A Comparison of Local and Global Strategies for Exploiting Field Inversion on Separated Flows at Low Reynolds Number

Q1 Mathematics
Luca Muscarà, Marco Cisternino, Andrea Ferrero, Andrea Iob, Francesco Larocca
{"title":"A Comparison of Local and Global Strategies for Exploiting Field Inversion on Separated Flows at Low Reynolds Number","authors":"Luca Muscarà, Marco Cisternino, Andrea Ferrero, Andrea Iob, Francesco Larocca","doi":"10.3390/app14188382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prediction of separated flows at low Reynolds numbers is crucial for several applications in aerospace and energy fields. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are widely used but their accuracy is limited in the presence of transition or separation. In this work, two different strategies for improving RANS simulations by means of field inversion are discussed. Both strategies require solving an optimization problem to identify a correction field by minimizing the error on some measurable data. The obtained correction field is exploited with two alternative strategies. The first strategy aims to the identification of a relation that allows to express the local correction field as a function of some local flow features. However, this regression can be difficult or even impossible because the relation between the assumed input variables and the local correction could not be a function. For this reason, an alternative is proposed: a U-Net model is trained on the original and corrected RANS results. In this way, it is possible to perform a prediction with the original RANS model and then correct it by means of the U-Net. The methodologies are evaluated and compared on the flow around the NACA0021 and the SD7003 airfoils.","PeriodicalId":8224,"journal":{"name":"Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prediction of separated flows at low Reynolds numbers is crucial for several applications in aerospace and energy fields. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are widely used but their accuracy is limited in the presence of transition or separation. In this work, two different strategies for improving RANS simulations by means of field inversion are discussed. Both strategies require solving an optimization problem to identify a correction field by minimizing the error on some measurable data. The obtained correction field is exploited with two alternative strategies. The first strategy aims to the identification of a relation that allows to express the local correction field as a function of some local flow features. However, this regression can be difficult or even impossible because the relation between the assumed input variables and the local correction could not be a function. For this reason, an alternative is proposed: a U-Net model is trained on the original and corrected RANS results. In this way, it is possible to perform a prediction with the original RANS model and then correct it by means of the U-Net. The methodologies are evaluated and compared on the flow around the NACA0021 and the SD7003 airfoils.
在低雷诺数分离流体上利用场反演的局部和全局策略比较
预测低雷诺数下的分离流对于航空航天和能源领域的一些应用至关重要。雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)方程被广泛使用,但在存在过渡或分离的情况下,其精确度受到限制。在这项工作中,讨论了通过场反演改进 RANS 模拟的两种不同策略。这两种策略都需要解决一个优化问题,通过最小化某些可测量数据的误差来确定一个修正场。获得的修正场可通过两种备选策略加以利用。第一种策略旨在确定一种关系,将局部校正场表示为某些局部流动特征的函数。然而,这种回归可能很困难,甚至不可能实现,因为假定输入变量和局部校正之间的关系不可能是一个函数。为此,我们提出了一个替代方案:在原始和修正的 RANS 结果上训练 U-Net 模型。这样,就可以使用原始 RANS 模型进行预测,然后通过 U-Net 对其进行修正。我们对 NACA0021 和 SD7003 机翼周围的气流进行了评估和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Sciences
Applied Sciences Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: APPS is an international journal. APPS covers a wide spectrum of pure and applied mathematics in science and technology, promoting especially papers presented at Carpato-Balkan meetings. The Editorial Board of APPS takes a very active role in selecting and refereeing papers, ensuring the best quality of contemporary mathematics and its applications. APPS is abstracted in Zentralblatt für Mathematik. The APPS journal uses Double blind peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信