The superior value of radiomics to sonographic assessment for ultrasound-based evaluation of extrathyroidal extension in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Extrathyroidal extension was related with worse survival for patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. For its preoperative evaluation, we measured and compared the predicting value of sonographic method and ultrasonic radiomics method in nodules of papillary thyroid carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 337 nodules were included and divided into training group and validation group. For ultrasonic radiomics method, a best model was constructed based on clinical characteristics and ultrasonic radiomic features. The predicting value was calculated then. For sonographic method, the results were calculated using all samples. RESULTS For ultrasonic radiomics method, we constructed 9 models and selected the extreme gradient boosting model for its highest accuracy (0.77) and area under curve (0.813) in validation group. The accuracy and area under curve of sonographic method was 0.70 and 0.569. Meanwhile. We found that the top-6 important features of xgboost model included no clinical characteristics, all of whom were high-dimensional radiomic features. CONCLUSIONS The study showed the superior value of ultrasonic radiomics method to sonographic method for preoperative detection of extrathyroidal extension in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Furthermore, high-dimensional radiomic features were more important than clinical characteristics.