Pain Is Modulated Differently Between Females with and without Patellofemoral Pain: Factors Related to Sensitization.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Kemery J Sigmund,Marie K Hoeger Bement,Wendy E Huddleston,Kyle T Ebersole,Jennifer E Earl-Boehm
{"title":"Pain Is Modulated Differently Between Females with and without Patellofemoral Pain: Factors Related to Sensitization.","authors":"Kemery J Sigmund,Marie K Hoeger Bement,Wendy E Huddleston,Kyle T Ebersole,Jennifer E Earl-Boehm","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0124.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nPatellofemoral pain (PFP) has poor long-term recovery outcomes. Central sensitization describes central nervous system changes altering pain modulation, which can complicate recovery (poorer prognosis, worse function). Signs of central sensitization include amplified pain facilitation, pain hypersensitivity, and impaired pain inhibition, which can be measured with temporal summation of pain (TSP), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), respectively. Sex differences exist for these test responses, but female-only PFP investigations of sensitization are uncommon. Understanding pain modulation in females with PFP could improve treatment protocols.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo determine whether females with PFP exhibit signs of central sensitization (greater TSP, lower PPTs, reduced CPM) compared to pain-free females.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nCross-sectional Setting: Laboratory Patients or Other Participants: Thirty-three females [(20 PFP, 13 pain-free); Age: PFP 29.2 ± 7 years, pain-free 28 ± 7 years; Height: PFP 166.7 ± 5.9cm, pain-free 166 ± 9.5cm, Mass: PFP 66.7 ± 9.6kg, pain-free 69.3 ± 7.5kg).\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nTSP was assessed with ten punctate stimuli applied to the knee and calculated by the difference in pain intensity between beginning and end responses. PPTs were tested at four sites [3 for local hypersensitivity (knee), 1 for widespread hypersensitivity (hand)]. CPM was conducted by comparing PPTs during two conditions (baseline, ice immersion). CPM response was defined as the percent difference between conditions. Between-group differences in TSP response were analyzed with a Welch's test. Separate Welch's tests analyzed group comparisons of PPTs and CPM responses at four sites.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFemales with PFP exhibited greater TSP response (P=0.019) and lower CPM response at patella center (P=0.010) and hand sites (P=0.007) than pain-free females. PPT group differences were not observed at any site (P>0.0125).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFemales with PFP modulate pain differently than pain-free females. Clinicians should recognize signs of central sensitization and their potential impact on treatment options.","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0124.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Patellofemoral pain (PFP) has poor long-term recovery outcomes. Central sensitization describes central nervous system changes altering pain modulation, which can complicate recovery (poorer prognosis, worse function). Signs of central sensitization include amplified pain facilitation, pain hypersensitivity, and impaired pain inhibition, which can be measured with temporal summation of pain (TSP), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), respectively. Sex differences exist for these test responses, but female-only PFP investigations of sensitization are uncommon. Understanding pain modulation in females with PFP could improve treatment protocols. OBJECTIVE To determine whether females with PFP exhibit signs of central sensitization (greater TSP, lower PPTs, reduced CPM) compared to pain-free females. DESIGN Cross-sectional Setting: Laboratory Patients or Other Participants: Thirty-three females [(20 PFP, 13 pain-free); Age: PFP 29.2 ± 7 years, pain-free 28 ± 7 years; Height: PFP 166.7 ± 5.9cm, pain-free 166 ± 9.5cm, Mass: PFP 66.7 ± 9.6kg, pain-free 69.3 ± 7.5kg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES TSP was assessed with ten punctate stimuli applied to the knee and calculated by the difference in pain intensity between beginning and end responses. PPTs were tested at four sites [3 for local hypersensitivity (knee), 1 for widespread hypersensitivity (hand)]. CPM was conducted by comparing PPTs during two conditions (baseline, ice immersion). CPM response was defined as the percent difference between conditions. Between-group differences in TSP response were analyzed with a Welch's test. Separate Welch's tests analyzed group comparisons of PPTs and CPM responses at four sites. RESULTS Females with PFP exhibited greater TSP response (P=0.019) and lower CPM response at patella center (P=0.010) and hand sites (P=0.007) than pain-free females. PPT group differences were not observed at any site (P>0.0125). CONCLUSIONS Females with PFP modulate pain differently than pain-free females. Clinicians should recognize signs of central sensitization and their potential impact on treatment options.
髌骨股骨疼痛女性与非髌骨股骨疼痛女性的疼痛调节方式不同:与敏感化有关的因素。
内容提要髌骨股骨痛(PFP)的长期康复效果不佳。中枢敏感化描述了改变疼痛调节的中枢神经系统变化,这可能会使康复复杂化(预后更差、功能更差)。中枢敏感化的迹象包括疼痛促进扩大、痛觉过敏和疼痛抑制受损,可分别通过疼痛时间总和(TSP)、压力痛阈值(PPT)和条件性疼痛调制(CPM)来测量。这些测试反应存在性别差异,但仅针对女性的 PFP 敏感性研究并不常见。目的确定与无痛女性相比,患有 PFP 的女性是否表现出中枢敏感化的迹象(TSP 更大、PPTs 更低、CPM 更小):实验室 患者或其他参与者33 名女性[(20 名 PFP 患者,13 名无痛患者);年龄:PFP 29.2 ± 7 岁,无痛患者 29.2 ± 7 岁:年龄:PFP 29.2 ± 7 岁,无痛 28 ± 7 岁;身高:PFP 166.7 ± 5.5 厘米,无痛 166.7 ± 5.5 厘米:身高:PFP 166.7 ± 5.9 厘米,无痛者 166 ± 9.5 厘米;体重:PFP 66.7 ± 9.5 厘米,无痛者 66.7 ± 9.5 厘米:主要结果测量PTSP通过膝关节上的十个点状刺激进行评估,并通过开始和结束反应之间的疼痛强度差异进行计算。PPT在四个部位进行测试[3个部位为局部过敏(膝关节),1个部位为广泛过敏(手部)]。CPM 通过比较两种情况(基线、冰浸)下的 PPT 进行。CPM 反应被定义为条件间差异的百分比。用韦尔奇检验分析 TSP 反应的组间差异。结果与无痛女性相比,PFP 女性的 TSP 反应更大(P=0.019),髌骨中心(P=0.010)和手部(P=0.007)的 CPM 反应更低。在任何部位均未观察到 PPT 组差异(P>0.0125)。临床医生应认识到中枢敏化的迹象及其对治疗方案的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信