A Scoping Review of the Utilization of Opioid Use Treatment, Harm Reduction, and Culturally Tailored Interventions Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities in the United States

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jerel M. Ezell, Elinor Simek, Netra Shetty, Mai T. Pho, Ricky N. Bluthenthal, Dawn A. Goddard-Eckrich, Sugy Choi
{"title":"A Scoping Review of the Utilization of Opioid Use Treatment, Harm Reduction, and Culturally Tailored Interventions Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities in the United States","authors":"Jerel M. Ezell, Elinor Simek, Netra Shetty, Mai T. Pho, Ricky N. Bluthenthal, Dawn A. Goddard-Eckrich, Sugy Choi","doi":"10.1007/s11469-024-01373-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As part of a multilayered scoping review, we assessed literature on prevention and management interventions for racial/ethnic minorities in the United States (US) who non-medically use prescription opioids and/or who use illicit opioids such as heroin. The review specifically focused on access to and uptake of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and harm reduction resources. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature and governmental reports published between January 2000 and August 2024 on patterns of access to, and acceptability and utilization of, overdose prevention and opioid use management resources among racial/ethnic minorities in the US. Searches were conducted on Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, with us examining studies on the uptake of MOUD, such as buprenorphine and methadone, syringe services programs (SSPs), safe consumption sites, and harm reduction resources like naloxone (used to reverse overdoses) and fentanyl test strips (used to test for the presence of fentanyl in drug supplies). Additionally, we sought to identify and describe existing interventions for opioid use prevention and management that have expressly incorporated cultural adaptations related to racial/ethnic minorities’ specific needs and preferences in an effort to improve participants' sense of salience and acceptability and thus enhance utilization. We further endeavored to leverage this scoping review towards the development of research and intervention guidelines contoured to improve future scholarship and programming with these populations. The existing evidence suggests that racial/ethnic minorities in the US, specifically Black individuals, have diminished access to and/or utilization of preventive and management resources and amenities such as buprenorphine and naloxone, owing to structural deficits, provider bias, socioeconomic obstacles, geographic barriers, and communal stigma and distrust. Black individuals, relative to White individuals, also appear less likely to report using SSPs to obtain syringes and related resources, but across racial groups, those who used SSPs were more likely to be trained in, possess, and/or use naloxone. Further, there have been very few culturally tailored interventions for harm reduction or MOUD; there were limited data across the reviewed works on Native American/Indigenous or Asian populations; and the broader body of literature lacks methodological rigor. We close by proposing a cultural humility-focused model for better meeting the complex needs of these populations through research and primary and secondary intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01373-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of a multilayered scoping review, we assessed literature on prevention and management interventions for racial/ethnic minorities in the United States (US) who non-medically use prescription opioids and/or who use illicit opioids such as heroin. The review specifically focused on access to and uptake of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and harm reduction resources. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature and governmental reports published between January 2000 and August 2024 on patterns of access to, and acceptability and utilization of, overdose prevention and opioid use management resources among racial/ethnic minorities in the US. Searches were conducted on Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, with us examining studies on the uptake of MOUD, such as buprenorphine and methadone, syringe services programs (SSPs), safe consumption sites, and harm reduction resources like naloxone (used to reverse overdoses) and fentanyl test strips (used to test for the presence of fentanyl in drug supplies). Additionally, we sought to identify and describe existing interventions for opioid use prevention and management that have expressly incorporated cultural adaptations related to racial/ethnic minorities’ specific needs and preferences in an effort to improve participants' sense of salience and acceptability and thus enhance utilization. We further endeavored to leverage this scoping review towards the development of research and intervention guidelines contoured to improve future scholarship and programming with these populations. The existing evidence suggests that racial/ethnic minorities in the US, specifically Black individuals, have diminished access to and/or utilization of preventive and management resources and amenities such as buprenorphine and naloxone, owing to structural deficits, provider bias, socioeconomic obstacles, geographic barriers, and communal stigma and distrust. Black individuals, relative to White individuals, also appear less likely to report using SSPs to obtain syringes and related resources, but across racial groups, those who used SSPs were more likely to be trained in, possess, and/or use naloxone. Further, there have been very few culturally tailored interventions for harm reduction or MOUD; there were limited data across the reviewed works on Native American/Indigenous or Asian populations; and the broader body of literature lacks methodological rigor. We close by proposing a cultural humility-focused model for better meeting the complex needs of these populations through research and primary and secondary intervention.

Abstract Image

对美国少数种族/族裔使用阿片类药物治疗、减低伤害和文化定制干预措施情况的范围审查
作为多层次范围审查的一部分,我们评估了针对美国非医疗使用处方类阿片和/或使用海洛因等非法类阿片的少数种族/民族的预防和管理干预措施的文献。综述特别关注阿片类药物使用障碍 (MOUD) 和减少伤害资源的获取和吸收情况。我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2024 年 8 月间发表的同行评议文献和政府报告进行了一次范围界定审查,内容涉及美国少数种族/族裔对预防用药过量和阿片类药物使用管理资源的获取、接受和利用模式。我们在 Cochrane、PubMed、Embase 和 Google Scholar 等网站上进行了检索,研究了有关丁丙诺啡和美沙酮等 MOUD、注射器服务计划 (SSP)、安全消费场所以及纳洛酮(用于逆转过量用药)和芬太尼试纸(用于检测药物供应中是否存在芬太尼)等减低伤害资源的使用情况。此外,我们还试图确定并描述现有的阿片类药物使用预防和管理干预措施,这些措施明确纳入了与少数种族/族裔的特殊需求和偏好相关的文化调整,以努力提高参与者的显著性和可接受性,从而提高利用率。我们还努力利用此次范围界定审查来制定研究和干预指南,以改进未来针对这些人群的学术研究和计划。现有证据表明,由于结构性缺陷、提供者偏见、社会经济障碍、地理障碍以及社区耻辱和不信任,美国少数种族/民族,特别是黑人,获得和/或利用丁丙诺啡和纳洛酮等预防和管理资源及设施的机会较少。与白人相比,黑人报告使用 SSP 获取注射器和相关资源的可能性似乎也较小,但在所有种族群体中,使用 SSP 的人更有可能接受纳洛酮培训、拥有和/或使用纳洛酮。此外,很少有针对不同文化背景的减低伤害或 MOUD 干预措施;在所审查的作品中,关于美洲原住民/土著或亚洲人群的数据有限;更广泛的文献缺乏严谨的方法论。最后,我们提出了一个以文化谦逊为重点的模式,通过研究以及初级和次级干预,更好地满足这些人群的复杂需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
245
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health and Addictions (IJMH) is a publication that specializes in presenting the latest research, policies, causes, literature reviews, prevention, and treatment of mental health and addiction-related topics. It focuses on mental health, substance addictions, behavioral addictions, as well as concurrent mental health and addictive disorders. By publishing peer-reviewed articles of high quality, the journal aims to spark an international discussion on issues related to mental health and addiction and to offer valuable insights into how these conditions impact individuals, families, and societies. The journal covers a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, criminology, public health, psychiatry, history, and law. It publishes various types of articles, including feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes, letters to the editor, and commentaries. The journal is published six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信