Nazgol Tabasi, Mohammad Fereshtehpour, Bardia Roghani
{"title":"A Review on Flood Risk Conceptual Frameworks and Development of Hierarchical Structures for Assessment Criteria","authors":"Nazgol Tabasi, Mohammad Fereshtehpour, Bardia Roghani","doi":"arxiv-2409.08803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change and rapid urbanization have led to more frequent and severe\nflooding, causing significant damage. The existing literature on flood risk\nencompasses a variety of dimensions, such as physical, economic, social,\npolitical, environmental, infrastructural, and managerial aspects. This paper\naims to provide an extensive review of proposed conceptual frameworks and their\ncomponents used in flood risk assessment. For this purpose, Initially,\nconceptual frameworks were extracted to configure the components of flood risk\nincluding hazard, vulnerability, exposure, resilience, and susceptibility.\nSubsequently, a comprehensive set of criteria from the literature were\nidentified, addressing risk components. In this paper, the risk conceptual\nframework is defined by the intersection of vulnerability and hazard.\nVulnerability, shaped by exposure and susceptibility, can be reduced by\nenhancing resiliency, which includes coping and adaptive capacities. In total,\n102 criteria/subcriteria were identified and classified into three hierarchical\nstructures of hazard, susceptibility, and resilience. Finally, flood risk\nassessment methods were reviewed, with an emphasis on their applicability and\ncharacteristics. The review highlighted the strengths and limitations of\nvarious methods, providing a comprehensive overview of their suitability for\ndifferent scenarios. The outcomes of this review could serve as a valuable\nreference for professionals involved in flood risk assessment, aiding in the\nidentification of the most appropriate risk concepts, assessment criteria, and\nsuitable methods for quantification based on the specific study area and data\navailability.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate change and rapid urbanization have led to more frequent and severe
flooding, causing significant damage. The existing literature on flood risk
encompasses a variety of dimensions, such as physical, economic, social,
political, environmental, infrastructural, and managerial aspects. This paper
aims to provide an extensive review of proposed conceptual frameworks and their
components used in flood risk assessment. For this purpose, Initially,
conceptual frameworks were extracted to configure the components of flood risk
including hazard, vulnerability, exposure, resilience, and susceptibility.
Subsequently, a comprehensive set of criteria from the literature were
identified, addressing risk components. In this paper, the risk conceptual
framework is defined by the intersection of vulnerability and hazard.
Vulnerability, shaped by exposure and susceptibility, can be reduced by
enhancing resiliency, which includes coping and adaptive capacities. In total,
102 criteria/subcriteria were identified and classified into three hierarchical
structures of hazard, susceptibility, and resilience. Finally, flood risk
assessment methods were reviewed, with an emphasis on their applicability and
characteristics. The review highlighted the strengths and limitations of
various methods, providing a comprehensive overview of their suitability for
different scenarios. The outcomes of this review could serve as a valuable
reference for professionals involved in flood risk assessment, aiding in the
identification of the most appropriate risk concepts, assessment criteria, and
suitable methods for quantification based on the specific study area and data
availability.