Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Series of Five Case Reports on an Innovative Implant Design

Q1 Mathematics

Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.3390/app14188354

Marco Aurélio Bianchini, Mario Escobar, Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Thalles Yurgen Balduino, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke

{"title":"Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Series of Five Case Reports on an Innovative Implant Design","authors":"Marco Aurélio Bianchini, Mario Escobar, Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Thalles Yurgen Balduino, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke","doi":"10.3390/app14188354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in this area. The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the new cervical implant design in maintaining peri-implant tissue stability. Materials and Methods: Five clinical cases involving completely edentulous patients were selected, in which 25 implants were installed. The marginal bone level around each implant was assessed at three different time points—T0: immediately after the prosthesis installation, T1: 6 months post installation, and T2: at the last control visit, up to 38 months later. Measurements were taken to analyze changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs) and the keratinized mucosa (KM) over time. Furthermore, the keratinized mucosa (KM) around the implants was evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation values of the marginal bone levels at each time point were as follows—T0: 0.59 ± 0.55 mm; T1: 1.41 ± 0.59 mm; T2: 1.76 ± 0.69 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences across the time points (ANOVA p < 0.0001). The overall mean KM values were 3.85 mm for T1 and T2, showing the stability of the peri-implant soft tissues at ≥1-year controls. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results showed that the Collo implants presented measured MBL values increasing within the time range analyzed in each case but within the normal values cited in the literature for these types of rehabilitation treatments. However, the measured KM values presented, in all cases, an average above the values referenced in the literature as a minimum for maintaining the health of the peri-implant tissues.","PeriodicalId":8224,"journal":{"name":"Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in this area. The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the new cervical implant design in maintaining peri-implant tissue stability. Materials and Methods: Five clinical cases involving completely edentulous patients were selected, in which 25 implants were installed. The marginal bone level around each implant was assessed at three different time points—T0: immediately after the prosthesis installation, T1: 6 months post installation, and T2: at the last control visit, up to 38 months later. Measurements were taken to analyze changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs) and the keratinized mucosa (KM) over time. Furthermore, the keratinized mucosa (KM) around the implants was evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation values of the marginal bone levels at each time point were as follows—T0: 0.59 ± 0.55 mm; T1: 1.41 ± 0.59 mm; T2: 1.76 ± 0.69 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences across the time points (ANOVA p < 0.0001). The overall mean KM values were 3.85 mm for T1 and T2, showing the stability of the peri-implant soft tissues at ≥1-year controls. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results showed that the Collo implants presented measured MBL values increasing within the time range analyzed in each case but within the normal values cited in the literature for these types of rehabilitation treatments. However, the measured KM values presented, in all cases, an average above the values referenced in the literature as a minimum for maintaining the health of the peri-implant tissues.

查看原文本刊更多论文

种植体周围组织稳定性：关于创新种植体设计的五例系列报告

背景/目的：种植体周围组织的稳定性对于种植牙治疗的长期成功至关重要。为了应对种植体周围组织稳定性的挑战，我们开发了一种新的颈部种植体设计，其特点是颈部凹陷，以增加该区域的组织容积。本研究旨在对新型颈部种植体设计在保持种植体周围组织稳定性方面的有效性进行临床评估。材料和方法：选取五例完全无牙颌患者的临床病例，共安装 25 个种植体。在三个不同的时间点对每个种植体周围的边缘骨水平进行了评估--T0：安装修复体后立即进行；T1：安装后 6 个月；T2：38 个月后的最后一次对照检查。测量结果用于分析边缘骨水平（MBLs）和角化粘膜（KM）随时间的变化。此外，还对种植体周围的角化粘膜（KM）进行了评估。结果：各时间点边缘骨水平的平均值和标准差如下-T0：0.59 ± 0.55 mm；T1：1.41 ± 0.59 mm；T2：1.76 ± 0.69 mm。统计分析显示，各时间点之间存在明显差异（方差分析 p < 0.0001）。T1和T2的总体平均KM值为3.85 mm，表明种植体周围软组织在≥1年的对照中保持稳定。结论：在本研究的局限性范围内，结果显示 Collo 种植体的 MBL 测量值在每个病例的分析时间范围内都在增加，但在文献引用的此类康复治疗的正常值范围内。但是，在所有情况下，测量的 KM 值的平均值都高于文献中提到的维持种植体周围组织健康的最低值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Sciences Mathematics-Applied Mathematics

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

11 weeks

期刊介绍： APPS is an international journal. APPS covers a wide spectrum of pure and applied mathematics in science and technology, promoting especially papers presented at Carpato-Balkan meetings. The Editorial Board of APPS takes a very active role in selecting and refereeing papers, ensuring the best quality of contemporary mathematics and its applications. APPS is abstracted in Zentralblatt für Mathematik. The APPS journal uses Double blind peer review.