Experimental examination on electrochemical micro-machining of Mg–Li–Sr biomedical alloy: Application of ANOVA, Deng’s similarity, and ANFIS for effective modeling optimization
IF 1.4 4区 物理与天体物理Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
V. Kavimani, P. M. Gopal, V. Sivamaran, Sameer Algburi, Debabrata Barik, Prabhu Paramasivam, Abdullah H. Alsabhan, Shamshad Alam
{"title":"Experimental examination on electrochemical micro-machining of Mg–Li–Sr biomedical alloy: Application of ANOVA, Deng’s similarity, and ANFIS for effective modeling optimization","authors":"V. Kavimani, P. M. Gopal, V. Sivamaran, Sameer Algburi, Debabrata Barik, Prabhu Paramasivam, Abdullah H. Alsabhan, Shamshad Alam","doi":"10.1063/5.0220057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, a newly discovered biomedical grade Magnesium–Lithium–Strontium (Mg–Li–Sr) alloy is machined using electrochemical machining technology. Two main output constraints employed on the research project to evaluate machinability are surface roughness (Ra) and material removal rate (MRR). Changing feed rate (FR), current, electrolyte concentration (EC), and voltage is required in order to carry out experimental experiments. The trials were designed using the Taguchi method. The ANOVA findings show that current is the most significant factor, after voltage as the most significant input parameter in regulating Ra and MRR. The ideal parameter configuration for the CRITIC-linked Deng’s similarity approach method was 5 V, 1 A of current, 0.4 mm/min of FR, and 20 g/l of EC. The final product was a 0.0323 mm/min MRR and a 2.61 μm surface roughness. Furthermore, the response variables are anticipated using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy Inference System, which finally results in predictions that are very similar to the experimental results.","PeriodicalId":7619,"journal":{"name":"AIP Advances","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0220057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work, a newly discovered biomedical grade Magnesium–Lithium–Strontium (Mg–Li–Sr) alloy is machined using electrochemical machining technology. Two main output constraints employed on the research project to evaluate machinability are surface roughness (Ra) and material removal rate (MRR). Changing feed rate (FR), current, electrolyte concentration (EC), and voltage is required in order to carry out experimental experiments. The trials were designed using the Taguchi method. The ANOVA findings show that current is the most significant factor, after voltage as the most significant input parameter in regulating Ra and MRR. The ideal parameter configuration for the CRITIC-linked Deng’s similarity approach method was 5 V, 1 A of current, 0.4 mm/min of FR, and 20 g/l of EC. The final product was a 0.0323 mm/min MRR and a 2.61 μm surface roughness. Furthermore, the response variables are anticipated using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy Inference System, which finally results in predictions that are very similar to the experimental results.
期刊介绍:
AIP Advances is an open access journal publishing in all areas of physical sciences—applied, theoretical, and experimental. All published articles are freely available to read, download, and share. The journal prides itself on the belief that all good science is important and relevant. Our inclusive scope and publication standards make it an essential outlet for scientists in the physical sciences.
AIP Advances is a community-based journal, with a fast production cycle. The quick publication process and open-access model allows us to quickly distribute new scientific concepts. Our Editors, assisted by peer review, determine whether a manuscript is technically correct and original. After publication, the readership evaluates whether a manuscript is timely, relevant, or significant.