Planning Split-Apheresis Designs for Demonstrating Comparability of Cellular and Gene Therapy Products

Richard Burdick, Jeff Hofer, Andrew Karl, Heath Rushing
{"title":"Planning Split-Apheresis Designs for Demonstrating Comparability of Cellular and Gene Therapy Products","authors":"Richard Burdick, Jeff Hofer, Andrew Karl, Heath Rushing","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00977-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A recent FDA draft guidance discusses statistical considerations for demonstrating comparability of cell and gene therapy products and processes. One experimental study described in the guidance is the split-apheresis design. The FDA draft guidance recommends a paired data analysis for such a design. This paper demonstrates that the paired analysis is under powered for some quality attributes for practical sample sizes of three to five donors unless a significant portion of variability is attributed to donor. Addition of historic lots from the pre-change process can increase the power for these attributes. This paper provides appropriate statistical methods for including this information.</p>","PeriodicalId":501692,"journal":{"name":"The AAPS Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00977-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent FDA draft guidance discusses statistical considerations for demonstrating comparability of cell and gene therapy products and processes. One experimental study described in the guidance is the split-apheresis design. The FDA draft guidance recommends a paired data analysis for such a design. This paper demonstrates that the paired analysis is under powered for some quality attributes for practical sample sizes of three to five donors unless a significant portion of variability is attributed to donor. Addition of historic lots from the pre-change process can increase the power for these attributes. This paper provides appropriate statistical methods for including this information.

Abstract Image

为证明细胞和基因治疗产品的可比性而规划分隔设计
美国食品及药物管理局最近的一份指南草案讨论了证明细胞和基因治疗产品及过程可比性的统计注意事项。指导意见中描述的一项实验研究是分次抽血设计。FDA 指南草案建议对这种设计进行配对数据分析。本文表明,对于三至五名供体的实际样本量而言,配对分析对某些质量属性的支持不足,除非很大一部分变异性归因于供体。如果加入更换前过程中的历史批次,则可提高这些属性的分析能力。本文提供了适当的统计方法来纳入这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信