Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence Following Extensive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tsia-Shu Lo, Aisha Alzabedi, Lan-Sin Jhang, Wu-Chiao Hsieh, Maherah Kamarudin, Louiza Erika Rellora
{"title":"Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence Following Extensive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery","authors":"Tsia-Shu Lo, Aisha Alzabedi, Lan-Sin Jhang, Wu-Chiao Hsieh, Maherah Kamarudin, Louiza Erika Rellora","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05918-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction and Hypothesis</h3><p>To assess the outcomes of mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures for urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) and identify risk factors for persistent USI (P-USI).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study analyzed 84 women who underwent a staged approach to MUS for USI after PRS for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification III and IV). The primary outcome was objective cure rate, defined by negative urine leakage on urodynamic study and a 1-h pad test weight of &lt; 2 g. Subjective cure rate was through a negative response to question 3 of UDI-6.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The overall objective cure rate was 81.0%. The highest cure rate was observed in de novo USI (MUS-D; 89.7%) compared with women with persistent USD (MUS-P). Patients with overt SUI exhibited lower cure rates than those with occult SUI. Predictive factors for persistent USI were lower pre-operative maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP; <i>p</i> = 0.031) and higher BMI in the MUS-P group than in the MUS-D group (<i>p</i> = 0.008). Subjective improvement was noted, especially in the MUS-D group, with a subjective cure rate of 78.6%. Those with MUS-D reported a higher impact on patient well-being post-surgery. No complications were observed after MUS surgery at follow-up.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Overt USI, low MUCP and high BMI are independent predictors of persistent USI after a staged MUS approach after pelvic reconstructive surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05918-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

To assess the outcomes of mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures for urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) and identify risk factors for persistent USI (P-USI).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 84 women who underwent a staged approach to MUS for USI after PRS for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification III and IV). The primary outcome was objective cure rate, defined by negative urine leakage on urodynamic study and a 1-h pad test weight of < 2 g. Subjective cure rate was through a negative response to question 3 of UDI-6.

Results

The overall objective cure rate was 81.0%. The highest cure rate was observed in de novo USI (MUS-D; 89.7%) compared with women with persistent USD (MUS-P). Patients with overt SUI exhibited lower cure rates than those with occult SUI. Predictive factors for persistent USI were lower pre-operative maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP; p = 0.031) and higher BMI in the MUS-P group than in the MUS-D group (p = 0.008). Subjective improvement was noted, especially in the MUS-D group, with a subjective cure rate of 78.6%. Those with MUS-D reported a higher impact on patient well-being post-surgery. No complications were observed after MUS surgery at follow-up.

Conclusions

Overt USI, low MUCP and high BMI are independent predictors of persistent USI after a staged MUS approach after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Abstract Image

尿道中段吊带治疗大范围骨盆重建手术后尿动力压力性尿失禁的效果
方法这项回顾性研究分析了84名因晚期盆腔器官脱垂(盆腔器官脱垂定量III和IV)而接受盆腔重建手术(PRS)后分阶段接受尿道中段吊带(MUS)术治疗尿动力压力性尿失禁(USI)的女性。主要结果是客观治愈率,即尿动力学检查漏尿阴性和 1 小时尿垫测试重量为 < 2 g。结果总体客观治愈率为 81.0%。与持续性USD(MUS-P)相比,新发USI(MUS-D;89.7%)的治愈率最高。显性 SUI 患者的治愈率低于隐性 SUI 患者。术前最大尿道闭合压(MUCP;P = 0.031)较低和体重指数(BMI)较高(MUS-P 组比 MUS-D 组高(P = 0.008))是持续性 SUI 的预测因素。主观症状有所改善,尤其是在 MUS-D 组,主观治愈率为 78.6%。MUS-D组患者在术后表示对患者福祉的影响更大。结论反向 USI、低 MUCP 和高 BMI 是盆腔重建手术后分期 MUS 方法后持续 USI 的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信