女性在SV后较高的创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度有关,而对二元性的预期可能是这种关联的目标机制。研究结果凸显了研究 SV 和少数群体压力共同作用的重要性,从而为未来研究和实践找到解决创伤后应激障碍症状的新目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信