A Review on Flood Risk Conceptual Frameworks and Development of Hierarchical Structures for Assessment Criteria

Nazgol Tabasi, Mohammad Fereshtehpour, Bardia Roghani
{"title":"A Review on Flood Risk Conceptual Frameworks and Development of Hierarchical Structures for Assessment Criteria","authors":"Nazgol Tabasi, Mohammad Fereshtehpour, Bardia Roghani","doi":"arxiv-2409.08803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change and rapid urbanization have led to more frequent and severe\nflooding, causing significant damage. The existing literature on flood risk\nencompasses a variety of dimensions, such as physical, economic, social,\npolitical, environmental, infrastructural, and managerial aspects. This paper\naims to provide an extensive review of proposed conceptual frameworks and their\ncomponents used in flood risk assessment. For this purpose, Initially,\nconceptual frameworks were extracted to configure the components of flood risk\nincluding hazard, vulnerability, exposure, resilience, and susceptibility.\nSubsequently, a comprehensive set of criteria from the literature were\nidentified, addressing risk components. In this paper, the risk conceptual\nframework is defined by the intersection of vulnerability and hazard.\nVulnerability, shaped by exposure and susceptibility, can be reduced by\nenhancing resiliency, which includes coping and adaptive capacities. In total,\n102 criteria/subcriteria were identified and classified into three hierarchical\nstructures of hazard, susceptibility, and resilience. Finally, flood risk\nassessment methods were reviewed, with an emphasis on their applicability and\ncharacteristics. The review highlighted the strengths and limitations of\nvarious methods, providing a comprehensive overview of their suitability for\ndifferent scenarios. The outcomes of this review could serve as a valuable\nreference for professionals involved in flood risk assessment, aiding in the\nidentification of the most appropriate risk concepts, assessment criteria, and\nsuitable methods for quantification based on the specific study area and data\navailability.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change and rapid urbanization have led to more frequent and severe flooding, causing significant damage. The existing literature on flood risk encompasses a variety of dimensions, such as physical, economic, social, political, environmental, infrastructural, and managerial aspects. This paper aims to provide an extensive review of proposed conceptual frameworks and their components used in flood risk assessment. For this purpose, Initially, conceptual frameworks were extracted to configure the components of flood risk including hazard, vulnerability, exposure, resilience, and susceptibility. Subsequently, a comprehensive set of criteria from the literature were identified, addressing risk components. In this paper, the risk conceptual framework is defined by the intersection of vulnerability and hazard. Vulnerability, shaped by exposure and susceptibility, can be reduced by enhancing resiliency, which includes coping and adaptive capacities. In total, 102 criteria/subcriteria were identified and classified into three hierarchical structures of hazard, susceptibility, and resilience. Finally, flood risk assessment methods were reviewed, with an emphasis on their applicability and characteristics. The review highlighted the strengths and limitations of various methods, providing a comprehensive overview of their suitability for different scenarios. The outcomes of this review could serve as a valuable reference for professionals involved in flood risk assessment, aiding in the identification of the most appropriate risk concepts, assessment criteria, and suitable methods for quantification based on the specific study area and data availability.
洪水风险概念框架与评估标准分层结构发展综述
气候变化和快速城市化导致洪灾更加频繁和严重,造成巨大损失。有关洪水风险的现有文献涵盖了多个方面,如物理、经济、社会、政治、环境、基础设施和管理方面。本文旨在对洪水风险评估中使用的拟议概念框架及其组成部分进行广泛评述。为此,本文首先提取了概念框架,以确定洪水风险的组成部分,包括危害、脆弱性、风险暴露、恢复力和易感性。在本文中,风险概念框架是由脆弱性和灾害的交叉点定义的。脆弱性由暴露和易感性决定,可通过增强复原力(包括应对和适应能力)来降低。共确定了 102 项标准/次级标准,并将其划分为危害、易感性和复原力三个层次结构。最后,对洪水风险评估方法进行了审查,重点是其适用性和特点。审查强调了各种方法的优势和局限性,全面概述了这些方法在不同情况下的适用性。本次审查的结果可作为参与洪水风险评估的专业人员的重要参考,有助于确定最合适的风险概念、评估标准以及基于特定研究区域和数据可用性的合适量化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信